Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2016 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (3)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- French (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Attentat (1)
- Bataclan (Paris) (1)
- De Miseria Condicionis Humanae (1)
- Deschamps, Eustache (1)
- Double lay de fragilité humaine (1)
- Ekel (1)
- Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen (1)
- Haager Konferenz für Internationales Privatrecht (1)
- Hollande, François (1)
- Innocent III (1)
- Japan (1)
- Japoneries d’automne (1)
- Körper (1)
- Leiche (1)
- Literatur (1)
- Loti, Pierre (1)
- Madame Chrysanthème (1)
- Meiji-Periode (1)
- Meinungsbildung (1)
- Mittelalter (1)
- OHADA (1)
- Pierre Loti (1)
- Wirtschaftsrecht (1)
- debate (1)
- influence (1)
- terrorist attack, Paris, 13th November 2015 (1)
Institute
La Conférence de La Haye de droit international privé (la Conférence de La Haye) est une organisation intergouvernementale mondiale qui a pour vocation d’œuvrer à un monde dans lequel les individus et les sociétés peuvent bénéficier d’une grande sécurité juridique dans les situations transfrontières. Pour ce faire, la Conférence de La Haye, en tant que creuset de traditions juridiques diverses, développe et assure le suivie d’instruments juridiques multilatéraux auxquels sont associés plus de 150 pays dans le monde. L’Organisation pour l’Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires (OHADA) est une organisation internationale panafricaine créée en 1993 et ayant pour but l’unification du droit des affaires en Afrique. Le présent article analyse les instruments qui seraient d’un grand intérêt pour l’OHADA et ses Etats membres. Il établit les rapports entre les règles de droit des affaires et de procédure en vigueur dans l’espace OHADA et la Convention du 5 octobre 1961 supprimant l'exigence de la légalisation des actes publics étrangers, la Convention du 30 juin 2005 sur les accords d'élection de for, et les Principes sur le choix de la loi applicable aux contrats commerciaux internationaux.
The study uses the category of disgust in order to analyse the representation of the human body and the corpse in one of the most influential medieval treatises, the De Miseria Condicionis Humanae (1195) written by Pope Innocent III, and its little known old French adaptation Double lay de fragilité humaine (1383) by Eustache Deschamps. Analysing how both use disgust as an aesthetic means, which appeals to emotions and turns off reason, helps to point out the pedagogical and moral function of the texts. The comparison between them shows that Deschamps stays faithful to his Latin model, but that he nevertheless has to make certain modifications in order to adapt the prose text into a lyrical form. Furthermore, this approach clearly elucidates what differences there are between the conceptions of the human body and death in the two texts, revealing at the same time divergent theological points of view.
The novel Madame Chrysanthème (1887) and the essays collected in Japoneries d’automne (1889) written by French travel author Pierre Loti offer a paradoxical view of Japan during the Meiji period. In both travel writings, the author is torn between aesthetic japonism – which spread all over Europe at the end of the 19th century – and exotic expectations, i.e. the picturesque fascination of the Other. The latter, however, remains unsatisfied throughout his stay. In both writings, Pierre Loti provides an insight into Japan that entirely reflects the spirit of his time. Thereby, he contributes to an image of Japan, which will long remain vivid in the Occident. Contemporaries perceive Loti’s representation of Japan as a realistic testimony, tinged with both sensory impressions and his highly ambiguous feelings towards the distant country, which in the end remained incomprehensible to him.
After the terrorist attacks on November 13th, the French public, the whole of Europe and many parts of the world were waiting for president François Hollande to address his fellow “citoyens”. Being the most important political figure – both by constitution and by influence on public discourse – the president’s words bear great importance for the subsequent debate and interpretation of the events. Therefore, the question arises: How did the president shape the debate in the hours and days after the attacks? To answer this question, we have identified typical structures in Hollande’s rhetorical reaction to the attacks, performing a topos as well as a keyword analysis of the speeches the president held within two weeks after November 13th. In a contrastive analysis we have compared Hollande’s speeches to the Europarl Corpus. Using the software programme sketch engine, we have filtered out the 100 most frequent keywords and classified them into semantic fields (data-driven approach). All in all, terrorism, action and nation/identity are the three predominant semantic fields, whereas references to victimhood barely appear. These findings are congruent with the results of our topos analysis that reveals a predominance of argumentative structures that form a strong main topos of resilience, emphasising the greatness of France and its people and culture, calling to action and avoiding any tendencies of resignation.