Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Stammzelle (3) (remove)
Institute
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (3) (remove)
Imprinted genes play important roles in brain development. As the neural developmental capabilities of human parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells (hpESCs) with only a maternal genome were not assessed in great detail, hence here the potential of hpESCs to differentiate into various neural subtypes was determined. In addition DNA methylation and expression of imprinted genes upon neural differentiation was also investigated. The results demonstrated that hpESC-derived neural stem cells (hpNSCs) showed expression of NSC markers Sox1, Nestin, Pax6, and Musashi1 (MS1), the silencing of pluripotency genes (Oct4, Nanog) and the absence of activation of neural crest (Snai2, FoxD3) and mesodermal (Acta1) markers. Moreover, confocal images of hpNSC cultures exhibited ubiquitous expression of NSC markers Nestin, Sox1, Sox2 and Vimentin. Differentiating hpNSCs for 28 days generated neural subtypes with neural cell type-specific morphology and expression of neuronal and glial markers, including Tuj1, NeuN, Map2, GFAP, O4, Tau, Synapsin1 and GABA. hpNSCs also responded to region-specific differentiation signals and differentiated into regional phenotypes such as midbrain dopaminergic- and motoneuron-type cells. hpESC-derived neurons showed typical neuronal Na+/K+ currents in voltage clamp mode, elicited multiple action potentials with a maximum frequency of 30 Hz. Cell depicted a typical neuron-like current pattern that responded to selective pharmacological blockers of sodium (tetrodotoxin) and potassium (tetraethylammonium) channels. Furthermore, in hpESCs and hpNSCs the majority of CpGs of the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) KvDMR1 were methylated whereas DMR1 (H19/Igf2 locus) showed partial or complete absence of CpG methylation, which is consistent with a parthenogenetic (PG) origin. Upon differentiation parent-of-origin-specific gene expression was maintained in hpESCs and hpNSCs as demonstrated by imprinted gene expression analyses. Together this shows that despite the lack of a paternal genome, hpNSCs are proficient in differentiating into glial- and neuron-type cells, which exhibit electrical activity similar to newly formed neurons. Moreover, maternal-specific gene expression and imprinting-specific DNA-methylation are largely maintained upon neural differentiation. hpESCs are a means to generate histocompatible and disease allele-free ESCs. Additionally, hpESCs are a unique model to study the influence of imprinting on neurogenesis.
Uniparental zygotes with two genomes from the same sex can be established from fertilised oocytes after pronuclear exchange. They contain two maternal (gynogenetic; GG) or paternal (androgenetic; AG) pronuclei and are not competent to develop into viable offspring but they can form blastocysts from which embryonic stem cells (ES cells) can be derived. The developmental potential of uniparental ES cells is not fully investigated. The restricted developmental potential of uniparental cells is cell-intrinsic and probably reflects the different roles maternal and paternal genomes play during development. Following blastocyst injection, both GG and AG ES cells show biased and parent-of-origin-specific chimaera formation. While the in vitro and in vivo neural differentiation potential of GG ES cells is well characterised the neural developmental potential of AG ES cells is less clear. In an earlier study the group of K. John McLaughlin reported that AG and GG ES cell-derived hematopoietic stem cells conveyed long-term, multi-lineage hematopoietic engraftment with no associated pathologies (Eckardt et al., 2007). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of AG uniparental murine ES cells to differentiate in vitro and in vivo into neural progenitor / stem cells and further into neurons, astro- and oligodendroglia in comparison to GG and biparental (normal fertilised; N) ES cells. Uniparental and biparental ES cells were obtained from K. John McLaughlin’s group and a cell culture system was established to expand uniparental (AG, GG) and biparental N ES cells on murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF). A multistep-protocol was used to differentiate ES cells towards pan-neural progenitor cells and neuronal and glial cell types (Brüstle et al., 1997). The ability of terminal neural differentiation in vitro was analysed by fluorescence microscopy using neuronal and glial lineage markers. In parallel, eGFP+ AG or N ES cells were injected into blastocysts prior to their transfer into foster mothers. At E12.5 and E14.5, embryos were isolated, forebrains were dissected and by means of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) eGFP+ donor cells were isolated from chimeric brains. Both eGFP+ donor and corresponding eGFP- blastocyst-derived brain cells were expanded and analyses of differentiation potential and self-renewal capacity were performed. Also, cryosections of E12.5 chimeric brains were analysed for donor contribution to the neuronal lineage by immunofluorescence microscopy. Here it is described that following in vitro differentiation, AG pan-neural progenitor cells have similar abilities to differentiate into neuronal and glial lineages as GG and N pan-neural progenitor cells. In cryosections of E12.5 chimeric brains no differences in brain engraftment and formation of immature neuronal cells between uniparental AG and N donor cells were detected. AG and N ES cell-derived cells isolated from chimeric foetal brains by FACS exhibited similar neurosphere initiating cell frequencies and neural multi-lineage differentiation potential. Therefore, the data of this study suggest that the previously described differences in the in vivo engraftment pattern of uniparental inner cell mass (ICM) cells in foetal brains (Keverne et al., 1996) are not primarily due to limitations in the proliferation or differentiation properties of uniparental neural progenitor cells. The results presented here indicate that AG ES cell-derived neural progenitor / stem cells did not differ from N neural progenitor / stem cells in their self-renewal and their neural multi-lineage differentiation potential. Also AG ES cell-derived cells contributed to developing brains at early foetal developmental stages showing a widespread and balanced distribution in chimeric brains. AG brain cells form neurospheres with self-renewal and neural differentiation capacity similar to N ES cell-derived brain cells. Thus, the data of this study together indicate that the neural developmental potential in vivo and in vitro of AG and N ES cells does not differ.
Stem cells with the particular potential to self renew and to differentiate into multiple cell lineages are fascinating cell types for basic and applied research. Pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of preimplantation embryos. Upon differentiation ES cells can give rise to cells of ecto-, meso- and endoderm including germ cells. In contrast, multipotent adult stem cells are more restricted in their differentiation outcomes,they differentiate into cells of their tissue of origin. For example, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that reside in hemogenic tissues such as the bone marrow (BM) differentiate into hemato-/lymphoid cell lineages. Upon differentiation of stem cells not the genome, but the epigenetic regulation changes. Differentiation-associated epigenetic changes generate cell types with distinct phenotypes and functions. For stem cell-based therapies it is important to deeper understand the relation between epigenome and cellular function. In the scope of this thesis I aimed to analyze cultures of differentiating stem cells with respect to gene expression, chromatin regulation and differentiation potential. For the analysis of global histone modification levels, which represent one mechanism for epigenetic regulation, fow cytometric protocols were established that allow single cell measurements. By applying this methodology decreased histone acetylation levels were shown in differentiated ES cell populations. In contrast, comparable histone acetylation levels were observed in differentiated and undifferentiated BM cells. In addition, I investigated effects of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) on murine BM cells, comprising also HSCs. Upon TSA treatment the frequency of cells with in vitro and in vivo hematopoietic activity was increased, while lineage committed cells underwent apoptosis. Next, the loss of pluripotency was assessed in differentiating ES cell cultures. Using short-term in vitro differentiation protocols marker-based analyses and functional assays were performed.Functionally pluripotency was diminished after 2 days of differentiation as assessed by colony formation, embryoid body (EB) formation and cardiomyogenic differentiation approaches. In contrast, pluripotency marker expression was reduced at later time points. Further, the application of distinct differentiation systems (aggregation EB, clonal EB or monolayer (ML) culture) had an impact on the progression and homogeneity of differentiation cultures. To further study the end of pluripotency, differentiated ES cells were placed under ES cell culture conditions. The data suggest that 3 days differentiated ES cells had passed a point of no return and failed to regain Oct4-eGFP expression and that HDAC inhibitor treatment selectively killed differentiated ES cells. Finally, I aimed to study the effect of EED - a core subunit of the histone methylating Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) - on ES cell chromatin and function. ES cells lacking EED showed loss of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) accompanied by increased histone acetylation and reduced H3K9me3 levels. Despite typical ES cell morphology and pluripotency marker expression, EED knockout (KO) ES cells exhibited altered nuclear heterochromatin organization, delayed chromatin mobility and a failure in proper differentiation. Conclusively, my data provide insights into the epigenetic regulation of stem cells. Particularly, the results suggest that HDAC inhibitor treatment was detrimental for differentiated BM as well as for differentiated ES cells and that ES cells after 3 days of differentiation had lost pluripotency. Further, the data demonstrate that EED KO ES cells self renewed, exhibited morphology and pluripotency marker expression similar to wild type ES cells, but failed to differentiate. This indicates an important role of EED not only for undifferentiated but also for differentiating ES cells.