Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (72)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (72)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (65)
- Preprint (4)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
Language
- English (72)
Keywords
- PET (17)
- prostate cancer (13)
- theranostics (13)
- positron emission tomography (11)
- CXCR4 (10)
- PET/CT (10)
- Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie (10)
- PSMA (9)
- multiple myeloma (8)
- neuroendocrine tumor (8)
- radioligand therapy (8)
- PRRT (7)
- molecular imaging (7)
- RADS (4)
- SPECT (4)
- SSTR (4)
- somatostatin receptor (4)
- 18F-DCFPyL (3)
- DaTscan (3)
- FDG (3)
- NET (3)
- PSMA-RADS (3)
- Prostate Cancer (3)
- adrenocortical carcinoma (3)
- chemokine receptor (3)
- endoradiotherapy (3)
- medicine (3)
- peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (3)
- prostate-specific membrane antigen (3)
- 18F-FDG (2)
- 18F-FDG PET/CT (2)
- C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (2)
- Ioflupane (2)
- MAG3 (2)
- PSMA I&T (2)
- PSMA-PET (2)
- Parkinson (2)
- Parkinson Disease (2)
- Parkinson-Krankheit (2)
- Parkinson’s disease (2)
- Positron Emission Tomography (2)
- SSTR-RADS (2)
- SUV (2)
- TKI (2)
- Virchow Node (2)
- [177Lu]-DOTATATE/-DOTATOC (2)
- [68Ga] (2)
- [68Ga]PentixaFor (2)
- bone disease (2)
- fibroblast activation protein (2)
- lymphoma (2)
- personalized medicine (2)
- prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (2)
- radionuclide therapy (2)
- reporting and data system (2)
- salvage radiotherapy (2)
- tumor heterogeneity (2)
- vandetanib (2)
- 11C-Methionine PET/CT (1)
- 123I-Ioflupane (1)
- 177Lu (1)
- 18-F-fluorothymidine uptake (1)
- 18F-DCFPL (1)
- 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose (1)
- 68Ga-DOTANOC (1)
- 68Ga-DOTATATE (1)
- 68Ga-DOTATOC (1)
- 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT (1)
- <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (1)
- <sup>68</sup>Ga-Pentixafor (1)
- Arginine (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- CTCAE (1)
- CXCR4-targeting (1)
- CXCR4/SDF-1 (1)
- CYP11B enzymes (1)
- DLBCL (1)
- DNA repair (1)
- DOTA-EB-TATE (1)
- DOTATOC (1)
- DSB damage (1)
- FDG PET/CT (1)
- FDG-PET (1)
- FLT-PET (1)
- GCA (1)
- GPR54 (1)
- Ganglia (1)
- HMDP hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (1)
- Hyperkalaemia (1)
- IBA-1 (1)
- IMAZA (1)
- Imaging pitfalls (1)
- KISS1 receptor (1)
- KISS1-54 (1)
- Lysine (1)
- MI-RADS (1)
- MRI (1)
- Merkel cell carcinoma (1)
- Molecular imaging (1)
- Myocardial-perfusion SPECT (1)
- NEC (1)
- NVP-BGT226 (1)
- PMR (1)
- PROMISE (1)
- PSA (1)
- PSA response (1)
- PSMA PET/CT (1)
- PSMA-617 (1)
- PSMA-TV (1)
- PSMA‐617 (1)
- Pancreas (1)
- Parkinsonism (1)
- Pentixafor (1)
- Pitfall (1)
- Positron emission tomography (1)
- Prostata (1)
- RLT (1)
- Radiofluorine (1)
- Radiotracer (1)
- SARS-CoV-2 (1)
- SPECT/CT (1)
- SSTR-PET (1)
- Single-Photon-Emissions-Computertomographie (1)
- Somatostatin receptor expression (1)
- TBI (1)
- TSPO (1)
- Tracer (1)
- [177Lu]/[90Y]PentixaTher (1)
- [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (1)
- [177Lu]PentixaTher (1)
- [18F]FDG PET/CT (1)
- [18F]Fluorodeoxythymidine (1)
- [68Ga]DOTATOC (1)
- [68Ga]Pentixafor (1)
- [90Y]PentixaTher (1)
- [\(^{68}\)Ga] pentixafor (1)
- [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-FAPI (1)
- [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor (1)
- [\(^{68}\)]KISS1-54 (1)
- \(^{11}\)C-Methionine-PET (1)
- \(^{11}\)C-methionine (1)
- \(^{177}\)Lu (1)
- \(^{18}\)F (1)
- \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT (1)
- \(^{18}\)F-PSMA-1007 (1)
- \(^{68}\)Ga (1)
- \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor (1)
- adrenal incidentaloma (1)
- ageing (1)
- agreement (1)
- amino acids (1)
- attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (1)
- autologous transplantation (1)
- autoradiography (1)
- biokinetics (1)
- biomarker (1)
- bone-marrow (1)
- cancer (1)
- cancer treatment (1)
- caudate nucleus (1)
- cells (1)
- chemokine receptor-4 (1)
- cholinergic activity (1)
- combination (1)
- comparability (1)
- diffuse (1)
- dopamine transporter (DAT) (1)
- early response (1)
- ejection fraction (1)
- esophagogastric junction (1)
- evans blue (1)
- experience (1)
- flare phenomenon (1)
- focal (1)
- follicular lymphoma (1)
- giant cell arteritis (1)
- glioblastoma (1)
- glioblastoma multiforme (1)
- glioma (1)
- head and neck cancer (1)
- health care (1)
- hematotoxicity (1)
- human tumor cell lines (1)
- hyperkalemia (1)
- imaging (1)
- imaging proliferation (1)
- imaging techniques (1)
- immunohistochemistry (1)
- immunostaining (1)
- in vivo imaging (1)
- in-vivo (1)
- inflammation (1)
- inhibition (1)
- interobserver (1)
- interreader (1)
- intraindividual comparison (1)
- involvement (1)
- irradiation (1)
- isotopes (1)
- kidney function (1)
- kisspeptin (1)
- late response (1)
- left-ventricular function (1)
- levodopa-induced dyskinesia (1)
- macrophages (1)
- macroscopic recurrence (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- malignancies (1)
- mammalian target of rapamycin (1)
- management (1)
- matched pair (1)
- medullary thyroid carcinoma (1)
- metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (1)
- metabolic tumour volume (MTV) (1)
- methionine (1)
- methylphenidate (1)
- microenvironment (1)
- microglial cells (1)
- mouse (1)
- nephrotoxicity (1)
- neuroendocrine neoplasia (1)
- neuroinflammation (1)
- non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (1)
- non-hodgkins-lymphoma (1)
- ollimator (1)
- overall survival (1)
- pancreas (1)
- papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) (1)
- pattern (1)
- peptide receptor (1)
- phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (1)
- photons (1)
- pleural mesothelioma (1)
- polymyalgia rheumatica (1)
- positron emission tomography/computed tomography (1)
- post-reconstruction filtering (1)
- prediction (1)
- progression (1)
- quality (1)
- quantification (1)
- radiogenomics (1)
- radioiodine (1)
- recurrence (1)
- relapse (1)
- renal scintigraphy (1)
- repair (1)
- reporting and data systems (1)
- responsivity (1)
- sarcoidosis (1)
- scanner (1)
- selpercatinib (1)
- signal to noise ratio (1)
- signaling pathway (1)
- simultaneous integrated boost (1)
- single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (1)
- skeletal (1)
- small animal SPECT (1)
- small-animal imaging (1)
- smoldering myeloma (1)
- software (1)
- solid tumors (1)
- somatostatin (1)
- somatostatin receptor (SSTR) (1)
- somatostatin receptors (1)
- staging (1)
- standardization (1)
- standardized reporting (1)
- standardized reporting system (1)
- stem-cell transplantation (1)
- striatum (1)
- super ultraviolet (1)
- survival (1)
- target (1)
- taxane (1)
- thyroid carcinoma (TC) (1)
- thyroid carcinomas (1)
- total lesion PSMA (1)
- total lesion glycolysis (TLG) (1)
- total lesion methionine uptake (TLMU) (1)
- treatment response (1)
- tumor (1)
- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (1)
- vasculature (1)
- vasculitis (1)
- vestibular schwannoma (1)
- weight drop (1)
- α-Particle (1)
- γ-H2AX (1)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin (72) (remove)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) has been reported to be overexpressed in glioblastoma (GBM) and to be associated with poor survival. This study investigated the feasibility of non-invasive CXCR4-directed imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using the radiolabelled chemokine receptor ligand \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor.
15 patients with clinical suspicion on primary or recurrent glioblastoma (13 primary, 2 recurrent tumors) underwent \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT for assessment of CXCR4 expression prior to surgery. O-(2-\(^{18}\)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (\(^{18}\)F-FET) PET/CT images were available in 11/15 cases and were compared visually and semi-quantitatively (SUV\(_{max}\), SUV\(_{mean}\)). Tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated for both PET probes. \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT results were also compared to histological CXCR4 expression on neuronavigated surgical samples.
\(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT was visually positive in 13/15 cases with SUV\(_{mean}\) and SUV\(_{max}\) of 3.0±1.5 and 3.9±2.0 respectively. Respective values for \(^{18}\)F-FET were 4.4±2.0 (SUV\(_{mean}\)) and 5.3±2.3 (SUV\(_{max}\)). TBR for SUV\(_{mean}\) and SUV\(_{max}\) were higher for \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor than for \(^{18}\)F-FET (SUV\(_{mean}\) 154.0±90.7 vs. 4.1±1.3; SUV\(_{max}\) 70.3±44.0 and 3.8±1.2, p<0.01), respectively. Histological analysis confirmed CXCR4 expression in tumor areas with high \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor uptake; regions of the same tumor without apparent \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor uptake showed no or low receptor expression.
In this pilot study, \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor retention has been observed in the vast majority of glioblastoma lesions and served as readout for non-invasive determination of CXCR4 expression. Given the paramount importance of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis in tumor biology, \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT might prove a useful tool for sensitive, non-invasive in-vivo quantification of CXCR4 as well as selection of patients who might benefit from CXCR4-directed therapy.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging for prostate cancer with \(^{68}\)Ga-labeled compounds has rapidly become adopted as part of routine clinical care in many parts of the world. However, recent years have witnessed the start of a shift from \(^{68}\)Ga- to \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds. The latter imaging agents have several key advantages, which may lay the groundwork for an even more widespread adoption into the clinic. First, facilitated delivery from distant suppliers expands the availability of PET radiopharmaceuticals in smaller hospitals operating a PET center but lacking the patient volume to justify an onsite \(^{68}\)Ge/\(^{68}\)Ga generator. Thus, such an approach meets the increasing demand for PSMA-targeted PET imaging in areas with lower population density and may even lead to cost-savings compared to in-house production. Moreover, \(^{18}\)F-labeled radiotracers have a higher positron yield and lower positron energy, which in turn decreases image noise, improves contrast resolution, and maximizes the likelihood of detecting subtle lesions. In addition, the longer half-life of 110 min allows for improved delayed imaging protocols and flexibility in study design, which may further increase diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, such compounds can be distributed to sites which are not allowed to produce radiotracers on-site due to regulatory issues or to centers without access to a cyclotron. In light of these advantageous characteristics, \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted PET radiotracers may play an important role in both optimizing this transformative imaging modality and making it widely available. We have aimed to provide a concise overview of emerging \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers undergoing active clinical development. Given the wide array of available radiotracers, comparative studies are needed to firmly establish the role of the available \(^{18}\)F-labeled compounds in the field of molecular PCa imaging, preferably in different clinical scenarios.
\(^{11}\)C-methionine (\(^{11}\)C-MET) is a new positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for the assessment of disease activity in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with preliminary data suggesting higher sensitivity and specificity than \(^{18}\)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (\(^{18}\)F-FDG). However, the value of tumor burden biomarkers has yet to be investigated. Our goals were to corroborate the superiority of \(^{11}\)C-MET for MM staging and to compare its suitability for the assessment of metabolic tumor burden biomarkers in comparison to \(^{18}\)F-FDG. Twenty-two patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve symptomatic MM who had undergone \(^{11}\)C-MET and \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT were evaluated. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were determined and compared with total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) for both tracers: total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and total lesion \(^{11}\)C-MET uptake (TLMU). PET-derived values were compared to Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), cytogenetic, and serologic MM markers such as M component, beta 2 microglobulin (B2M), serum free light chains (FLC), albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). In 11 patients (50%), \(^{11}\)C-MET detected more focal lesions (FL) than FDG (p < 0.01). SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TMTV, and TLMU were also significantly higher in \(^{11}\)C-MET than in \(^{18}\)F-FDG (p < 0.05, respectively). \(^{11}\)C-MET PET biomarkers had a better correlation with tumor burden (bone marrow plasma cell infiltration, M component; p < 0.05 versus p = n.s. respectively). This pilot study suggests that \(^{11}\)C-MET PET/CT is a more sensitive marker for the assessment of myeloma tumor burden than \(^{18}\)F-FDG. Its implications for prognosis evaluation need further investigation.
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an essentially incurable hematologic malignancy. However, new treatment modalities and novel drugs have been introduced and thus additional tools for therapy monitoring are increasingly needed. Therefore, we evaluated the radiotracers \(^{11}\)C-Methionine (paraprotein-biosynthesis) and \(^{18}\)F-FDG (glucose-utilization) for monitoring response to anti-myeloma-therapy and outcome prediction. Influence of proteasome-inhibition on radiotracer-uptake of different MM cell-lines and patient-derived CD138\(^{+}\) plasma cells was analyzed and related to tumor-biology. Mice xenotransplanted with MM. 1S tumors underwent MET- and FDG-\(\mu\)PET. Tumor-to-background ratios before and after 24 h, 8 and 15 days treatment with bortezomib were correlated to survival. Treatment reduced both MET and FDG uptake; changes in tracer-retention correlated with a switch from high to low CD138-expression. In xenotransplanted mice, MET-uptake significantly decreased by 30-79% as early as 24 h after bortezomib injection. No significant differences were detected thus early with FDG. This finding was confirmed in patient-derived MM cells. Importantly, early reduction of MET-but not FDG-uptake correlated with improved survival and reduced tumor burden in mice. Our results suggest that MET is superior to FDG in very early assessment of response to anti-myeloma-therapy. Early changes in MET-uptake have predictive potential regarding response and survival. MET-PET holds promise to individualize therapies in MM in future.
\(^{11}\)C-methionine-PET in multiple myeloma: a combined study from two different institutions
(2017)
\(^{11}\)C-methionine (MET) has recently emerged as an accurate marker of tumor burden and disease activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This dual-center study aimed at further corroboration of the superiority of MET as positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for staging and re-staging MM, as compared to \(^{18}\)F-2`-deoxy-2`-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG).
78 patients with a history of solitary plasmacytoma (n=4), smoldering MM (SMM, n=5), and symptomatic MM (n=69) underwent both MET- and FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) at the University Centers of Würzburg, Germany and Navarra, Spain. Scans were compared on a patient and on a lesion basis. Inter-reader agreement was also evaluated. In 2 patients, tumor biopsies for verification of discordant imaging results were available.
MET-PET detected focal lesions (FL) in 59/78 subjects (75.6%), whereas FDG-PET/CT showed lesions in only 47 patients (60.3%; p<0.01), accordingly disease activity would have been missed in 12 patients. Directed biopsies of discordant results confirmed MET-PET/CT results in both cases.
MET depicted more FL in 44 patients (56.4%; p<0.01), whereas in two patients (2/78), FDG proved superior. In the remainder (41.0%, 32/78), both tracers yielded comparable results. Inter-reader agreement for MET was higher than for FDG (κ = 0.82 vs κ = 0.72).
This study demonstrates higher sensitivity of MET in comparison to standard FDG to detect intra- and extramedullary MM including histologic evidence of FDG-negative, viable disease exclusively detectable by MET-PET/CT. MET holds the potential to replace FDG as functional imaging standard for staging and re-staging of MM.
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) is a key factor for tumor growth and metastasis in several types of human cancer including multiple myeloma (MM). Proof-of-concept of CXCR4-directed radionuclide therapy in MM has recently been reported. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the CXCR4-directed radiotracer [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor in MM and a potential role for stratifying patients to CXCR4-directed therapies.
Thirty-five patients with MM underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for evaluation of eligibility for endoradiotherapy. In 19/35 cases, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG-PET/CT for correlation was available. Scans were compared on a patient and on a lesion basis. Tracer uptake was correlated with standard clinical parameters of disease activity.
[\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET detected CXCR4-positive disease in 23/35 subjects (66%). CXCR4-positivity at PET was independent from myeloma subtypes, cytogenetics or any serological parameters and turned out as a negative prognostic factor. In the 19 patients in whom a comparison to [\(^{18}\)F]FDG was available, [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET detected more lesions in 4/19 (21%) subjects, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG proved superior in 7/19 (37%). In the remaining 8/19 (42%) patients, both tracers detected an equal number of lesions. [\(^{18}\)F]FDG-PET positivity correlated with [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET positivity (p=0.018).
[\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET provides further evidence that CXCR4 expression frequently occurs in advanced multiple myeloma, representing a negative prognostic factor and a potential target for myeloma specific treatment. However, selecting patients for CXCR4 directed therapies and prognostic stratification seem to be more relevant clinical applications for this novel imaging modality, rather than diagnostic imaging of myeloma.
We have recently demonstrated CXCR4 overexpression in vestibular schwannomas (VS). This study investigated the feasibility of CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging of VS using the radiolabeled chemokine ligand [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor.
Methods: 4 patients with 6 primarily diagnosed or pre-treated/observed VS were enrolled. All subjects underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT prior to surgical resection. Images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively for CXCR4 expression including calculation of tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). Immunohistochemistry served as standard of reference in three patients.
Results: [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT was visually positive in all cases. SUV\(_{mean}\) and SUV\(_{max}\) were 3.0 ± 0.3 and 3.8 ± 0.4 and TBR\(_{mean}\) and TBR\(_{max}\) were 4.0 ± 1.4 and 5.0 ± 1.7, respectively. Histological analysis confirmed CXCR4 expression in tumors.
Conclusion: Non-invasive imaging of CXCR4 expression using [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT of VS is feasible and could prove useful for in vivo assessment of CXCR4 expression.
BACKGROUND:
We observed a disproportional 18 F-fluorothymidine (F-FLT) uptake in follicular lymphoma (FL) relative to its low cell proliferation. We tested the hypothesis that the 'excess' uptake of 18 F-FLT in FL is related to error-prone DNA repair and investigated whether this also contributes to 18 F-FLT uptake in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
METHODS:
We performed immunohistochemical stainings to assess the pure DNA replication marker MIB-1 as well as markers of both DNA replication and repair like PCNA, TK-1 and RPA1 on lymph node biopsies of 27 FLs and 35 DLBCLs. In 7 FL and 15 DLBCL patients, 18 F-FLT-PET had been performed.
RESULTS:
18 F-FLT uptake was lower in FL than in DLBCL (median SUVmax 5.7 vs. 8.9, p = 0,004), but the ratio of 18 F-FLT-SUVmax to percentage of MIB-1 positive cells was significantly higher in FL compared with DLBCL (p = 0.001). The median percentage of MIB-1 positive cells was 10% (range, 10% to 20%) in FL and 70% (40% to 80%) in DLBCL. In contrast, the median percentages of PCNA, TK-1 and RPA1 positive cells were 90% (range, 80 to 100), 90% (80 to 100) and 100% (80 to 100) in FL versus 90% (60 to 100), 90% (60 to 100) and 100% (80 to 100) in DLBCL, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
This is the first demonstration of a striking discordance between 18 F-FLT uptake in FL and tumour cell proliferation. High expression of DNA replication and repair markers compared with the pure proliferation marker MIB-1 in FL suggests that this discordance might be due to error-prone DNA repair. While DNA repair-related 18 F-FLT uptake considerably contributes to 18 F-FLT uptake in FL, its contribution to 18 F-FLT uptake in highly proliferative DLBCL is small. This apparently high contribution of DNA repair to the 18 F-FLT signal in FL may hamper studies where 18 F-FLT is used to assess response to cytostatic therapy or to distinguish between FL and transformed lymphoma.