Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Year of publication
- 2020 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (4)
Keywords
- bone (4) (remove)
Institute
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- EU-1650-0006 (1)
Patients affected by gastroenteropancreatic–neuroendocrine tumors (GEP–NETs) have an increased risk of developing osteopenia and osteoporosis, as several factors impact on bone metabolism in these patients. In fact, besides the direct effect of bone metastasis, bone health can be affected by hormone hypersecretion (including serotonin, cortisol, and parathyroid hormone-related protein), specific microRNAs, nutritional status (which in turn could be affected by medical and surgical treatments), and vitamin D deficiency. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), a hereditary syndrome associated with NET occurrence, bone damage may carry other consequences. Osteoporosis may negatively impact on the quality of life of these patients and can increment the cost of medical care since these patients usually live with their disease for a long time. However, recommendations suggesting screening to assess bone health in GEP–NET patients are missing. The aim of this review is to critically analyze evidence on the mechanisms that could have a potential impact on bone health in patients affected by GEP–NET, focusing on vitamin D and its role in GEP–NET, as well as on factors associated with MEN1 that could have an impact on bone homeostasis.
Muscle and bone interact via physical forces and secreted osteokines and myokines. Physical forces are generated through gravity, locomotion, exercise, and external devices. Cells sense mechanical strain via adhesion molecules and translate it into biochemical responses, modulating the basic mechanisms of cellular biology such as lineage commitment, tissue formation, and maturation. This may result in the initiation of bone formation, muscle hypertrophy, and the enhanced production of extracellular matrix constituents, adhesion molecules, and cytoskeletal elements. Bone and muscle mass, resistance to strain, and the stiffness of matrix, cells, and tissues are enhanced, influencing fracture resistance and muscle power. This propagates a dynamic and continuous reciprocity of physicochemical interaction. Secreted growth and differentiation factors are important effectors of mutual interaction. The acute effects of exercise induce the secretion of exosomes with cargo molecules that are capable of mediating the endocrine effects between muscle, bone, and the organism. Long-term changes induce adaptations of the respective tissue secretome that maintain adequate homeostatic conditions. Lessons from unloading, microgravity, and disuse teach us that gratuitous tissue is removed or reorganized while immobility and inflammation trigger muscle and bone marrow fatty infiltration and propagate degenerative diseases such as sarcopenia and osteoporosis. Ongoing research will certainly find new therapeutic targets for prevention and treatment.
Background
The role of cement-augmented screw fixation for calcaneal fracture treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study was performed to biomechanically analyze screw osteosynthesis by reinforcement with either a calcium phosphate (CP)-based or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based injectable bone cement.
Methods
A calcaneal fracture (Sanders type IIA) including a central cancellous bone defect was generated in 27 synthetic bones, and the specimens were assigned to 3 groups. The first group was fixed with four screws (3.5 mm and 6.5 mm), the second group with screws and CP-based cement (Graftys (R) QuickSet; Graftys, Aix-en-Provence, France), and the third group with screws and PMMA-based cement (Traumacem (TM) V+; DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA). Biomechanical testing was conducted to analyze peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, and stiffness in following a standardized protocol.
Results
The peak-to-peak displacement under a 200-N load was not significantly different among the groups; however, peak-to-peak displacement under a 600- and 1000-N load as well as total displacement exhibited better stability in PMMA-augmented screw osteosynthesis compared to screw fixation without augmentation. The stiffness of the construct was increased by both CP- and PMMA-based cements.
Conclusion
Addition of an injectable bone cement to screw osteosynthesis is able to increase fixation strength in a biomechanical calcaneal fracture model with synthetic bones. In such cases, PMMA-based cements are more effective than CP-based cements because of their inherently higher compressive strength. However, whether this high strength is required in the clinical setting for early weight-bearing remains controversial, and the non-degradable properties of PMMA might cause difficulties during subsequent interventions in younger patients.
Autologous bone still represents today’s gold standard for the treatment of critical size bone defects and fracture non-unions despite associated disadvantages regarding limitations in availability, donor site morbidity, costs and efficacy. Bone tissue engineered constructs would present a promising alternative to currently available treatments. However, research on preclinical animal studies still fails to provide clinical applicable results able to allow the replacement of currently applied methods. It seems that the idea of bone tissue engineering, which has now been integral part of academic studies for over 30 years, got somehow stuck at an intermediate level, in between intense preclinical research and striven stages of initial clinical trial phases. A clear discrepancy exists between the number of studies with preclinical animal models for bone tissue engineering and the number of clinically approved bone tissue engineered constructs available to patients.
The aim of this thesis was hence to evaluate preclinical animal models for bone tissue engineering as well as the perception of scientists and clinicians towards these models. Moreover, the general role of bone tissue engineering and its clinical need assessed by scientists and surgeons was investigated. A survey was conducted questioning both scientific and clinical opinions on currently available study designs and researchers’ satisfaction with preclinical animal models. Additionally, a literature research was conducted, resulting in 167 papers from the last 10 years that report current designs of preclinical orthotopic animal studies in bone tissue engineering. Thereby, the focus lied on the description of the models regarding animal species, strain, age, gender and defect design. The outcome of the literature search was evaluated and compared to the outcome obtained from the survey.
The survey data revealed that both scientists and surgeons generally remain positive about the future role of bone tissue engineering and its step to clinical translation, at least in the distant future, where it then might replace the current gold standard, autologous bone. Moreover, most of the participants considered preclinical animal models as relevant and well developed but the results as not yet realizable in the clinics. Surgeons thereby demonstrated a slightly more optimistic perception of currently conducted research with animal models compared to scientists. However, a rather inconsistent description of present preclinical study designs could be discerned when evaluating the reported study designs in the survey and the papers of the literature search.
Indeed, defining an appropriate animal species, strain, age, gender, observation time, observation method and surgical design often depends on different indications and research questions and represents a highly challenging task for the establishment of a preclinical animal model. The existing lack of valid guidelines for preclinical testing of bone tissue engineering leads hence to a lack of well standardized preclinical animal models. Moreover, still existing knowledge gaps regarding aspects that affect the process of fracture healing, such as vascularization or immunological aspects, were found to hinder clinical translation of bone tissue engineered constructs.
Using literature review and survey, this thesis points out critical issues that need to be addressed to allow clinical translation of bone tissue engineered constructs. It can be concluded that currently existing study designs with preclinical animal models cannot live up to the claim of providing suitable results for clinical implementation. The here presented comprehensive summary of currently used preclinical animal models for bone tissue engineering reveals a missing consensus on the usage of models such as an apparent lack of reporting and standardization regarding the study designs described in both papers from the literature review and the survey. It thereby indicates a crucial need to improve preclinical animal models in order to allow clinical translation. Despite the fact that participants of the survey generally revealed a positive perception towards the use of bone tissue engineered constructs and affirmed the clinical need for such novel designs, the missing standardization constitutes a main weak point for the provision of reliable study outcome and the translational success of the models. The optimization of reproducibility and reliability, as well as the further understanding of ongoing mechanisms in bone healing in order to develop effective tissue engineered constructs, need to form the basis of all study designs. The study outcomes might then fulfill the requirements of maybe today's and hopefully tomorrow's aging population.