Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (30)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (30)
Document Type
- Journal article (29)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- English (30)
Keywords
- positron emission tomography (7)
- CXCR4 (6)
- PRRT (5)
- multiple myeloma (5)
- PET (4)
- PET/CT (4)
- lymphoma (4)
- FDG (3)
- chemokine receptor (3)
- medicine (3)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin (29)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (8)
- Pathologisches Institut (6)
- Abteilung für Molekulare Innere Medizin (in der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik II) (2)
- Institut für Klinische Biochemie und Pathobiochemie (2)
- Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie (Institut für Röntgendiagnostik) (2)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (2)
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik (2)
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (1)
- Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung (1)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
EU-Project number / Contract (GA) number
- 701983 (2)
The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments.
For this purpose, the EANM proposes to distinguish three levels in compliance to the optimization principle in the directive, inspired by the indication of levels in prescribing, recording and reporting of absorbed doses after radiotherapy defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU):
Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 (“activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry”), which is defined by administering the activity within 10% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable.
Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 (“activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry”), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions.
The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 (“dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification”), whenever possible and relevant.
Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments.
Purpose
Adrenal tumors represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Promising results have been obtained through targeting the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 for molecular imaging, and [\(^{123/131}\)I]iodometomidate ([\(^{123/131}\)I]IMTO) has even been successfully introduced as a theranostic agent. As this radiopharmaceutical shows rapid metabolic inactivation, we aimed at developing new improved tracers.
Methods
Several IMTO derivatives were newly designed by replacing the unstable methyl ester by different carboxylic esters or amides. The inhibition of aldosterone and cortisol synthesis was tested in different adrenocortical cell lines. The corresponding radiolabeled compounds were assessed regarding their stability, in vitro cell uptake, in vivo biodistribution in mice, and their binding specificity to cryosections of human adrenocortical and non-adrenocortical tissue. Furthermore, a first investigation was performed in patients with known metastatic adrenal cancer using both [\(^{123}\)I]IMTO and the most promising compound (R)-1-[1-(4-[\(^{123/}\)I]iodophenyl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid azetidinylamide ([\(^{123}\)I]IMAZA) for scintigraphy. Subsequently, a first endoradiotherapy with [\(^{131}\)I]IMAZA in one of these patients was performed.
Results
We identified three analogues to IMTO with high-affinity binding to the target enzymes and comparable or higher metabolic stability and very high and specific accumulation in adrenocortical cells in vitro and in vivo. Labeled IMAZA exhibited superior pharmacokinetic and imaging properties compared to IMTO in mice and 3 patients, too. An endoradiotherapy with [\(^{131}\)I]IMAZA induced a 21-month progression-free interval in a patient with rapidly progressing ACC prior this therapy.
Conclusion
We developed the new radiopharmaceutical [\(^{123/131}\)I]IMAZA with superior properties compared to the reference compound IMTO and promising first experiences in humans.
Purpose
For somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), a standardized framework termed SSTR-reporting and data system (RADS) has been proposed. We aimed to elucidate the impact of a RADS-focused training on reader’s anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT, the motivational beliefs in learning such a system, whether it increases reader’s confidence, and its implementation in clinical routine.
Procedures
A 3-day training course focusing on SSTR-RADS was conducted. Self-report questionnaires were handed out prior to the course (Pre) and thereafter (Post). The impact of the training on the following categories was evaluated: (1) test anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT, (2) motivational beliefs, (3) increase in reader’s confidence, and (4) clinical implementation. To assess the effect size of the course, Cohen’s d was calculated (small, d = 0.20; large effect, d = 0.80).
Results
Of 22 participants, Pre and Post were returned by 21/22 (95.5%). In total, 14/21 (66.7%) were considered inexperienced (IR, < 1 year experience in reading SSTR-PET/CTs) and 7/21 (33.3%) as experienced readers (ER, > 1 year). Applying SSTR-RADS, a large decrease in anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT was noted for IR (d = − 0.74, P = 0.02), but not for ER (d = 0.11, P = 0.78). For the other three categories motivational beliefs, reader’s confidence, and clinical implementation, agreement rates were already high prior to the training and persisted throughout the course (P ≥ 0.21).
Conclusions
A framework-focused reader training can reduce anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CTs, in particular for inexperienced readers. This may allow for a more widespread adoption of this system, e.g., in multicenter trials for better intra- and interindividual comparison of scan results.