Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Document Type
- Journal article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3)
Keywords
- melanoma (2)
- ERK signaling (1)
- MAP-Kinase (1)
- Melanom (1)
- Melanoma (1)
- PI3K (1)
- RAS (1)
- Signalkette (1)
- chemotherapy resistance (1)
- crosstalk (1)
Institute
Background: Melanoma is an aggressive tumor with increasing incidence. To develop accurate prognostic markers and targeted therapies, changes leading to malignant transformation of melanocytes need to be understood. In the Xiphophorus melanoma model system, a mutated version of the EGF receptor Xmrk (Xiphophorus melanoma receptor kinase) triggers melanomagenesis. Cellular events downstream of Xmrk, such as the activation of Akt, Ras, B-Raf or Stat5, were also shown to play a role in human melanomagenesis. This makes the elucidation of Xmrk downstream targets a useful method for identifying processes involved in melanoma formation. Methods: Here, we analyzed Xmrk-induced gene expression using a microarray approach. Several highly expressed genes were confirmed by realtime PCR, and pathways responsible for their induction were revealed using small molecule inhibitors. The expression of these genes was also monitored in human melanoma cell lines, and the target gene FOSL1 was knocked down by siRNA. Proliferation and migration of siRNA-treated melanoma cell lines were then investigated. Results: Genes with the strongest upregulation after receptor activation were FOS-like antigen 1 (Fosl1), early growth response 1 (Egr1), osteopontin (Opn), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (Igfbp3), dual-specificity phosphatase 4 (Dusp4), and tumor-associated antigen L6 (Taal6). Interestingly, most genes were blocked in presence of a SRC kinase inhibitor. Importantly, we found that FOSL1, OPN, IGFBP3, DUSP4, and TAAL6 also exhibited increased expression levels in human melanoma cell lines compared to human melanocytes. Knockdown of FOSL1 in human melanoma cell lines reduced their proliferation and migration. Conclusion: Altogether, the data show that the receptor tyrosine kinase Xmrk is a useful tool in the identification of target genes that are commonly expressed in Xmrk-transgenic melanocytes and melanoma cell lines. The identified molecules constitute new possible molecular players in melanoma development. Specifically, a role of FOSL1 in melanomagenic processes is demonstrated. These data are the basis for future detailed analyses of the investigated target genes.
The mechanisms that enable cells to regulate their gene expression and thus their metabolism, proliferation or cellular behaviour are not only important to understand the basic biology of a living cell, but are also of crucial interest in cancerogenesis. Highly interwoven and tightly regulated pathways are the basis of a robust but also flexible regulatory network. Interference with these pathways can be either causative for tumorigenesis or can modify its outcome. The receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and RAS dependent pathways leading to AKT or ERK1/2 activation are of particular interest in melanoma. These signaling modules are commonly activated by different mutations that can be found in various pathway components like NRAS, BRAF or PTEN. The first part of this work deals with the diverse and versatile functions of the ERK1/2 pathway feedbackregulator MKP2 in different cellular, melanoma relevant settings. In addition, a functional role of the AP1-complex member FOSL1, an ERK1/2 transcriptional target being implicated in the regulation of proliferation, is demonstrated. Secondly, aspects of direct pharmacological inhibition of the ERK1/2 pathway with regard to the induction of apoptosis have been analysed. Due to the high frequency of melanoma related mutations occurring in the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway (e.g. NRASQ61K, BRAFV600E), inhibition of this signaling cascade is deemed to be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of malignant melanoma. However, although in clinical trials mono-therapeutic treatment with MEK- or RAF inhibitors was successful in the short run, it failed to show satisfactory long-lasting effects. Hence, combination therapies using a MAPK pathway inhibitor and an additional therapy are currently under investigation. I was able to demonstrate that inhibition of MEK using the highly specific inhibitor PD184352 can have a protective effect on melanoma cells with regard to their susceptibility towards the apoptosis inducing agent cisplatin. Single application of cisplatin led to strong DNA damage and the induction of caspase-dependent apoptosis. Additional administration of the MEK inhibitor, however, strongly reduced the apoptosis inducing effect of cisplatin in several melanoma cell lines, These cells displayed an increased activation of the serine/threonine kinase AKT after MEK inhibition. This AKT activation concomitantly led to the phosphorylation of FOXO transcription factors, attenuating the cisplatin induced expression of the BH3-only protein PUMA. PUMA in turn was important to mediate the apoptosis machinery after cisplatin treatment. My results also indicate a participation of RTKs, in particular EGFR, in mediating MEK inhibitor induced activation of AKT. These results demonstrate that inhibition of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway in melanoma cell lines does not necessilary have favourable effects in a cytotoxic co-treatment situation. Instead, it can even enhance melanoma survival under pro-apoptotic conditions.
Inhibition of RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is beneficial for many patients with BRAFV600E–mutated melanoma. However, primary and secondary resistances restrict long-lasting therapy success. Combination therapies are therefore urgently needed. Here, we evaluate the cellular effect of combining a MEK inhibitor with a genotoxic apoptosis inducer. Strikingly, we observed that an activated MAPK pathway promotes in several melanoma cell lines the pro-apoptotic response to genotoxic stress, and MEK inhibition reduces intrinsic apoptosis. This goes along with MEK inhibitor induced increased RAS and P-AKT levels. The protective effect of the MEK inhibitor depends on PI3K signaling, which prevents the induction of pro-apoptotic PUMA that mediates apoptosis after DNA damage. We could show that the MEK inhibitor dependent feedback loop is enabled by several factors, including EGF receptor and members of the SPRED family. The simultaneous knockdown of SPRED1 and SPRED2 mimicked the effects of MEK inhibitor such as PUMA repression and protection from apoptosis. Our data demonstrate that MEK inhibition of BRAFV600E-positive melanoma cells can protect from genotoxic stress, thereby achieving the opposite of the intended anti-tumorigenic effect of the combination of MEK inhibitor with inducers of intrinsic apoptosis.