Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (1)
Year of publication
- 2013 (1) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Keywords
- Wespen (1) (remove)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1) (remove)
Within the last decades, land use intensification reduced the heterogeneity of habitats and landscapes. The resulting pauperization led to habitats and landscapes that are spatially or temporally limited in food and nesting resources for solitary bees and wasps. Hence, biodiversity and ecosystem processes are seriously threatened. The impacts of changing resource conditions for valuable pollinators and (pest) predators remain poorly studied as well as their top-down regulation by natural enemies. Further, the reproductive success of solitary bees as response to changed resource distribution within foraging ranges is rarely examined. We considered trap-nesting bees, wasps and their antagonists as suitable model organisms to fill these gaps of knowledge, since trap nests provide insight into otherwise hidden trophic interactions, like parasitism and predation, as well as ecological processes, like pollination and reproduction. Moreover, trap-nesting species are established as essential biodiversity indicator taxa. Thus, we first asked in Chapter II how the reproduction of cavity-nesting bees and wasps in grasslands depends on local management Moreover, we tested land use effects on the effectiveness of two groups of antagonists in regulating bee and wasp populations by excluding ground-dwelling antagonists. We characterized nest closure type to determine their protective function against antagonist attacks. In a highly replicated, large-scaled study, we provided 95 grassland sites in three geographic regions in Germany with 760 trap-nests. The full factorial design comprised mown and unmown plots as well as plots with and without access of ground-dwelling predators to the trap nests. The colonization of bees and wasps was unaffected by ground-dwelling antagonists. However, excluding ground-dwellers enhanced the attack rate of flying antagonists. Experimental mowing marginally affected the colonization of wasps but not attack rates. Nevertheless, both treatments – mowing and predator exclusion – significantly interacted. The exclusion of ground-dwellers on mown plots resulted in higher attack rates of flying antagonists, whereas on unmown plots this effect of ground-dweller-exclusion on the attack rate of flying antagonists was not visible. Further, attack rates were determined by nest closure material, local abundance of different nest closure types as well as closure-associated antagonist species. In Chapter III, we studied the relative impact of local land use intensity, landscape composition and configuration on the species richness and abundance of bees, wasps and their antagonists. We analysed abundances and species numbers of hosts and their antagonists as well as parasitism rate and conducted a comprehensive landscape mapping. The digitized landscape data were the basis for further calculations of landscape metrics, like landscape composition and configuration within eight spatial scales ranging from 250 to 2,000 m radii. We used a compound, additive index of local land use intensity. Host abundance was only marginally negatively affected by local land use intensity. However, landscape composition at small spatial scales enhanced the species richness and abundance of hosts, while species richness and abundance of antagonists was positively related to landscape configuration at larger spatial scales. In the last study, presented in Chapter IV, we observed nesting bees on a selection of 18 grassland sites in two of the three research regions. We estimated the importance of resource distribution for pollen-nectar trips and consequences for the reproductive success of the solitary Red Mason Bee (Osmia bicornis). Local land use intensity, local flower cover as well as landscape composition and configuration were considered as critical factors of influence. We equipped each grassland site with eight trap nests and 50 female bees. Different nest building activities, like foraging trips for pollen and nectar, were measured. After the nesting season, we calculated measures of reproductive success. Foraging trips for pollen and nectar were significantly shorter in spatially complex landscapes but were neither affected by local metrics nor landscape composition. We found no evidence that the duration of pollen-nectar trips determines the reproductive success. Thus, to maintain trophic interactions and biodiversity, local land use as well as landscape diversity and spatial complexity should be accounted for to create spatial and temporal stability of food and nesting resources within small spatial scales. Concrete steps to support pollinator populations include hedges, sown field margins or other linear elements. These measures that enhance the connectivity of landscapes can also support flying antagonists.