Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Journal article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Keywords
- 2B (1)
- Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A (1)
- Deflazacort (1)
- Duchenne dystrphy (1)
- Limb girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) (1)
- Merkel cell density (1)
- Miyoshi myopathy (1)
- children (1)
- design (1)
- dysferlinopathy (1)
Institute
Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A, caused by a duplication of the gene peripheral myelin protein 22 kDa, is the most frequent subtype of hereditary peripheral neuropathy with an estimated prevalence of 1:5000. Patients suffer from sensory deficits, muscle weakness and foot deformities. There is no treatment approved for this disease. Outcome measures in clinical trials were based mainly on clinical features but did not evaluate the actual nerve damage. In our case–control study, we aimed to provide objective and reproducible outcome measures for future clinical trials. We collected skin samples from 48 patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A, 7 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, 16 patients with small fibre neuropathy and 45 healthy controls. To analyse skin innervation, 40-µm cryosections of glabrous skin taken from the lateral index finger were double-labelled by immunofluorescence. The disease severity of patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A was assessed by the Charcot–Marie–Tooth neuropathy version 2 score, which ranged from 3 (mild) to 27 (severe) and correlated with age (P < 0.01, R = 0.4). Intraepidermal nerve fibre density was reduced in patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A compared with the healthy control group (P < 0.01) and negatively correlated with disease severity (P < 0.05, R = −0.293). Meissner corpuscle (MC) density correlated negatively with age in patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A (P < 0.01, R = −0.45) but not in healthy controls (P = 0.07, R = 0.28). The density of Merkel cells was reduced in patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A compared with healthy controls (P < 0.05). Furthermore, in patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A, the fraction of denervated Merkel cells was highly increased and correlated with age (P < 0.05, R = 0.37). Analysis of nodes of Ranvier revealed shortened paranodes and a reduced fraction of long nodes in patients compared with healthy controls (both P < 0.001). Langerhans cell density was increased in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, but not different in Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A compared with healthy controls. Our data suggest that intraepidermal nerve fibre density might be used as an outcome measure in Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A disease, as it correlates with disease severity. The densities of Meissner corpuscles and Merkel cells might be an additional tool for the evaluation of the disease progression. Analysis of follow-up biopsies will clarify the effects of Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A disease progression on cutaneous innervation.
Treatment of dysferlinopathy with deflazacort: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
(2013)
Background: Dysferlinopathies are autosomal recessive disorders caused by mutations in the dysferlin (DYSF) gene encoding the dysferlin protein. DYSF mutations lead to a wide range of muscular phenotypes, with the most prominent being Miyoshi myopathy (MM) and limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B (LGMD2B).
Methods: We assessed the one-year-natural course of dysferlinopathy, and the safety and efficacy of deflazacort treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. After one year of natural course without intervention, 25 patients with genetically defined dysferlinopathy were randomized to receive deflazacort and placebo for six months each (1 mg/kg/day in month one, 1 mg/kg every 2nd day during months two to six) in one of two treatment sequences. Results: During one year of natural course, muscle strength declined about 2% as measured by CIDD (Clinical Investigation of Duchenne Dystrophy) score, and 76 Newton as measured by hand-held dynamometry. Deflazacort did not improve muscle strength. In contrast, there is a trend of worsening muscle strength under deflazacort treatment, which recovers after discontinuation of the study drug. During deflazacort treatment, patients showed a broad spectrum of steroid side effects.
Conclusion: Deflazacort is not an effective therapy for dysferlinopathies, and off-label use is not warranted. This is an important finding, since steroid treatment should not be administered in patients with dysferlinopathy, who may be often misdiagnosed as polymyositis.