Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Keywords
- BMP signaling (1)
- Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (1)
- FGF signaling (1)
- Molekularbiologie (1)
- bone regeneration (1)
- ectopic bone formation (1)
- in vivo study (1)
- site directed immobilization (1)
Institute
- Lehrstuhl für Tissue Engineering und Regenerative Medizin (2) (remove)
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are involved in various aspects of cell-cell communication in complex life forms. They act as morphogens, help differentiate different cell types from different progenitor cells in development, and are involved in many instances of intercellular communication, from forming a body axis to healing bone fractures, from sugar metabolism to angiogenesis. If the same protein or protein family carries out many functions, there is a demand to regulate and fine-tune their biological activities, and BMPs are highly regulated to generate cell- and context-dependent outcomes.
Not all such instances can be explained yet. Growth/differentiation factor (GDF)5 (or BMP14) synergizes with BMP2 on chondrogenic ATDC5 cells, but antagonizes BMP2 on myoblastic C2C12 cells. Known regulators of BMP2/GDF5 signal transduction failed to explain this context-dependent difference, so a microarray was performed to identify new, cell-specific regulatory components. One identified candidate, the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2, was analyzed as a potential new co-receptor to BMP ligands such as GDF5: It was shown that FGFR2 directly binds BMP2, GDF5, and other BMP ligands in vitro, and FGFR2 was able to positively influence BMP2/GDF5-mediated signaling outcome in cell-based assays. This effect was independent of FGFR2s kinase activity, and independent of the downstream mediators SMAD1/5/8, p42/p44, Akt, and p38. The elevated colocalization of BMP receptor type IA and FGFR2 in the presence of BMP2 or GDF5 suggests a signaling complex containing both receptors, akin to other known co-receptors of BMP ligands such as repulsive guidance molecules.
This unexpected direct interaction between FGF receptor and BMP ligands potentially opens a new category of BMP signal transduction regulation, as FGFR2 is the second receptor tyrosine kinase to be identified as BMP co-receptor, and more may follow. The integration of cell surface interactions between members of the FGF and BMP family especially may widen the knowledge of such cellular communication mechanisms which involve both growth factor families, including morphogen gradients and osteogenesis, and may in consequence help to improve treatment options in osteochodnral diseases.
Induction of ectopic bone formation by site directed immobilized BMP2 variants \(in\) \(vivo\)
(2020)
In contrast to common bone fractures, critical size bone defects are unable to self-regenerate and therefore external sources for bone replacement are needed. Currently, the gold standard to treat critical size bone fractures, resulting from diseases, trauma or surgical interventions, is the use of autologous bone transplantation that is associated with several drawbacks such as postoperative pain, increased loss of blood during surgery and extended operative time.
The field of bone tissue engineering focuses on the combination of biomaterials and growth factors to circumvent these adverse events and thereby to improve critical size bone defects treatment.
To this aim, a promising approach is represented by using a collagen sponge soaked with one of the most powerful osteoinductive proteins, the bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2). After the approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), BMP2 was used to successfully treat several severe bone defects. However, the use of BMP2 delivery systems is associated with severe side effects such as inflammation, swelling, ectopic bone formation outside of the site of implantation and breathing problems if implanted in the area of the cervical spine. The occurrence of severe side effects is related to the supraphysiological amounts of the applied protein at the implantation site. The BMP2 is typically adsorbed into the scaffold and diffuses rapidly after implantation. Therefore, intensive research has been conducted to improve the protein’s retention ability, since a prolonged entrapment of the BMP2 at the implantation site would induce superior bone formation in vivo due to a minimized protein release. By controlling the release from newly designed materials or changing the protein immobilization methods, it seems possible to improve the osteoinductive properties of the resulting BMP2-functionalized scaffolds.
The combination of biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds functionalized with a covalently immobilized protein such as BMP2 would constitute a new alternative in bone tissue engineering by eliminating the aforementioned severe side effects. One of the most common immobilization techniques is represented by the so-called EDC/NHS chemistry. This coupling technique allows covalent biding of the growth factor but in a non-site direct manner, thus producing an implant with uncontrollable and unpredictable osteogenic activities. Therefore, the generation of BMP2 variants harboring functional groups that allow a site-directed immobilization to the scaffold, would enable the production of implants with reproducible osteogenic activity.
The new BMP2 variants harbor an artificial amino acid at a specific position of the mature polypeptide sequence. The presence of the unnatural amino acid allows to use particular covalent immobilization techniques in a highly specific and site directed manner. The two selected BMP2 variants, BMP2 E83Plk and BMP2 E83Azide, were expressed in E. coli, renatured and purified by cation exchange chromatography. The final products were intensively analyzed in terms of purity and biological activity in vitro. The two BMP2 variants enabled the application of different coupling techniques and verify the possible options for site directed immobilization to the scaffold.
Intensive analyses on the possible side effects caused by the coupling reactions and on the quantification of the coupled protein were performed. Both click chemistry reactions showed high reaction efficacies when the BMP2 variants were coupled to functionalized fluorophores. Quantification by ELISA and scintillation counting of radioactively labeled protein revealed different outcomes. Moreover, the amounts of protein detected for the BMP2 variants coupled to microspheres were similar to that of the wild type protein. Therefore, it was not possible to conclude whether the BMP2 variants were covalently coupled or just adsorbed.
BMP2 variants being immobilized to various microspheres induced osteogenic differentiation of C2C12 cells in vitro, but only in those cells that were located in close proximity to the functionalized beads. This selectivity strongly indicates that the protein is for a great portion covalently coupled and not just adsorbed. Moreover, the difference between the covalently coupled BMP2 variants and the adsorbed BMP2 WT was confirmed in vivo. Injection of the BMP2-functionalized microspheres in a rat model induced subcutaneous bone formation.
The main aim of the animal experiment was to prove whether covalently coupled BMP2 induces bone formation at significant lower doses if compared to the amount being required if the protein is simply adsorbed. To this aim, several BMP2 concentrations were tested in this animal experiment. The BMP2 variants, being covalently immobilized, were hypothesized to be retained and therefore bio-available at the site of implantation for a prolonged time. However, in the animal experiments, lower doses of either coupled or adsorbed protein were unable to induce any bone formation within the 12 weeks.
In contrast, the highest doses induced bone formation that was first detected at week 4. During the 12 weeks of the experiment, an increase in bone density and a steady state bone volume was observed. These results were obtained only for the covalently coupled BMP2 E83Azide but not for BMP2 E83Plk that did not induce bone formation in any condition. The negative outcome after application of BMP2 E83Plk suggested that the coupling reaction might have provoked changes in the protein structure that extremely influenced its osteogenic capabilities in vivo.
However, the histological examination of the different ossicles induced either by BMP2 WT or BMP2 E83Azide, revealed clear morphological differences. BMP2 WT induced a bone shell-like structure, while the covalently coupled protein induced uniform bone formation also throughout the inner part. The differences between the two newly formed bones can be clearly associated with the different protein delivery mechanisms. Thus, the developed functionalized microspheres constitute a new interesting strategy that needs further investigations in order to be able to be used as replacement of the currently used BMP2 WT loaded medical devices.