Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Keywords
- Blickbewegung (2) (remove)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (2) (remove)
Humans use their eyes not only as visual input devices to perceive the environment, but also as an action tool in order to generate intended effects in their environment. For instance, glances are used to direct someone else's attention to a place of interest, indicating that gaze control is an important part of social communication. Previous research on gaze control in a social context mainly focused on the gaze recipient by asking how humans respond to perceived gaze (gaze cueing). So far, this perspective has hardly considered the actor’s point of view by neglecting to investigate what mental processes are involved when actors decide to perform an eye movement to trigger a gaze response in another person. Furthermore, eye movements are also used to affect the non-social environment, for instance when unlocking the smartphone with the help of the eyes. This and other observations demonstrate the necessity to consider gaze control in contexts other than social communication whilst at the same time focusing on commonalities and differences inherent to the nature of a social (vs. non-social) action context. Thus, the present work explores the cognitive mechanisms that control such goal-oriented eye movements in both social and non-social contexts.
The experiments presented throughout this work are built on pre-established paradigms from both the oculomotor research domain and from basic cognitive psychology. These paradigms are based on the principle of ideomotor action control, which provides an explanatory framework for understanding how goal-oriented, intentional actions come into being. The ideomotor idea suggests that humans acquire associations between their actions and the resulting effects, which can be accessed in a bi-directional manner: Actions can trigger anticipations of their effects, but the anticipated resulting effects can also trigger the associated actions. According to ideomotor theory, action generation involves the mental anticipation of the intended effect (i.e., the action goal) to activate the associated motor pattern. The present experiments involve situations where participants control the gaze of a virtual face via their eye movements. The triggered gaze responses of the virtual face are consistent to the participant’s eye movements, representing visual action effects. Experimental situations are varied with respect to determinants of action-effect learning (e.g., contingency, contiguity, action mode during acquisition) in order to unravel the underlying dynamics of oculomotor control in these situations. In addition to faces, conditions involving changes in non-social objects were included to address the question of whether mechanisms underlying gaze control differ for social versus non-social context situations.
The results of the present work can be summarized into three major findings. 1. My data suggest that humans indeed acquire bi-directional associations between their eye movements and the subsequently perceived gaze response of another person, which in turn affect oculomotor action control via the anticipation of the intended effects. The observed results show for the first time that eye movements in a gaze-interaction scenario are represented in terms of their gaze response in others. This observation is in line with the ideomotor theory of action control. 2. The present series of experiments confirms and extends pioneering results of Huestegge and Kreutzfeldt (2012) with respect to the significant influence of action effects in gaze control. I have shown that the results of Huestegge and Kreutzfeldt (2012) can be replicated across different contexts with different stimulus material given that the perceived action effects were sufficiently salient. 3. Furthermore, I could show that mechanisms of gaze control in a social gaze-interaction context do not appear to be qualitatively different from those in a non-social context.
All in all, the results support recent theoretical claims emphasizing the role of anticipation-based action control in social interaction. Moreover, my results suggest that anticipation-based gaze control in a social context is based on the same general psychological mechanisms as ideomotor gaze control, and thus should be considered as an integral part rather than as a special form of ideomotor gaze control.
Der Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met Polymorphismus (rs4680) ist am Abbau von Dopamin und Noradrenalin im menschlichen Gehirn beteiligt. In bisherigen Studien konnte gezeigt werden, dass das Met-Allel mit einer erhöhten Reaktivität auf negative Stimuli assoziiert ist. Auf Basis der Tonischen/ Phasischen Dopaminhypothese wird postuliert, dass diese erhöhte Reaktivität auf negative Reize durch defizitäre Disengagementprozesse verursacht sein könnte. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war es daher, diese theoretische Annahme mithilfe von Blickbewegungsmessungen zu überprüfen und zu untersuchen, ob die erhöhte Reaktivität sich auch in verlängerten Disengagementlatenzen von negativen Reizen widerspiegelt. Es wurden dafür drei Studien durchgeführt, in denen eine adaptierte Version der emotionalen Antisakkadenaufgabe in Verbindung mit einer Blickbewegungsmessung eingesetzt wurde. In der zweiten Studie wurde zusätzlich eine EEG-Messung durchgeführt. Außerdem wurde in der dritten Studie die Aufmerksamkeitslokation manipuliert. In der ersten und zweiten Studie zeigte sich nicht wie erwartet ein linearer Effekt in Relation zum COMT Val158Met Polymorphismus, sondern ein Heterosiseffekt. Dieser Effekt zeigte sich nur in der einfacheren Prosakkadenbedingung. In der ersten Studie wurde der Heterosiseffekt bei negativen Reizen gefunden, wohingegen in der zweiten Studie der Heterosiseffekt nur in einer EEG- Komponente, der Early Posterior Negativity (EPN), aber sowohl bei positiven als auch negativen Reizen gefunden wurde. In der dritten Studie zeigte sich kein Genotypeffekt. Es wird vermutet, dass der COMT Effekt in der emotionalen Verarbeitung aufgabenspezifisch sein könnte und daher, neben linearen Zusammenhängen, unter bestimmten Umständen auch ein Heterosiseffekt auftreten kann. Die Ergebnisse sollten nicht auf eine männliche Stichprobe generalisiert werden, da in allen Studien lediglich weibliche Versuchspersonen teilnahmen.