Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Year of publication
- 2009 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Keywords
- Phosphorylierung (3) (remove)
Members of the enabled/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (Ena/VASP) family are important regulators of the actin cytoskeleton dynamics. VASP functions as well as its interactions with other proteins are regulated by phosphorylation at three sites - serine157 (S157), serine239 (S239), and threonine278 (T278) in humans. cAMP- and cGMP- dependent protein kinases phosphorylate S157 and S239, respectively. In contrast, the kinase responsible for T278 was as yet unknown and identified in the first part of this thesis. In a screen for T278 phosphorylating kinases using a phospho-specific antibody against phosphorylated T278 AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) was identified in endothelial cells. Mutants of AMPK with altered kinase-activity modulate T278-phosphorylation levels in cells. AMPK-driven T278-phosphorylation impaired stress fiber formation and changed cell morphology in living cells. AMPK is a fundamental sensor of cellular and whole body energy homeostasis. Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats, which are an animal model for type II diabetes mellitus, were used to analyze the impact of phosphorylated T278 in vivo. AMPK-activity and T278-phosphorylation were substantially reduced in arterial vessel walls of ZDF rats in comparison to control animals. These findings demonstrate that VASP is a new AMPK substrate, that VASP phosphorylation mediates the effects of metabolic regulation on actin cytoskeleton rearrangements, and that this signaling system becomes down-regulated in diabetic vessel disorders in rats. In the second part of this thesis, a functional analysis of differential VASP phosphorylations was performed. To systematically address VASP phosphorylation patterns, a set of VASP phosphomimetic mutants was cloned. These mutants enable the mimicking of defined phosphorylation patterns and the specific analysis of single kinase-mediated phosphorylations. VASP localization to the cell periphery was increased by S157- phosphorylation and modulated by phosphorylation at S239 and T278. Latter phosphorylations synergistically reduced actin polymerization. In contrast, S157- phosphorylation had no effect on actin-dynamics. Taken together, the results of the second part show that phosphorylation of VASP serves as a fine regulator of localization and actin polymerization activity. In summary, this study revealed the functions of VASP phosphorylations and established novel links between signaling pathways and actin cytoskeleton rearrangement.
Phosducin-like Protein existiert in zwei Splicevarianten: PhLPLONG (PhLPL) und PhLPSHORT (PhLPS). Sie unterscheiden sich in der Länge ihres N-Terminus und in ihrem Expressionsmusters: Die lange Form (PhLPL) wird ubiquitär exprimiert und bindet G-Protein-betagamma-Untereinheiten (Gbetagama), was zur Hemmung von Gbetagamma-abhängigen Funktionen führt. Der um 83 Aminosäuren verlängerte N-Terminus besitzt ein hoch konserviertes Motiv, welches für die Gbetagamma-Bindung und Regulation von entscheidender Bedeutung ist. Im Gegensatz hierzu besitzt die kurzen Spliceform PhLPS, deren Expression in verschiedenen Gewebetypen deutlich geringer ist, diese hoch konservierte Region nicht. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde nun erstmals die Rolle von PhLPL und PhLPS bei der Gbetagamma-Regulation in intakten Zellen untersucht. Hierbei konnte überraschenderweise gefunden werden, dass PhLPS der potentere und effizientere Regulator für Gbetagamma-abhängige Signale war. PhLPL hingegen schien in seiner Gbetagamma-regulierenden Fähigkeit limitiert zu werden. Die Ursache dieser Limitierung von PhLPL in intakten Zellen wurde auf eine konstitutive Phosphorylierung seines verlängerten N-Terminus durch die ubiquitäre Casein Kinase 2 (CK2) zurückgeführt. Die verantwortlichen Phosphorylierungsstellen (S18, T19, S20) wurde identifiziert und die Mutation der CK2-Phosphorylierungsstellen (PhLPLA18-20) führte zu einer Verbesserung der hemmenden Funktion von PhLPL in Zellen. In vitro-Assays zur Bindungsfähigkeit von rekombinantem PhLPL (vor und nach CK2-Phosphorylierung) zeigten allerdings: die Phosphorylierung beeinflusste die Affinität nicht. Eine genaue Analyse der N-terminalen Strukuren von PhLPL zeigte indes, dass die Regulationsfähigkeit von PhLPL in intakten Zellen vor allem in dem konservierten Gbetagamma-Bindungsmotiv zu suchen war. Die Mutation einer einzigen Aminosäure (W66V) war ausreichend, um sowohl die Gbetagamma-Bindungsfähigkeit, als auch die Fähigkeit zur funktionellen Hemmung in intakten Zellen zu verlieren. Was war also der Mechanismus der Hemmung von Gbetagamma durch PhLPS und die phophorylierungsdefiziente Mutante von PhLPL? Ein erster Hinweis hierauf kam von der Beobachtung, dass die Gbeta- und Ggamma-Untereinheiten in Anwesenheit von PhLPS in ihrem Proteingehalt deutlich reduziert vorlagen (wie in Western Blots gezeigt). Dieser Mechanismus schien von proteasomalen Abbauwegen abzuhängen (gezeigt durch Effekte des spezifischen Proteasominhibitors Lactazystin). Allerdings schien eine Stabilisierung der Gbeta- und Ggamma-Untereinheiten (durch N-terminale Fusion mit einem Protein zur vitalen Proteinfärbung) nicht die Funktionsfähigkeit von Gbetagamma in Anwesenheit von PhLPS bewahren zu können. Ganz im Gegenteil, es wurde gezeigt, dass Gbeta und Ggamma hierbei nicht mehr zu einem funktionellen Dimer assoziierten. Dies war ein Hinweis darauf, dass möglicherweise Proteinfaltungsmechanismen bei der Regulation essentiell sein könnten. Eine postulierte Rolle bei der Faltung von WD40-Repeatproteinen wie der Gbeta-Untereinheit wurde dem Chaperonin-Komplex CCT (chaperonin containing TCP) zugedacht. Folgerichtig konnte PhLPS mit seinen funktionell aktiven Domänen an endogenes TCP-1alpha (einer Untereinheit von CCT) binden. Ferner konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Hemmung des CCT-Komplexes durch RNA-Interferenz mit TCP-1alpha ebenso wie PhLPS zur spezifischen Reduktion von Gbetagamma führte. In dieser Arbeit wurde also ein neuartiger Mechanismus der G-Protein-Regulation durch Hemmung der Proteinfaltung von Gbetagamma beschrieben. Ein Schaltmechanismus zwischen direkter Gbetagamma-Bindung (induziert durch CK2-Phosphorylierung von PhLPL) und Hemmung der Proteinfaltung von Gbetagamma (induziert durch alternatives Splicen oder durch Dephosphorylierung von PhLP) wird postuliert.
In mammals, the RAF family of serine/threonine kinases consists of three members, A-, B- and C-RAF. Activation of RAF kinases involves a complex series of phosphorylations. Although the most prominent phosphorylation sites of B- and C-RAF are well characterized, little is known about regulatory phosphorylation of A-RAF. Using mass spectrometry, we identified here a number of novel in vivo phosphorylation sites in A-RAF. The physiological role and the function of these sites were investigated subsequently by amino acid exchange at the relevant positions. In particular, we found that S432 participates in MEK binding and is indispensable for A-RAF signaling. On the other hand, phosphorylation within the activation segment does not contribute to epidermal growth factor-mediated activation. Regarding regulation of A-RAF activity by 14-3-3 proteins, we show that A-RAF activity is regulated differentially by its C-terminal and internal 14-3-3 binding domain. Furthermore, by use of SPR technique, we found that 14-3-3 proteins associate with RAF in an isoform-specific manner. Of importance, we identified a novel regulatory domain in A-RAF (referred to as IH-segment) positioned between amino acids 248 and 267, which contains seven putative phosphorylation sites. Three of these sites, serines 257, 262 and 264, regulate A-RAF activation in a stimulatory manner. The spatial model of the A-RAF fragment including residues between S246 and E277 revealed a “switch of charge” at the molecular surface of the IH-region upon phosphorylation, suggesting a mechanism in which the high accumulation of negative charges may lead to an electrostatic destabilization of protein/membrane interaction resulting in depletion of A-RAF from the plasma membrane. Activation of B- and C-RAF is regulated by phosphorylation at conserved residues within the negative-charge regulatory region (N-region). Identification of phosphopeptides covering the sequence of the N-region led to the conclusion that, similar to B- and C-RAF, kinase activity of A-RAF is regulated by phosphorylation of the N-region. Abrogation of A-RAF activity by S299A substitution and elevated activity of the A-RAF-Y301D-Y302D mutant confirmed this conclusion. In addition, we studied the role of the non-conserved residues within the N-region in the activation process of RAF kinases. The non-conserved amino acids in positions –3 and +1 relative to the highly conserved S299 in A-RAF and S338 in C-RAF have so far not been considered as regulatory residues. Here, we demonstrate that Y296R substitution in A-RAF led to a constitutively active kinase. In contrast, G300S substitution (mimicking B- and C-RAF) acts in an inhibitory manner. These data were confirmed by analogous mutations in C-RAF. Based on the three-dimensional structure of the catalytic domain of B-RAF, a tight interaction between the N-region residue S339 and the catalytic domain residue R398 was identified in C-RAF and proposed to inhibit the kinase activity of RAF proteins. Furthermore, Y296 in A-RAF favors a spatial orientation of the N-region segment, which enables a tighter contact to the catalytic domain, whereas a glutamine residue at this position in C-RAF abrogates this interaction. Considering this observation, we suggest that Y296, which is unique for A-RAF, is a major determinant of the low activating potency of this RAF isoform. Finally, the residues R359 in A-RAF and R398 in C-RAF, which interact with the N-region, are also involved in binding of phosphatidic acid. Substitution of this conserved arginine by alanine resulted in accumulation of hyper-phosphorylated form of RAF, suggesting that this residue play a crucial role in phosphorylation-mediated feedback regulation of A- and C-RAF. Collectively, we provide here for the first time a detailed analysis of in vivo A-RAF phosphorylation status and demonstrate that regulation of A-RAF by phosphorylation exhibits unique features compared with B- and C-RAF.