Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (7)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (7)
Keywords
- Transkription (7) (remove)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (7) (remove)
The Gram-negative, spiral-shaped, microaerophilic bacterium Helicobacter pylori is the causative agent of various disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as chronic superficial gastritis, chronic active gastritis, peptic ulceration and adenocarcinoma. Although many of the bacterial factors associated with disease development have been analysed in some detail in the recent years, very few studies have focused so far on the mechanisms that regulate expression of these factors at the molecular level. In an attempt to obtain an overview of the basic mechanisms of virulence gene expression in H. pylori, three important virulence factors of this pathogen, representative of different pathogenic mechanisms and different phases of the infectious process, are investigated in detail in the present thesis regarding their transcriptional regulation. As an essential factor for the early phase of infection, including the colonisation of the gastric mucosa, the flagella are analysed; the chaperones including the putative adhesion factors GroEL and DnaK are investigated as representatives of the phase of adherence to the gastric epithelium and persistence in the mucus layer; and finally the cytotoxin associated antigen CagA is analysed as representative of the cag pathogenicity island, which is supposed to account for the phenomena of chronic inflammation and tissue damage observed in the later phases of infection. RNA analyses and in vitro transcription demonstrate that a single promoter regulates expression of cagA, while two promoters are responsible for expression of the upstream divergently transcribed cagB gene. All three promoters are shown to be recognised by RNA polymerase containing the vegetative sigma factor sigma 80. Promoter deletion analyses establish that full activation of the cagA promoter requires sequences up to -70 and binding of the C-terminal portion of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase to an UP-like element located between -40 and -60, while full activation of the major cagB promoter requires sequences upstream of -96 which overlap with the cagA promoter. These data suggest that the promoters of the pathogenicity island represent a class of minimum promoters, that ensure a basic level of transcription, while full activation requires regulatory elements or structural DNA binding proteins that provide a suitable DNA context. Regarding flagellar biosynthesis, a master transcriptional factor is identified that regulates expression of a series of flagellar basal body and hook genes in concert with the alternative sigma factor sigma 54. Evidence is provided that this regulator, designated FlgR (for flagellar regulatory protein), is necessary for motility and transcription of five promoters for seven basal body and hook genes. In addition, FlgR is shown to act as a repressor of transcription of the sigma 28-regulated promoter of the flaA gene, while changes in DNA topology are shown to affect transcription of the sigma 54-regulated flaB promoter. These data indicate that the regulatory network that governs flagellar gene expression in H. pylori shows similarities to the systems of both Salmonella spp. and Caulobacter crescentus. In contrast to the flagellar genes which are regulated by three different sigma factors, the three operons encoding the major chaperones of H. pylori are shown to be transcribed by RNA polymerase containing the vegetative sigma factor sigma 80. Expression of these operons is shown to be regulated negatively by the transcriptional repressor HspR, a homologue of a repressor protein of Streptomyces spp., known to be involved in negative regulation of heat shock genes. In vitro studies with purified recombinant HspR establish that the protein represses transcription by binding to large DNA regions centered around the transcription initiation site in the case of one promoter, and around -85 and -120 in the case of the the other two promoters. In contrast to the situation in Streptomyces, where transcription of HspR-regulated genes is induced in response to heat shock, transcription of the HspR-dependent genes in H. pylori is not inducible with thermal stimuli. Transcription of two of the three chaperone encoding operons is induced by osmotic shock, while transcription of the third operon, although HspR-dependent, is not affected by salt treatment. Taken together, the analyses carried out indicate that H. pylori has reduced its repertoire of specific regulatory proteins to a basic level that may ensure coordinate regulation of those factors that are necessary during the initial phase of infection including the passage through the gastric lumen and the colonisation of the gastric mucosa. The importance of DNA topology and/or context for transcription of many virulence gene promoters may on the other hand indicate, that a sophisticated global regulatory network is present in H. pylori, which influences transcription of specific subsets of virulence genes in response to changes in the microenvironment.
Die Gattung Listeria umfasst sechs bekannte Arten ubiquitär vorkommender Gram-positiver, nicht sporulierender Stäbchenbakterien. Von diesen Spezies sind Listeria monocytogenes und L. ivanovii in der Lage bei Mensch und Tier das Krankheitsbild der Listeriose zu verursachen (Rocourt & Seeliger, 1985; Vázquez-Boland et al., 2001b; Weis & Seeliger, 1975), wobei L. ivanovii vorwiegend bei Tieren als Krankheitserreger vorkommt (Cummins et al., 1994; Hof & Hefner, 1988). L. monocytogenes gilt als wichtiges Modell für ein intrazelluläres Pathogen, das mit Hilfe seiner Internaline auch in nicht-professionelle Phagozyten invadieren (Gaillard et al., 1991; Lingnau et al., 1995) und sich dank einer Reihe weiterer Virulenzfaktoren im Zytoplasma vermehren, fortbewegen und Nachbarzellen infizieren kann (Tilney & Portnoy, 1989). Die beiden pathogenen Arten und das apathogene L. seeligeri besitzen eine als LIPI-1 bezeichnete Pathogenitätsinsel (Gouin et al., 1994; Kreft et al., 2002). Internalingene sind bei L. monocytogenes teilweise geclustert und bei L. ivanovii zu einem großen Teil in einer LIPI-2 genannten Pathogenitätsinsel organisiert (Domínguez-Bernal et al., 2006; Dramsi et al., 1997; Gaillard et al., 1991; Raffelsbauer et al., 1998). Die Expression vieler dieser Virulenzgene wird durch das zentrale Regulatorprotein PrfA gesteuert, dessen Gen prfA selbst Teil der LIPI-1 ist (Domínguez-Bernal et al., 2006; Leimeister-Wächter et al., 1990; Lingnau et al., 1995; Mengaud et al., 1991a). Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit sollten die Internaline InlC, InlE, InlG und InlH von L. monocytogenes näher untersucht werden. Dazu wurden rekombinante His6-markierte Internaline aufgereinigt und polyklonale Antiseren gegen die Internaline A, B, E, G und H hergestellt. Darüber hinaus gelang die Herstellung zweier monoklonaler Antikörper gegen InlG. Obwohl die Antikörper gegen InlG und InlE ihre rekombinanten Antigene gut dekorieren, konnten mit ihnen keine Proteine in Zellwand- oder Überstandspräparaten von L. monocytogenes EGD und EGDe detektiert werden. Das Antiserum gegen InlH kreuzreagierte mit InlA und auch schwach mit anderen Internalinen. In Zellwandpräparaten von L. monocytogenes dekorierte es ein ~50 kDa schweres Protein, welches mit InlH identisch sein könnte. Es fehlt in inlG/H/E Deletionsmutanten und wird in einer inlA/B Deletionsmutante stärker exprimiert. Im Kulturüberstand ist es etwas schwerer, wie man es von einem Protein mit LPXTG Motiv erwartet, das nicht von Sortase (Bierne et al., 2002; Garandeau et al., 2002) prozessiert wurde. In L. monocytogenes EGDe wird dieses ~50 kDa Protein um ein bis zwei dekadische Größenordungen stärker exprimiert als in L. monocytogenes EGD. Die Expression des Proteins war bei 30 und 37 °C gleich stark und wurde nicht durch PrfA reguliert. In Zellwandpräparaten von L. ivanovii ATCC 19119 dekorierten die Seren gegen InlA und InlH ein Protein das in seiner Größe dem InlA von L. monocytogenes entspricht. Mit Hexosaminidase Assays zur Untersuchung von Zelladhärenz (nach Landegren, 1984) an rekombinante His6-markierte Internaline konnte keine Interaktion der Internaline InlE, InlG oder InlH mit Oberflächenfaktoren von Caco-2, HeLa oder HepG2 Zellen nachgewiesen werden, während Positivkontrollen mit InlA und InlB weitestgehend erwartungsgemäß ausfielen. InlC besitzt jedoch offenbar einen bisher noch nicht genauer identifizierten Rezeptor auf der Zelloberfläche. An InlC und EGF adhärierten Caco-2 Zellen stark wachstumsphasenabhängig und etwa tausendfach schwächer als an InlA. Die beste Bindung erfolgte bei semikonfluent gewachsenen Zellen, die am Vortag ausgesät wurden. Unter diesen Bedingungen war auch die von Bergmann et al. beobachtete unterstützende Wirkung von InlC auf die InlA-abhängige Invasion am größten (Bergmann et al., 2002). In dieser Arbeit wurden außerdem die Promotoren von Internalingenen aus L. ivanovii, sowie weitere Virulenzgene (plcA, hly, actA) der Spezies L. monocytogenes, L. ivanovii und L. seeligeri mit Hilfe eines zellfreien in vitro Transkriptionssystems (Lalic-Mülthaler et al., 2001) untersucht, um deren PrfA-Abhängigkeit und Aktivität unabhängig von physiologischen Faktoren analysieren zu können, da die PrfA-Aktivität in vivo pleiotrop reguliert wird (Dickneite et al., 1998; Ermolaeva et al., 2004; Milenbachs et al., 1997; Milenbachs Lukowiak et al., 2004; Renzoni et al., 1997; Ripio et al., 1996). Dafür wurde in dieser Arbeit RNA-Polymerase aus L. monocytogenes ΔprfA ΔsigB (Stritzker et al., 2005) isoliert. Gleichzeitig wurde die Aktivität von rekombinanten His6-markierten PrfA Proteinen untersucht. Dazu wurden die PrfA Proteine von L. monocytogenes (m-PrfA und hyperaktives m-PrfA* (Ripio et al., 1997b)), L. ivanovii (i-PrfA) und L. seeligeri (s-PrfA), so wie ein Hybridprotein (sm-PrfA) aufgereinigt. Das Hybridprotein sm-PrfA entspricht s-PrfA bis auf die letzten 38 Aminosäurereste, die durch jene von m-PrfA ersetzt wurden. ...
Das humane LIN-9 wurde zuerst als pRB-interagierendes Protein beschrieben und spielt eine Rolle als Tumorsuppressor im Kontext des pRB-Signalweges. Über die molekulare Funktion von LIN-9 ist jedoch wenig bekannt. Die Homologe von LIN-9 in D. melanogaster und in C. elegans, sind an der transkriptionellen Regulation verschiedener Genen beteiligt. Dies und die Tatsache, dass LIN-9 mit pRB in der Aktivierung differenzierungspezifischer Gene kooperiert, ließ vermuten, dass humanes LIN-9 einen bedeutenden Einfluss auf die transkriptionelle Regulation von Genen haben könnte. Primäres Ziel dieser Arbeit war daher die Identifizierung LIN-9 regulierter Gene. Dazu sollte mit Hilfe von cDNA-Microarray Analysen, das Genexpressionsprofil LIN-9 depletierter primärer humaner Fibroblasten (BJ ET Zellen) im Vergleich zu Kontrollzellen untersucht werden. Hierfür wurde zunächst ein RNAi-basierendes System etabliert, um die posttranskriptionelle Expression von LIN-9 in BJ-ET Zellen effizient zu reprimieren. Auf dem Ergebnis der cDNA-Microarray Analysen aufbauende Untersuchungen sollten Aufschluss über die molekularbiologische Funktion von LIN-9 geben. In dieser Arbeit konnte erstmals gezeigt werden, dass der Verlust von LIN-9 zu einer verminderten Expression einer Gruppe G2/M-spezifischer Gene führt, deren Produkte für den Eintritt in die Mitose benötigt werden. Bekannt war, dass ein Teil dieser Gene durch den Transkriptionsfaktor B-MYB koreguliert wird. Zudem konnten Untersuchungen in unserem Labor eine Interaktion von LIN-9 und B-MYB auf Proteinebene, sowie die Bindung beider Proteine an die Promotoren der LIN-9 regulierten G2/M-Gene nachweisen. Dies lässt vermuten, dass LIN-9 und B-MYB gemeinsam die Expression der G2/M-Gene kontrollieren. Die verminderte Expression von G2/M-Genen in LIN-9 bzw. B-MYB depletierten Zellen geht mit einer Reihe phänotypischer Veränderungen einher, wie einer deutlich verlangsamten Proliferation und einer Akkumulation der Zellen in der G2/M-Phase. Mit Hilfe eines Durchflusszytometers erstellte Zellzykluskinetiken ergaben, dass die Progression LIN-9 bzw. B-MYB depletierter Fibroblasten von der S-Phase durch die G2/M-Phase und in die nächste G1-Phase deutlich verzögert ist. Es konnte weder ein Arrest dieser Zellen in der Mitose noch eine veränderte Länge der S-Phase nach LIN-9 oder B-MYB Depletion festgestellt werden. Daher ist die verlangsamte Zellzyklusprogression nach LIN-9 bzw. B-MYB Verlust höchstwahrscheinlich auf einen Defekt in der späten G2-Phase zurückzuführen, welcher in einem verzögerten Eintritt in die Mitose resultiert. In D. melanogaster und in C. elegans sind die Homologe von LIN-9 und B-MYB zusammen, als Bestandteile hoch konservierter RB/E2F-Komplexe, an der Regulation von Genen entscheidend beteiligt. Daher liegt es nahe, dass im humanen System LIN-9 und B MYB ebenfalls Bestandteile eines ähnlichen Komplexes sind und dadurch die Aktivierung der LIN 9 abhängigen G2/M-Gene vermitteln. Die Tatsache, dass LIN-9 sowohl als Tumorsuppressor, als auch als positiver Regulator des Zellzyklus fungiert, lässt vermuten, dass LIN-9 zu einer stetig größer werdenden Gruppe von Proteinen gehört, welche in Abhängigkeit vom zellulären und genetischen Kontext sowohl tumorsuppressive als auch onkogene Funktionen besitzen.
Regulated progression through the cell cycle is essential for ordered cell proliferation. One of the best characterized tumor suppressors is the retinoblastoma protein pRB, which together with the E2F transcription factors regulates cell cycle progression. In the model organisms Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, RB/E2F containing multiprotein complexes have been described as transcriptional regulators of gene expression. This work first describes a homologous complex in human cells named LINC (for LIN complex). It consists of a stable core complex containing LIN-9, LIN-37, LIN-52, LIN-54 and RbAp48. This core complex interacts cell cycle-dependently with different pocket proteins and transcription factors. In quiescent cells, LINC associates with p130 and E2F4. In S-phase cells these interactions are lost and LINC binds to B-MYB and p107. The transient knock-down of LIN-54 in primary fibroblasts, as the depletion of LIN-9, leads to cell cycle defects. The cells are delayed before the entry into mitosis. This effect is due to the fact that the knock-down of LINC components leads to the downregulation of cell cycle genes responsible for the entry into and exit from mitosis as well as for checkpoints during mitosis. These LINC target genes are known E2F G2/M target genes, which are expressed later than the classical G1/S E2F target genes. The transcriptional regulation by LINC is a direct effect as LINC binds to the promoters of its target genes throughout the cell cycle. LINC contains three DNA-binding proteins. E2F4 and B-MYB, which cell cycle-dependently bind to LINC, are known DNA-binding transcription factors. Additionally, it is show here that the LINC core complex member LIN-54 also directly binds to the promoter of a LINC target gene. Although the exact molecular mechanism of LINC function needs to be analyzed further, data in this work provide a model for the delayed activation of G2/M target genes. B-MYB, a G1/S E2F target gene, binds to LINC upon its expression in S-phase. Then only LINC is a transcriptional activator that induces the expression of the G2/M genes. This provides an explanation for the delayed expression of these E2F G2/M target genes.
New insights into the histone variant H2A.Z incorporation pathway in \(Trypanosoma\) \(brucei\)
(2022)
The histone variant H2A.Z is a key player in transcription regulation in eukaryotes. Histone acetylations by the NuA4/TIP60 complex are required to enable proper incorporation of the histone variant and to promote the recruitment of other complexes and proteins required for transcription initiation. The second key player in H2A.Z-mediated transcription is the chromatin remodelling complex SWR1, which replaces the canonical histone H2A with its variant. By the time this project started little was known about H2A.Z in the unicellular parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Like in other eukaryotes H2A.Z was exclusively found in the transcription start sites of the polycistronic transcription units where it keeps the chromatin in an open conformation to enable RNA-polymerase II-mediated transcription. Previous studies showed the variant colocalizing with an acetylation of lysine on histone H4 and a methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3. Data indicated that HAT2 is linked to H2A.Z since it is required for acetylation of lyinse 10 on histone H4. A SWR1-like complex and a complex homologous to the NuA4/TIP60 could not be identified yet. This study aimed at identifying a SWR1-like remodelling complex in T. brucei and at identifying a protein complex orthologous to NuA4/TIP60 as well as at answering the question whether HAT2 is part of this complex or not. To this end, I performed multiple mass spectrometry-coupled co-Immunoprecipitation assays with potential subunits of a SWR1 complex, HAT2 and a putative homolog of a NuA4/TIP60 subunit. In the course of these experiments, I was able to identify the TbSWR1 complex. Subsequent cell fractionation and chromatin immunoprecipitation-coupled sequencing analysis experiments confirmed, that this complex is responsible for the incorporation of the histone variant H2A.Z in T. brucei. In addition to this chromatin remodelling complex, I was also able to identify two histone acetyltransferase complexes assembled around HAT1 and HAT2. In the course of my study data were published by the research group of Nicolai Siegel that identified the histone acetyltransferase HAT2 as being responsible for histone H4 acetylation, in preparation to promote H2A.Z incorporation. The data also indicated that HAT1 is responsible for acetylation of H2A.Z. According to the literature, this acetylation is required for proper transcription initiation. Experimental data generated in this study indicated, that H2A.Z and therefore TbSWR1 is involved in the DNA double strand break response of T. brucei. The identification of the specific complex composition of all three complexes provided some hints about how they could interact with each other in the course of transcription regulation and the DNA double strand break response. A proximity labelling approach performed with one of the subunits of the TbSWR1 complex identified multiple transcription factors, PTM writers and proteins potentially involved in chromatin maintenance. Overall, this work will provide some interesting insights about the composition of the complexes involved in H2A.Z incorporation in T. brucei. Furthermore, it is providing valuable information to set up experiments that could shed some light on RNA-polymerase II-mediated transcription and chromatin remodelling in T. brucei in particular and Kinetoplastids in general.
A novel USP11-TCEAL1-mediated mechanism protects transcriptional elongation by RNA Polymerase II
(2024)
Deregulated expression of MYC oncoproteins is a driving event in many human cancers. Therefore, understanding and targeting MYC protein-driven mechanisms in tumor biology remain a major challenge.
Oncogenic transcription in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma leads to the formation of the MYCN-BRCA1-USP11 complex that terminates transcription by evicting stalling RNAPII from chromatin. This reduces cellular stress and allows reinitiation of new rounds of transcription. Basically, tumors with amplified MYC genes have a high demand on well orchestration of transcriptional processes-dependent and independent from MYC proteins functions in gene regulation. To date, the cooperation between promoter-proximal termination and transcriptional elongation in cancer cells remains still incomplete in its understanding.
In this study the putative role of the dubiquitinase Ubiquitin Specific Protease 11 (USP11) in transcription regulation was further investigated. First, several USP11 interaction partners involved in transcriptional regulation in neuroblastoma cancer cells were identified. In particular, the transcription elongation factor A like 1 (TCEAL1) protein, which assists USP11 to engage protein-protein interactions in a MYCN-dependent manner, was characterized. The data clearly show that TCEAL1 acts as a pro-transcriptional factor for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-medi- ated transcription. In detail, TCEAL1 controls the transcription factor S-II (TFIIS), a factor that assists RNAPII to escape from paused sites. The findings claim that TCEAL1 outcompetes the transcription elongation factor TFIIS in a non-catalytic manner on chromatin of highly expressed genes. This is reasoned by the need regulating TFIIS function in transcription. TCEAL1 equili- brates excessive backtracking and premature termination of transcription caused by TFIIS.
Collectively, the work shed light on the stoichiometric control of TFIIS demand in transcriptional regulation via the USP11-TCEAL1-USP7 complex. This complex protects RNAPII from TFIIS-mediated termination helping to regulate productive transcription of highly active genes in neuroblastoma.
The expression of the MYC proto-oncogene is elevated in a large proportion of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Previous findings in PDAC have shown that this increased MYC expression mediates immune evasion and promotes S-phase progression. How these functions are mediated and whether a downstream factor of MYC mediates these functions has remained elusive. Recent studies identifying the MYC interactome revealed a complex network of interaction partners, highlighting the need to identify the oncogenic pathway of MYC in an unbiased manner.
In this work, we have shown that MYC ensures genomic stability during S-phase and prevents transcription-replication conflicts. Depletion of MYC and inhibition of ATR kinase showed a synergistic effect to induce DNA damage. A targeted siRNA screen targeting downstream factors of MYC revealed that PAF1c is required for DNA repair and S-phase progression. Recruitment of PAF1c to RNAPII was shown to be MYC dependent. PAF1c was shown to be largely dispensable for cell proliferation and regulation of MYC target genes.
Depletion of CTR9, a subunit of PAF1c, caused strong tumor regression in a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma model, with long-term survival in a subset of mice. This effect was not due to induction of DNA damage, but to restoration of tumor immune surveillance.
Depletion of PAF1c resulted in the release of RNAPII with transcription elongation factors, including SPT6, from the bodies of long genes, promoting full-length transcription of short genes. This resulted in the downregulation of long DNA repair genes and the concomitant upregulation of short genes, including MHC class I genes. These data demonstrate that a balance between long and short gene transcription is essential for tumor progression and that interference with PAF1c levels shifts this balance toward a tumor-suppressive transcriptional program. It also directly links MYC-mediated S-phase progression to immune evasion. Unlike MYC, PAF1c has a stable, known folded structure; therefore, the development of a small molecule targeting PAF1c may disrupt the immune evasive function of MYC while sparing its physiological functions in cellular growth.