Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Keywords
- Cataglyphis (1)
- Geomagnetic Field (1)
- Insekten (1)
- Kompass (1)
- Learning & Memory (1)
- Learning Walk (1)
- Monarchfalter (1)
- Nahrungserwerb (1)
- Navigation (1)
- Neuroethologie (1)
Institute
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (2) (remove)
Humans and animals alike use the sun, the moon, and the stars to guide their ways.
However, the position of celestial cues changes depending on daytime, season, and
place on earth. To use these celestial cues for reliable navigation, the rotation of the
sky has to be compensated. While humans invented complicated mechanisms like the
Antikythera mechanism to keep track of celestial movements, animals can only rely on
their brains. The desert ant Cataglyphis is a prime example of an animal using celestial
cues for navigation. Using the sun and the related skylight polarization pattern as a
compass, and a step integrator for distance measurements, it can determine a vector
always pointing homewards. This mechanism is called path integration. Since the sun’s
position and, therefore, also the polarization pattern changes throughout the day,
Cataglyphis have to correct this movement. If they did not compensate for time, the
ants’ compass would direct them in different directions in the morning and the evening.
Thus, the ants have to learn the solar ephemeris before their far-reaching foraging
trips.
To do so, Cataglyphis ants perform a well-structured learning-walk behavior during the
transition phase from indoor worker to outdoor forager. While walking in small loops
around the nest entrance, the ants repeatedly stop their forward movements to perform
turns. These can be small walked circles (voltes) or tight turns about the ants’ body
axes (pirouettes). During pirouettes, the ants gaze back to their nest entrance during
stopping phases. These look backs provide a behavioral read-out for the state of the
path integrator. The ants “tell” the observer where they think their nest is, by looking
back to it. Pirouettes are only performed by Cataglyphis ants inhabiting an environment
with a prominent visual panorama. This indicates, that pirouettes are performed to
learn the visual panorama. Voltes, on the other hand, might be used for calibrating the
celestial compass of the ants.
In my doctoral thesis, I employed a wide range of state-of-the-art techniques from
different disciplines in biology to gain a deeper understanding of how navigational
information is acquired, memorized, used, and calibrated during the transition phase
from interior worker to outdoor forager. I could show, that celestial orientation cues that
provide the main compass during foraging, do not guide the ants during the look-backbehavior
of initial learning walks. Instead Cataglyphis nodus relies on the earth’s
magnetic field as a compass during this early learning phase. While not guiding the
ants during their first walks outside of the nest, excluding the ants from perceiving the
natural polarization pattern of the skylight has significant consequences on learning-related
plasticity in the ants’ brain. Only if the ants are able to perform their learning-walk
behavior under a skylight polarization pattern that changes throughout the day,
plastic neuronal changes in high-order integration centers are induced. Especially the
mushroom bogy collar, a center for learning and memory, and the central complex, a
center for orientation and motor control, showed an increase in volume after learning
walks. This underlines the importance of learning walks for calibrating the celestial
compass. The magnetic compass might provide the necessary stable reference
system for the ants to calibrate their celestial compass and learn the position of
landmark information. In the ant brain, visual information from the polarization-sensitive
ocelli converge in tight apposition with neuronal afferents of the mechanosensitive
Johnston’s organ in the ant’s antennae. This makes the ants’ antennae an interesting
candidate for studying the sensory bases of compass calibration in Cataglyphis ants.
The brain of the desert navigators is well adapted to successfully accomplish their
navigational needs. Females (gynes and workers) have voluminous mushroom bodies,
and the synaptic complexity to store large amount of view-based navigational
information, which they acquire during initial learning walks. The male Cataglyphis
brain is better suited for innate behaviors that support finding a mate.
The results of my thesis show that the well adapted brain of C. nodus ants undergoes
massive structural changes during leaning walks, dependent on a changing celestial
polarization pattern. This underlies the essential role of learning walks in the calibration
of orientation systems in desert ants.
The monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) performs one of the most astonishing behaviors in the animal kingdom: every fall millions of these butterflies leave their breeding grounds in North Amerika and migrate more than 4.000 km southwards until they reach their overwintering habitat in Central Mexico. To maintain their migratory direction over this enormous distance, the butterflies use a time-compensated sun compass. Beside this, skylight polarization, the Earth’s magnetic field and specific mountain ranges seem to guide the butterflies as well the south. In contrast to this fascinating orientation ability, the behavior of the butterflies in their non-migratory state received less attention. Although they do not travel long distances, they still need to orient themselves to find food, mating partners or get away from competitors. The aim of the present doctoral thesis was to investigate use of visual cues for orientation in migrating as well as non-migrating monarch butterflies. For this, field experiments investigating the migration of the butterflies in Texas (USA) were combined with experiments testing the orientation performance of non-migratory butterflies in Germany.
In the first project, I recorded the heading directions of tethered butterflies during their annual fall migration. In an outdoor flight simulator, the butterflies maintained a southwards direction as long as they had a view of the sun’s position. Relocating the position of the sun by 180° using a mirror, revealed that the sun is the animals’ main orientation reference. Furthermore, I demonstrated that when the sun is blocked and a green light stimulus (simulated sun) is introduced, the animals interpreted this stimulus as the ‘real’ sun. However, this cue was not sufficient to set the migratory direction when simulated as the only visual cue in indoor experiments. When I presented the butterflies a linear polarization pattern additionally to the simulated sun, the animals headed in the correct southerly direction showing that multiple skylight cues are required to guide the butterflies during their migration.
In the second project, I, furthermore, demonstrated that non-migrating butterflies are able to maintain a constant direction with respect to a simulated sun. Interestingly, they ignored the spectral component of the stimulus and relied on the intensity instead. When a panoramic skyline was presented as the only orientation reference, the butterflies maintained their direction only for short time windows probably trying to stabilize their flight based on optic-flow information. Next, I investigated whether the butterflies combine celestial with local cues by simulating a sun stimulus together with a panoramic skyline. Under this conditions, the animals’ directedness was increased demonstrating that they combine multiple visual cues for spatial orientation.
Following up on the observation that a sun stimulus resulted in a different behavior than the panoramic skyline, I investigated in my third project which orientation strategies the butterflies use by presenting different simulated cues to them. While a bright stripe on a dark background elicited a strong attraction of the butterflies steering in the direction of the stimulus, the inverted version of the stimulus was used for flight stabilization. In contrast to this, the butterflies maintained arbitrary directions with a high directedness with respect to a simulated sun. In an ambiguous scenery with two identical stimuli (two bright stripes, two dark stripes, or two sun stimuli) set 180° apart, a constant flight course was only achieved when two sun stimuli were displayed suggesting an involvement of the animals’ internal compass. In contrast, the butterflies used two dark stripes for flight stabilization and were alternatingly attracted by two bright stripes. This shows that monarch butterflies use stimulus-dependent orientation strategies and gives the first evidence for different neuronal pathways controlling the output behavior.