Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Keywords
- Transkriptionsfaktor (3) (remove)
Institute
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (3) (remove)
Ubiquitination is a posttranslational modification with immense impact on a wide range of cellular processes, including proteasomal degradation, membrane dynamics, transcription, translation, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair and immunity. These diverse functions stem from the various ubiquitin chain types, topologies, and attachment sites on substrate proteins. Substrate recruitment and modification on lysine, serine or threonine residues is catalyzed by ubiquitin ligases (E3s). An important E3 that decides about the fate of numerous substrates is the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase HUWE1. Depending on the substrate, HUWE1 is involved in different processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, DNA repair, and transcription. One of the transcription factors that is ubiquitinated by HUWE1 is the MYC interacting zinc finger protein 1 (MIZ1). MIZ1 is a BTB/POZ (Bric-à-brac, Tramtrack and Broad-Complex/Pox virus and zinc finger) zinc finger (ZF) protein that binds to DNA through its 13 C2H2-type zinc fingers and either activates or represses the transcription of target genes, including genes involved in cell cycle arrest, such as P21CIP1 (CDKN1A). The precise functions of MIZ1 depend on its interactions with the MYC-MAX heterodimer, but also its heterodimerization with other BTB-ZF proteins, such as BCL6 or NAC1. How MIZ1 interacts with HUWE1 has not been studied and, as a consequence, it has not been possible to rationally develop tools to manipulate this interaction with specificity in order to better understand the effects of the interaction on the transcriptional function of MIZ1 on target genes or processes downstream. One aspect of my research, therefore, aimed at characterizing the MIZ1-HUWE1 interaction at a structural level. I determined a crystal structure of the MIZ1-BTB-domain in complex with a peptide, referred to as ASC, derived from a C terminal region of HUWE1, previously named ‘activation segment’. The binding mode observed in this crystal structure could be validated by binding and activity assays in vitro and by cell-based co-IP experiments in the context of N-terminally truncated HUWE1 constructs. I was not able to provide unambiguous evidence for the identified binding mode in the context of full-length HUWE1, indicating that MIZ1 recognition by HUWE1 requires yet unknown regions in the cell. While the structural details of the MIZ1-HUWE1 interaction remains to be elucidated in the context of the full-length proteins, the binding mode between MIZ1BTB and ASC revealed an interesting, atypical structural feature of the BTB domain of MIZ1 that, to my knowledge, has not been described for other BTB-ZF proteins: The B3 region in MIZ1BTB is conformationally malleable, which allows for a HUWE1-ASC-peptide-mediated β-sheet extension of the upper B1/B2-strands, resulting in a mixed, 3 stranded β-sheet. Such β-sheet extension does not appear to occur in other homo- or heterodimeric BTB-ZF proteins, including MIZ1-heterodimers, since these proteins typically possess a pre-formed B3-strand in at least one subunit. Instead, BCL6 co repressor-derived peptides (SMRT and BCOR) were found to extend the lower β-sheet in BCL6BTB by binding to an adjacent ‘lateral groove’. This interaction follows a 1:1 stoichiometry, whereas the MIZ1BTB-ASC-complex shows a 2:1 stoichiometry. The crystal structure of the MIZ1BTB-ASC-complex I determined, along with comparative binding studies of ASC with monomeric, homodimeric, and heterodimeric MIZ1BTB variants, respectively, suggests that ASC selects for MIZ1BTB homodimers. The structural data I generated may serve as an entry point for the prediction of additional interaction partners of MIZ1 that also have the ability to extend the upper β-sheet of MIZ1BTB. If successful, such interaction partners and structures thereof might aid the design of peptidomimetics or small-molecule inhibitors of MIZ1 signaling. Proof-of-principle for such a structure-guided approach targeting BTB domains has been provided by small-molecule inhibitors of BCL6BTB co-repressors interactions. If a similar approach led to molecules that interfere with specific interactions of MIZ1, they would provide intriguing probes to study MIZ1 biology and may eventually allow for the development of MIZ1-directed cancer therapeutics.
Several important cellular processes, including transcription, nucleotide excision repair and cell cycle control are mediated by the multifaceted interplay of subunits within the general transcription factor II H (TFIIH).
A better understanding of the molecular structure of TFIIH is the key to unravel the mechanism of action of this versatile protein complex within these pathways. This becomes especially important in the context of severe diseases like xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy, that arise from single point mutations in some of the TFIIH subunits.
In an attempt to structurally characterize the TFIIH complex, we harnessed the qualities of the eukaryotic thermophile Chaetomium thermophilum, a remarkable fungus, which has only recently been recognized as a novel model organism. Homologues of TFIIH from C. thermophilum were expressed in E. coli, purified to homogeneity and subsequently utilized for crystallization trials and biochemical studies.
The results of the present work include the first crystal structure of the p34 subunit of TFIIH, comprising the N-terminal domain of the protein. The structure revealed a von Willebrand Factor A (vWA) like fold, which is generally known to be involved in a multitude of protein-protein interactions. Structural comparison allowed to delineate similarities as well as differences to already known vWA domains, providing insight into the role of p34 within TFIIH. These results indicate that p34 assumes the role of a structural scaffold for other TFIIH subunits via its vWA domain, while likely serving additional functions, which are mediated through its
C-terminal zinc binding domain and are so far unknown.
Within TFIIH p34 interacts strongly with the p44 subunit, a positive regulator of the XPD helicase, which is required for regulation of RNA Polymerase II mediated transcription and essential for eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair. Based on the p34 vWA structure putative protein-protein interfaces were analyzed and binding sites for the p34 p44 interaction suggested. Continuous crystallization efforts then led to the first structure of a p34 p44 minimal complex, comprising the N-terminal vWA domain of p34 and the C-terminal C4C4 RING domain of p44. The structure of the p34 p44 minimal complex verified the previous hypothesis regarding the involved binding sites. In addition, careful analysis of the complex interface allowed to identify critical residues, which were subsequently mutated and analyzed with respect to their significance in mediating the p34 p44 interaction, by analytical size exclusion chromatography, electrophoretic mobility shift assays and isothermal titration calorimetry. The structure of the p34 p44 complex also revealed a binding mode of the p44 C4C4 RING domain, which differed from that of other known RING domains in several aspects, supporting the hypothesis that p44 contains a novel variation of this domain.
Ein sehr wichtiger Tumorsuppressor ist der Transkriptionsfaktor p53, der Zellschicksals-Entscheidungen wie Zellzyklus-Arrest und programmierten Zelltod (Apoptose) kontrolliert. Die Wirkung von p53 und von seinen Familienmitgliedern p63 und p73 beruht überwiegend auf der Fähigkeit, als Transkriptionsfaktoren die Genexpression zu regulieren. Die DNA-Bindung an Promotoren von Zielgenen ist dabei von grundlegender Bedeutung und wird durch die hoch konservierte zentrale DNA-Bindungs-Domäne und den Carboxy-Terminus bestimmt. In dieser Arbeit wurden die DNA-Bindungseigenschaften von p53 und verschiedener Carboxy-terminalen p73 Isoformen untersucht. In „electrophoretic mobility shift assay” (EMSA) Experimenten bildeten p53 und p73gamma nur schwache Sequenz-spezifische DNA-Komplexe, wohingegen p73alpha, beta und delta die DNA deutlich stärker banden. Die schwache DNA-Bindung von p53 und p73gamma kann durch mehrfach positiv geladene Carboxy-Termini erklärt werden, die über eine Sequenz-unabhängige DNA-Bindung ein Gleiten entlang der DNA ermöglichen. Die Deletion der Carboxy-terminalen Domäne (CTD) von p53 („p53delta30“) verstärkte dementsprechend die Sequenz-spezifische DNA-Bindung in vitro und seine Übertragung auf p73alpha („p73alpha+30“) schwächte sie ab. Mittels „fluorescence recovery after photobleaching“ (FRAP) Experimenten konnte in lebenden Zellen eine Verminderung der intra-nukleären Mobilität von p53 und p73alpha+30 durch die CTD gezeigt werden, die aus der Sequenz-unabhängigen DNA-Bindung resultiert. Zusätzlich reduzierte die CTD die Sequenz-spezifische DNA-Bindung von p53 an den p21 (CDKN1A) Promotor. Das Spektrum der regulierten Zielgene wurde in einer Genom-weiten Genexpressions-Analyse nicht durch die CTD verändert, sondern maßgeblich durch das Protein-Rückgrat von p53 beziehungsweise p73 bestimmt. Allerdings verminderte die CTD das Ausmaß der Transkriptions-Regulation und hemmte die Induktion von Zellzyklus-Arrest und Apoptose. Die mehrfach positiv geladene CTD in p53 besitzt demzufolge eine negativ regulatorische Wirkung, die in den wichtigsten p73 Isoformen alpha, beta und delta fehlt. Die zentrale DNA-Bindungs-Domäne trägt durch elektrostatische Wechselwirkungen zwischen H1-Helices (Aminosäurereste 177 bis 182) unterschiedlicher p53 Monomere zu kooperativer DNA-Bindung und zu Zellschicksals-Entscheidungen bei. Anhand von Mutanten, die unterschiedlich starke H1-Helix-Interaktionen ermöglichen, konnte gezeigt werden, dass starke Interaktionen die Bindung an Promotoren von pro-apoptotischen Genen verstärkte, wohingegen die Bindung an anti-apoptotische und Zellzyklus-blockierende Gene unabhängig von der Interaktions-Stärke war. Diese Unterschiede in der Promotor-Bindung ließen sich nicht auf eine veränderte zelluläre Lokalisation der Mutanten zurückführen, da alle Mutanten überwiegend nukleär lokalisiert waren. Eine an Serin 183 Phosphorylierungs-defekte Mutante von p53 bildete stabile DNA-Komplexe, entsprechend einer Mutante mit starker H1-Helix-Interaktion, und trans-aktivierte pro-apoptotische Promotoren stärker als Mutanten, die Phosphorylierung von p53 an Serin 183 simulieren. Da zusätzlich bekannt ist, dass Serin 183 mit der H1-Helix wechselwirkt, könnte diese Phosphorylierung einen physiologischen Mechanismus zur Regulation der H1-Helix-Interaktion und damit des Zellschicksals darstellen. Zusammenfassend ließ sich zeigen, dass sowohl die Interaktions-Stärke zweier DNA-Bindungs-Domänen als auch die elektrische Ladung des Carboxy-Terminus die DNA-Bindungseigenschaften von p53 Familienmitgliedern bestimmen und so Zellschicksals-Entscheidungen der p53 Familie beeinflussen.