Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Year of publication
- 2008 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Taufliege (3) (remove)
Institute
Vertebrate and invertebrate visual systems exhibit similarities in early stages of visual processing. For instance, in the human brain, the modalities of color, form and motion are separately processed in parallel neuronal pathways. This basic property is also found in the fly Drosophila melanogaster which has a similar division in color- sensitive and (color blind) motion-sensitive pathways that are determined by two distinct subsets of photoreceptors (the R1-6 and the R7/8 system, respectively). Flies have a highly organized visual system that is characterized by its repetitive, retinotopic organization of four neuropils: the lamina, the medulla, the lobula and the lobula plate. Each of these consists of columns which contain the same set of neurons. In the lamina, axon bundles of six photoreceptors R1-6 that are directed towards the same point in space form columnar structures called cartridges. These are the visual sampling units and are associated with four types of first-order interneuron that receive common input from R1-6: L1, L2, L3 and the amacrine cells (amc, together with their postsynaptic partner T1). They constitute parallel pathways that have been studied in detail at the anatomical level. Little is known, however, about their functional role in processing behaviorally relevant information, e.g. for gaze stabilization, visual course control or the fixation of objects. The availability of a variety of neurogenetic tools for structure-function analysis in Drosophila allowed first steps into the genetic dissection of the neuronal circuitry mediating motion and position detection. In this respect, the choice of the effector turned out to be crucial. Surprisingly, it was found that the clostridial tetanus neurotoxin failed to block mature Drosophila photoreceptor synapses, but caused irreversible damage when expressed during their development. Therefore, the dominant-negative shibire allele shits1 which turned out to be better suited was used for blocking lamina interneurons and thereby analyzing the necessity of the respective pathways. To determine whether the latter were also sufficient for the same behavioral task, the inverse strategy was developed, based on the fact that lamina interneurons express histamine receptors encoded by the ort gene. The specific rescue of ort function in defined channels in an otherwise mutant background allowed studying their sufficiency in a given task. Combining these neurogenetic methods with the optomotor response and object induced orientation behavior as behavioral measures, the aim of the present thesis was to answer the following questions: (a) Which pathways feed into elementary motion detectors and which ones are necessary and/or sufficient for the detection of directional motion? (b) Do pathways exist which specifically mediate responses to unidirectional motion? (c) Which pathways are necessary and/or sufficient for object induced orientation behavior? Some basic properties of the visual circuitry were revealed: The two central cartridge pathways, represented by the large monopolar cells L1 and L2, are key players in motion detection. Under a broad range of stimulatory conditions, the two subsystems are redundant and are able to process motion independently of each other. To detect an impairment when only one of the pathways is intact, one has to drive the system to its operational limits. At low signal to noise ratios, i.e. at low pattern contrast or low background illumination, the L2 pathway has a higher sensitivity. At intermediate pattern contrast, both pathways are specialized in mediating responses to unidirectional motion of opposite stimulus direction. In contrast, neither the L3, nor the amc/T1 pathway is necessary or sufficient for motion detection. While the former may provide position information for orientation, the latter has a modulatory role at intermediate pattern contrast. Orientation behavior turned out to be even more robust than motion vision and may utilize a less sophisticated mechanism, as it does not require a nonlinear comparison of signals from neighboring visual sampling units. The position of objects is processed in several redundant pathways, involving both receptor subsystems. The fixation of objects does not generally require motion vision. However, motion detection improves the fixation of landmarks, especially when these are narrow or have a reduced contrast.
Eine der größten Herausforderungen in der Neurobiologie ist es, die neuronalen Prozesse zu verstehen, die Lernen und Gedächtnis zugrundeliegen. Welche biochemischen Pfade liegen z.B. der Koinzidenzdetektion von Reizen (klassische Konditionierung) oder einer Handlung und ihren Konsequenzen (operante Konditionierung) zugrunde? In welchen neuronalen Unterstrukturen werden diese Informationen gespeichert? Wie ähnlich sind die Stoffwechselwege, die diese beiden Arten des assoziativen Lernens vermitteln und auf welchem Niveau divergieren sie? Drosophila melanogaster ist wegen der Verfügbarkeit von Lern-Paradigmen und neurogenetischen Werkzeugen ein geeigneter Modell-Organismus, zum diese Fragen zu adressieren. Er ermöglicht eine umfangreiche Studie der Funktion des Gens S6KII, das in der Taufliege in klassischer und operanter Konditionierung unterschiedlich involviert ist (Bertolucci, 2002; Putz et al., 2004). Rettungsexperimenten zeigen, dass die olfaktorische Konditionierung in der Tully Maschine (ein klassisches, Pawlow’sches Konditionierungsparadigma) von dem Vorhandensein eines intakten S6KII Gens abhängt. Die Rettung war sowohl mit einer vollständigen, als auch einer partiellen Deletion erfolgreich und dies zeigt, dass der Verlust der phosphorylierenden Untereinheit der Kinase die Hauptursache des Funktionsdefektes war. Das GAL4/UAS System wurde benutzt, um die S6KII Expression zeitlich und räumlich zu steuern. Es wurde gezeigt, dass die Expression der Kinase während des adulten Stadiums für die Rettung hinreichend war. Dieser Befund schließt eine Entwicklungsstörung als Ursache für den mutanten Phänotyp aus. Außerdem zeigte die gezielte räumliche Rettung von S6KII die Notwendigkeit der Pilzkörper und schloss Strukturen wie das mediane Bündel, die Antennalloben und den Zentralkomplex aus. Dieses Muster ist dem vorher mit der rutabaga Mutation identifizierten sehr ähnlich (Zars et al., 2000). Experimente mit der Doppelmutante rut, ign58-1 deuten an, dass rutabaga und S6KII im gleichen Signalweg aktiv sind. Vorhergehende Studien hatten bereits gezeigt, dass die unterschiedlichen Ergebnisse bei operanter und klassischer Konditionierung auf verschiedenen Rollen für S6KII in den zwei Arten des Lernens hindeuten (Bertolucci, 2002; Putz, 2002). Diese Schlussfolgerung wurde durch den mutanten Phänotyp der transgenen Linien in der Positionskonditionierung und ihr wildtypisches Verhalten in der klassischen Konditionierung zusätzlich bekräftigt. Eine neue Art von Lern-Experiment, genannt „Idle Experiment“, wurde entworfen. Es basiert auf der Konditionierung der Laufaktivität, stellt eine operante Aufgabenstellung dar und überwindet einige der Limitationen des „Standard“ Heat-Box Experimentes. Die neue Art des Idle Experimentes erlaubt es, „gelernte Hilflosigkeit“ in Fliegen zu erforschen, dabei zeigte sich eine erstaunliche Ähnlichkeit zu den Vorgängen in komplizierteren Organismen wie Ratten, Mäusen oder Menschen. Gelernte Hilflosigkeit in der Taufliege wurde nur in den Weibchen beobachtet und wird von Antidepressiva beeinflusst.
Towards localizing the Synapsin-dependent olfactory memory trace in the brain of larval Drosophila
(2008)
Animals need to adapt and modify their behaviour according to a changing environment. In particular, the ability to learn about rewarding or punishing events is crucial for survival. One key process that underlies such learning are modifications of the synaptic connection between nerve cells. This Thesis is concerned with the genetic determinants of such plasticity, and with the site of these modifications along the sensory-to-motor loops in Drosophila olfactory learning. I contributed to the development and detailed parametric description of an olfactory associative learning paradigm in larval fruit flies (Chapter I.1.). The robustness of this learning assay, together with a set of transgenic Drosophila strains established during this Thesis, enabled me to study the role for Synapsin, a presynaptic phosphoprotein likely involved in synaptic plasticity, in this form of learning (Chapter I.2.), and to investigate the cellular site of the corresponding Synapsin-dependent memory trace (Chapter I.3.). These data provide the first comprehensive account to-date of the neurogenetic bases of learning in larval Drosophila. The role for Synapsin was also analyzed with regard to pain-relief learning in adult fruit flies (Chapter II.1.); that is, if an odour precedes an electric shock during training, flies subsequently avoid that odour (‘punishment learning’), whereas presentation of the odour upon the cessation of shock subsequently leads to approach towards the odour (‘relief larning’). Such pain-relief learning was also the central topic of a study concerning the white gene (Chapter II.2.), which as we report does affect pain-relief as well as punishment learning in adult flies, but leaves larval odour-food learning unaffected. These studies regarding pain-relief learning provide the very first hints, in any experimental system, concerning the genetic determinants of this form of learning.