Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Keywords
- Bronchialasthma (2) (remove)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (2) (remove)
In the last decades, both the incidence and the severity of asthma have steadily increased. Furthermore, available therapies only treat the symptoms but do not cure the disease. Immune modulation induced by TLR agonists may be a promising novel approach to effectively treat asthma as it targets the underlying immunopathology directly rather than one mediator alone. The aim of this thesis was to investigate if the immunostimulatory properties of Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists can be utilized to develop novel therapeutic intervention strategies for the treatment of asthma using murine models of allergic inflammation. For this purpose five different TLR agonists were tested in preclinical mouse models of acute and chronic asthma, both in preventive and therapeutic settings. Firstly, TLR-2, 3, 4, 7/8 and 9 agonists were delivered intratracheally at different doses before pulmonary allergen exposure in the asthma model of acute inflammation. TLR9 agonist CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG) > TLR7 agonist Resiquimod (R848) > TLR3 agonists poly(I:C) strongly reduced allergen induced airway eosinophilia and IL-4 levels in a dose-dependent manner. All TLR agonists increased neutrophil numbers, TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS) > TLR2 agonist lipoteichonic acid (LTA) > poly(I:C) > CpG > R848 and, with the exception of R848, the amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the airways. Suppressive effects were not dependent upon IFN-γ and IL-10 or associated with increased numbers of regulatory T cells in the airways. All TLR agonists, except LTA, similarly reduced airway eosinophilia and IL-4 levels when applied therapeutically after allergen challenge. These results show that the TLR agonists have different suppressive effects on TH2 responses in the airways which further depend on the dose and the experimental setup in which they were tested. Interestingly, all agonists induced airway neutrophilia, albeit to different degrees, raising the question if TLR ligands are safe for human use when applied directly into the lung. Different TLR agonists are also being developed for human use as adjuvants combined with allergen in specific immunotherapy. Recent clinical data suggest that this may be achieved by induction of allergen-specific TH1 responses. For this reason, the ability of different TLR agonists to induce allergen-specific TH1 and suppress allergen-specific TH2 responses in a preclinical setting was investigated in this thesis. Different doses of the TLR agonists were applied together with allergen, then mice were exposed to allergen aerosol. CpG > LPS >LTA dose-dependently strongly suppressed the development of airway eosinophilia with poly(I:C) and R848 having no effect. The decrease in eosinophilic numbers was associated withincreased neutrophils present in the airways. IL-4 and IL-5 levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were also decreased when poly(I:C), LPS, and CpG were used. All TLR agonists increased allergen-specific IgG2a, and with the exception of poly(I:C), reduced allergen-specific IgE levels in the serum. Cutaneous anaphylaxis to allergen was completely prevented when LPS or CpG were given as adjuvant. The strongest TH1 responses were induced by CpG and poly(I:C), characterized by the presence of IFN-γ in the bronchoalveolar lavage and the highest allergen-specific IgG2a levels in the serum. This data supports approaches to use TLR9 or TLR4 agonists for human therapy as adjuvant in combination with allergen in novel specific immunotherapy formulations. In the last part of the thesis, it was investigated if TLR activation can also affect the pathology of severe chronic asthma. Therapeutic administration of R848 or CpG reduced features of inflammation and remodeling. Both agonists showed superior effects to dexamethasone, with CpG being more efficient than R848. This result again supports a TLR9-based therapy as a viable option for the treatment of severe chronic asthma which may present a potential alternative for anti-inflammatory therapy with steroids. Taken together, the results of this thesis support the use of TLR agonists to treat asthma. The most favorable efficacy/safety ratio is to be expected from TLR-based therapies combining TLR4 or TLR9 agonists with allergen in specific immunotherapy. In regard to TLR agonist monotherapy, R848 and CpG showed the most promising profiles, CpG particularly in a model of severe chronic asthma. However, since all TLR agonists used in this study also showed pro-inflammatory potential, the safety aspect of such an approach needs to be taken into account.
Allergic disease are inflammatory disorders in which aberrant immune regulation occurs, and susceptible individuals mount allergen specific T helper 2 (Th2) responses, which drives disease pathology. Recent studies indicate that Th2 responses that are characteristic of allergic manifestations can be regulated by both naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory (Treg) cells and antigen-driven IL-10-secreting CD4+ regulatory T cells. Evidence is also emerging that successful Allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) might work through the induction of IL-10-secreting regulatory T cells. In the first part of this work, I demonstrated the efficiency of allergen specific immunotherapy in the mouse model for allergic airway inflammation. Here I could show that intranasal administration of SIT abrogates allergic symptoms more efficiently, than the subcutaneous treatment. Furthermore, an IL-4/IL-13 (QY) inhibitor was used as an adjuvant for SIT, which has been demonstrated to have an anti-allergic potential, when administered prophylactically during allergic sensitization. However, the combination therapy with SIT and the inhibitory molecule QY did not show any significant enhancement in regards to all measured allergic parameters, when compared to monotherapy with SIT. These results provide the evidence, that shift from Th2 to Th1 cytokine profile might not be a key event in successful SIT. Subsequently, the investigation of immune mechanisms under successful SIT demonstrate that the increase of IL-10 secreting CD4+ T regulatory cells is associated with the suppression of airway inflammation in our mouse system, suggesting that these T cell subsets might be involved in the regulatory mechanisms of allergic disorders. In agreement with these findings is the second part of this work, where superagonistic a-CD28 mAb´s were used for the expansion of T regulatory cell subsets in our murine model for allergic airway inflammation. Here I could show, that the application of a-CD28 mAb during allergic sensitization, resulted in the establishment of a Th2 state, rather than a stimulation of a Treg cell population, supporting the Th2 promoting role of a-CD28 mAb together with TCR engagement. However, interesting findings were obtained by application of the superagonistic a-CD28 mAb in the challenge phase in established allergy. Conversely to the previous experiment, therapeutic administration of a-CD28 mAb lead to the generation of IL-10 secreting CD4+CD25+ T cell population in line with the induction of anti-allergic effects. Taking together the results of this study argue for the anti-inflammatory properties of T regulatory cells in allergic disease and highlights importance of these T cell subsets in the suppression of Th2 cell-driven response to allergen. Moreover, these observations suggest that the induction of IL-10 in vivo by T regulatory cells may represent a novel treatment strategy for allergic disorders.