Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (19)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (19)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (19)
Language
- English (19)
Keywords
- miRNS (5)
- SMN (3)
- Biogenese (2)
- Multiproteinkomplex (2)
- Myc (2)
- RNS (2)
- Transcription (2)
- microRNA (2)
- snRNP (2)
- 5' UTR (1)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (19) (remove)
For the differentiation of a embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to neuronal cells (NCs) a complex and coordinated gene regulation program is needed. One important control element for neuronal differentiation is the repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor (REST) complex, which represses neuronal gene expression in non-neuronal cells. Crucial effector proteins of the REST complex are small phosphatases such as the CTDSPs (C-terminal domain small phosphatases) that regulate polymerase II activity by dephosphorylating the C-terminal domain of the polymerase, thereby repressing target genes. The stepwise inactivation of REST, including the CTDSPs, leads to the induction of a neuron-specific gene program, which ultimately induces the formation of neurons. The spatio-temporal control of REST and its effector components is therefore a crucial step for neurogenesis.
In zebrafish it was shown that the REST-associated CTDSP2 is negatively regulated by the micro RNA (miR) -26b. Interestingly, the miR-26b is encoded in an intron of the primary transcript of CTDSP2. This gives the fundament of an intrinsic regulatory negative feedback loop, which is essential for the proceeding of neurogenesis. This feedback loop is active during neurogenesis, but inactive in non-neuronal cells. The reason for this is that the maturation of the precursor miR (pre-miR) to the mature miR-26 is arrested in non neuronal cells, but not in neurons. As only mature miRs are actively repressing genes, the regulation of miR-26 processing is an essential step in neurogenesis.
In this study, the molecular basis of miR-26 processing regulation in the context of neurogenesis was addressed. The mature miR is processed from two larger precursors: First the primary transcript is cleaved by the enzyme DROSHA in the nucleus to form the pre-miR. The pre-miR is exported from the nucleus and processed further through the enzyme DICER to yield the mature miR. The mature miR can regulate gene expression in association with the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC).
Multiple different scenarios in which miR processing was regulated were proposed and experimentally tested. Microinjection studies using Xenopus leavis oocytes showed that slowdown or blockage of the nucleo-cytoplasmic transport are not the reason for delayed pre-miR-26 processing. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo miR-processing assays showed that maturation is most likely regulated through a in trans acting factor, which blocks processing in non neuronal cells.
Through RNA affinity chromatographic assays using zebrafish and murine lysates I was able to isolate and identify proteins that interact specifically with pre-miR-26 and could by this influence its biogenesis. Potential candidates are FMRP/FXR1/2, ZNF346 and Eral1, whose functional characterisation in the context of miR-biogenesis could now be addressed.
The second part of my thesis was executed in close colaboration with the laboratory of Prof. Albrecht Müller. The principal question was addressed how miR-26 influences neuronal gene expression and which genes are primarily affected. This research question could be addressed by using a cell culture model system, which mimics ex vivo the differentiation of ESCs to NCs via neuronal progenitor.
For the functional analysis of miR-26 knock out cell lines were generated by the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. miR-26 deficient ESC keep their pluripotent state and are able to develop NPC, but show major impairment in differentiating to NCs. Through RNA deep sequencing the miR-26 induced transcriptome differences could be analysed.
On the level of mRNAs it could be shown, that the expression of neuronal gene is downregulated in miR-26 deficient NCs. Interestingly, the deletion of miR-26 leads to selectively decreased levels of miRs, which on one hand regulate the REST complex and on the other hand are under transcriptional control by REST themself. This data and the discovery that induction of miR-26 leads to enrichment of other REST regulating miRs indicates that miR-26 initiates neurogenesis through stepwise inactivation of the REST complex.
The genetic information encoded with in the genes are transcribed and translated to give rise to
the functional proteins, which are building block of a cell. At first, it was thought that the
regulation of gene expression particularly occurs at the level of transcription by various
transcription factors. Recent discoveries have shown the vital role of gene regulation at the level
of RNA also known as post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR). Apart from non-coding RNAs
e.g. micro RNAs, various RNA binding proteins (RBPs) play essential role in PTGR. RBPs have
been implicated in different stages of mRNA life cycle ranging from splicing, processing,
transport, localization and decay. In last 20 years studies have shown the presence of hundreds
of RBPs across eukaryotic systems many of which are widely conserved. Given the rising number
of RBPs and their link to human diseases it is quite evident that RBPs have major role in cellular
processes and their regulation. The current study is aimed to describe the so far unknown
molecular mechanism of CCHC-type Zinc Finger Nucleic Acid Binding Protein (CNBP/ZNF9)
function in vivo.
CNBP is ubiquitously expressed across various human tissues and is a highly conserved RBP in
eukaryotes. It is required for embryonic development in mammals and has been implicated in
transcriptional as well as post-transcriptional gene regulation; however, its molecular function
and direct target genes remain elusive. Here, we use multiple systems-wide approaches to
identify CNBP targets and document the consequences of CNBP binding. We established CNBP as
a cytoplasmic RNA-binding-protein and used Photoactivatable Ribonucleoside Enhanced
Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation (PAR-CLIP) to identify direct interactions of CNBP with
4178 mRNAs. CNBP preferentially bound a G-rich motif in the target mRNA coding sequences.
Functional analyses, including ribosome profiling, RNA sequencing, and luciferase assays
revealed the CNBP mode of action on target transcripts. CNBP binding was found to increase the
translational efficiency of its target genes. We hypothesize that this is consistent with an RNA
chaperone function of CNBP helping to resolve secondary structures, thus promoting
translation. Altogether this study provides a novel mechanism of CNBP function in vivo and acts
as a step-stone to study the individual CNBP targets that will bring us closer to understand the
disease onset.
Spliceosomal U-rich small ribonucleoprotein particles (U snRNPs) are the major building
blocks of the nuclear pre-mRNA splicing machinery. The core composition of U snRNPs
includes the name giving U snRNA and a set of seven common (Sm) proteins termed Sm
B/B’, D1, D2, D3, E, F and G. These Sm proteins are arranged in the form of a toroidal ring on
the single stranded conserved sequence element in the snRNA to form the Sm core domain.
Even though U snRNPs assemble spontaneously in vitro, their assembly in vivo requires an
amazingly large number of trans-acting assembly factors united in the Protein Arginine
Methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and the Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) complexes. The
cytoplasmic assembly pathway of U snRNPs can be divided into the early and the late phase.
The early phase is dominated by the assembly chaperone, pICln, a subunit of the PRMT5
complex. This factor binds to Sm proteins and delivers them in a pICln-bound form to the
PRMT5 complex. The early assembly phase then segregates into two lines. In one assembly
line, a stable hexameric ring intermediate (6S complex) composed of pICln and the five Sm
proteins D1, D2, F, E and G, is formed. This intermediate forms at the PRMT5 complex but
dissociates from the latter upon completion of its assembly. Within the 6S complex, these Sm
proteins are pre-organized into respective spatial positions adopted in the assembled U
snRNP. The other assembly line forms a protein trimer composed of pICln, Sm B/B’ and D3,
which unlike the 6S complex is not released from the PRMT5 complex. As a consequence of
their association with pICln, Sm proteins are kinetically trapped and fail to proceed in the
assembly pathway. The late phase of the U snRNP formation is dominated by the SMN
complex, which resolves this kinetic trap by dissociating pICln from the pre-organized Sm
proteins and, subsequently catalyzes the loading of the Sm proteins on the U snRNA.
Even though basic principles of U snRNP assembly have been understood in some detail, the
question arises as to why cells employ sophisticated assembly machinery for the assembly
despite the reaction occurring spontaneously in vitro. A few studies have shown that the
system works towards rendering specificity to the assembly reaction. However, Sm proteins
in their free form expose hydrophobic surfaces to the cytosolic solvent. Hence, I reasoned that
the assembly machinery of snRNPs might also prevent Sm protein aggregation.
In this thesis, I describe the work that leads to the discovery of a multi-layered regulatory
network for Sm proteins involving post-transcriptional and post-translational surveillance
mechanisms. Here, I show that the reduced level of SMN (a key assembly factor of the late
phase) leads to the initial tailback of Sm proteins over pICln followed by the transcriptional
down regulation of Sm protein encoding mRNAs. In contrast, depletion of pICln, a key factor
of the early phase, results in the retention of Sm proteins on the ribosomes followed by their
degradation via autophagy. Furthermore, I show that exceeding levels of Sm proteins over
pICln caused by overexpression results in aggregation and mis-localization of Sm proteins.
Thus, my findings uncover a complex regulatory network that helps to maintain the cellular
U snRNP homeostasis by either preventing or clearing the unassembled Sm protein
aggregates when they are not faithfully incorporated into the U snRNPs.
microRNAs in chronic pain
(2016)
Chronic pain is a common problem in clinical practice, not well understood clinically, and frequently tough to satisfactorily diagnose. Because the pathophysiology is so complex, finding effective treatments for people with chronic pain has been overall less than successful and typically reduced to an unsatisfactory trial-and-error process, all of which translates into a significant burden to society. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the development of chronic pain, and moreover why some patients experience pain and others not, may aid in developing specific treatment regimens. Although nerve injuries are major contributors to pain chronification, they cannot explain the entire phenomenon. Considerable research has underscored the importance of the immune system for the development and maintenance of chronic pain, albeit the exact factors regulating inflammatory reactions remain unclear. Understanding the putative molecular and cellular regulator switches of inflammatory reactions will open novel opportunities for immune modulatory analgesics with putatively higher specificity and less adverse effects. It has become clear that small, non- coding RNA molecules known as microRNAs are in fact potent regulators of many thousands of genes and possibly cross-communicate between cellular pathways in multiple systems acting as so-called “master-switches”. Aberrant expression of miRNAs is now implicated in numerous disorders, including nerve injuries as well as in inflammatory processes. Moreover, compelling evidence supports the idea that miRNAs also regulate pain, and in analogy to the oncology field aid in the differential diagnosis of disease subtypes. In fact, first reports describing characteristic miRNA expression profiles in blood or cerebrospinal fluid of patients with distinct pain conditions are starting to emerge, however evidence linking specific miRNA expression profiles to specific pain disorders is still insufficient. The present thesis aimed at first, identifying specific miRNA signatures in two distinct chronic pain conditions, namely peripheral neuropathies of different etiologies and fibromyalgia syndrome. Second, it aimed at identifying miRNA profiles to better understand potential factors that differentiate painful from painless neuropathies and third, study the mechanistic role of miRNAs in the pathophysiology of pain, to pave the way for new druggable targets.
Three studies were conducted in order to identify miRNA expression signatures that are characteristic for the given chronic pain disorder. The first study measured expression of miR-21, miR-146a and miR-155 in white blood cells, skin and nerve biopsies of patients with peripheral neuropathies. It shows that peripheral neuropathies of different etiologies are associated with increased peripheral miR-21 and miR-146a, but decreased miR-155 expression. More importantly, it was shown that painful neuropathies have increased sural nerve miR-21 and miR-155 expression, but reduced miR-146a and miR-155 expression in distal skin of painful neuropathies. These results point towards the potential use of miRNAs profiles to stratify painful neuropathies. The seconds study extends these findings and first analyzed the role of miR-132-3p in patients and subsequently in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Interestingly, miR-132-3p was upregulated in white blood cells and sural nerve biopsies of patients with painful neuropathies and in animals after spared nerve injury. Pharmacologically modulating the expression of miR-132-3p dose-dependently reversed pain behavior and pain aversion, indicating the pro-nociceptive effect of miR-132-3p in chronic pain. This study thus demonstrates the potential analgesic impact by modulating miRNA expression. Fibromyalgia is associated with chronic widespread pain and, at least in a subgroup, impairment in small nerve fiber morphology and function. Interestingly, the disease probably comprises subgroups with different underlying pathomechanisms. In accordance with this notion, the third study shows that fibromyalgia is associated with both aberrant white blood cell and cutaneous miRNA expression. Being the first of its kind, this study identified miR-let-7d and its downstream target IGF-1R as potential culprit for impaired small nerve fiber homeostasis in a subset of patients with decreased intra-epidermal nerve fiber density. The work presented in this thesis is a substantial contribution towards the goal of better characterizing chronic pain based on miRNA expression signatures and thus pave the way for new druggable targets.
While TGF-β is able to regulate miRNA expression in numerous cell types, TGF-β-dependent changes in the miRNA profile of CD8+ T cells had not been studied before. Considering that TGF-β suppresses CD8+ T cell effector functions in numerous ways, we wondered whether induction of immune-regulatory miRNAs could add to the known transcriptional effects of TGF-β on immune effector molecules. In this study, we used miRNA arrays, deep sequencing and qRT-PCR to identify miRNAs that are modulated by TGF-β in human CD8+ T cells. Having found that the TGF-β-dependent downregulation of NKG2D surface expression in NK cells and CD8+ T cells does not go along with a corresponding reduction in mRNA levels, this pathway appeared to be a possible target of TGF-β-inducible miRNAs. However, this hypothesis could not be confirmed by miRNA reporter assays. Instead, we observed that DAP10 transcription is suppressed by TGF-β which in turn negatively affects NKG2D surface expression. In spite of promising preliminary experiments, technical difficulties associated with the transfection of primary NK cells and NK cell lines unfortunately precluded the final proof of this hypothesis.
Instead, we focused on the TGF-β-induced changes in the miRNome of CD8+ T cells and confirmed the induction of the miR-23a cluster members, namely miR-23a, miR-27a and miR-24 by three different techniques. Searching for potential targets of these miRNAs which could contribute to the immunosuppressive action of TGF-β in T cells, we identified and confirmed a previously unknown regulation of IFN-γ mRNA by miR-27a and miR-24. Newly generated miRNA reporter constructs further revealed that LAMP1 mRNA is a target of miR-23a. Upon modulation of the miR-23a cluster in CD8+ T cells by the respective miRNA antagomirs and mimics, significant changes in IFN-γ expression confirmed the functional relevance of our findings. Effects on CD107a/LAMP1 expression were, in contrast, rather minimal. Still, overexpression of the miR-23a cluster attenuated the cytotoxic activity of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Taken together, these functional data reveal that the miR-23a cluster not only is induced by TGF-β, but also exerts a suppressive effect on CD8+ T-cell effector functions, even in the absence of TGF-β signaling.
MicroRNAs are endogenous ≈22 nt long non coding RNA molecules that modulate gene expression
at the post transcriptional level by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression.
MicroRNA-mRNA interaction involves a contiguous and perfect pairing within complementary
sites usually in the 3’ UTR of the target mRNA. Heart failure is associated with myocyte
hypertrophy and death, due to compensatory pathological remodeling and minimal functional repair
along with microRNA deregulation.
In this study, we identified candidate microRNAs based on their expression strength in
cardiomyocytes and by their ability to regulate hypertrophy. Expression profiling from early and
late stages of heart failure showed several deregulated microRNAs. Of these microRNAs, miR-378
emerged as a potentially interesting microRNA that was highly expressed in the mouse heart and
downregulated in the failing heart. Antihypertrophic activity of miR-378 was first observed by
screening a synthetic miR library for morphologic effects on cardiomyocytes, and validated in vitro proving the tight control of hypertrophy by this miR. We combined bioinformatic target prediction analysis and microarray analysis to identify the targets of miR-378. These analyses suggested that factors of the MAP kinase pathway were enriched among miR-378 targets, namely MAPK1 itself (also termed ERK2), the insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R), growth factor receptor bound protein 2 (GRB2) and kinase suppressor of ras 1 (KSR1). Regulation of these targets by miR-378 was then confirmed by mRNA and protein expression analysis. The use of luciferase reporter constructs with natural or mutated miR-378 binding sites further validated these four proteins as direct targets of miR-378. RNA interference with MAPK1 and the other three targets prevented the prohypertrophic effect of antimiR-378, suggesting that they functionally relate to miR-378. In vivo restoration of disease induced loss of miR-378 in a pressure overload mouse model of hypertrophy using adeno associated virus resulted in partial attenuation cardiac hypertrophy and significant improvement in cardiac function along with reduced expression of the four targets in heart.
We conclude from these findings that miR-378 is an antihypertrophic microRNA in cardiomyocytes, and the main mechanism underlying this effect is the suppression of the MAP kinase-signaling pathway on four distinct levels. Restoration of disease-associated loss of miR-378 through cardiomyocyte-targeted AAV-miR-378 may prove as an effective therapeutic strategy in myocardial disease.
An essential step in eukaryotic gene expression is splicing, i.e. the excision of non-coding sequences from pre-mRNA and the ligation of coding-sequences. This reaction is carried out by the spliceosome, which is a macromolecular machine composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) and a large number of proteins. Spliceosomal snRNPs are composed of one snRNA (or two in case of U4/6 snRNPs), seven common Sm proteins (SmD1, D2, D3, B, E, F, G) and several particle-specific proteins. The seven Sm proteins form a ring shaped structure on the snRNA, termed Sm core domain that forms a structural framework of all spliceosomal snRNPs. In the toroidal Sm core domain, the individual Sm proteins are arranged in the sequence SmE-SmG-SmD3-SmB- SmD1-SmD2-SmF from the first to the seventh nucleotide of the Sm site, respectively. The individual positions of Sm proteins in the Sm core domain are not interchangeable.
snRNPs are formed in vivo in a step-wise process, which starts with the export of newly transcribed snRNA to the cytoplasm. Within this compartment, Sm proteins are synthesized and subsequently transferred onto the snRNA. Upon formation of the Sm core and further modifications of snRNA, the snRNP is imported into the nucleus to join the spliceosome.
Prior to assembly into snRNPs, Sm proteins exist as specific hetero-oligomers in the cytoplasm. The association of these proteins with snRNA occurs spontaneously in vitro but requires the assistance of two major units, PRMT5- and SMN- complexes, in vivo. The early phase of assembly is critically influenced by the assembly chaperone pICln. This protein pre-organizes Sm proteins to functional building blocks and enables their recruitment onto the PRMT5 complex for methylation. Sm proteins are subsequently released from the PRMT5 complex as pICln bound entities and transferred onto the SMN-complex. The SMN complex then liberates the Sm proteins from the pICln-induced kinetic trap and allows their transfer onto the snRNA. Although the principal roles of SMN- and PRMT5 complexes in the assembly of snRNPs have been established, it is still not clear how newly translated Sm proteins are guided into the assembly line.
In this thesis, I have uncovered a new facet of pICln function in the assembly of snRNPs. I have shown that newly synthesized Sm proteins are retained at the ribosome upon termination of translation. Their release is facilitated by pICln, which interacts with the cognate Sm protein hetero-oligomers at their site of synthesis on the ribosome and recruits them into the assembly pathway. Additionally, I have been able to show that the early engagement of pICln with the Sm proteins ensures the flawless oligomerization of Sm proteins and prevents any non-chaperoned release and diffusion of Sm proteins in the cytoplasm.
In a second project, I have studied the mechanism of U7 snRNP assembly. This particle is a major component of the 3’ end processing machinery of replication dependent histone mRNAs. A biochemical hallmark of U7 is its unique Sm core in which the two canonical Sm proteins D1 and D2 are replaced by so-called “like Sm proteins”. The key question I addressed in my thesis was, how this “alternative” Sm core is assembled onto U7 snRNA. I have provided experimental evidence that the assembly route of U7 snRNPs and spliceosomal snRNPs are remarkably similar: The assembly of both particles depends on the same assembly factors and the mechanistic details are similar. It appears that formation of the U7- or spliceosomal- core specific 6S complex is the decisive step in assembly.
RNA helicases are key players in the regulation of gene expression. They act by remodeling local RNA secondary structures as well as RNA-protein interactions to enable the dynamic association of RNA binding proteins to their targets. The putative RNA helicase DHX30 is a member of the family of DEAH-box helicases with a putative role in the ATP-dependent unwinding of RNA secondary structures. Mutations in the DHX30 gene causes the autosomal dominant neuronal disease “Neurodevelopmental Disorder with severe Motor Impairment and Absent Language” (NEDMIAL;OMIM#617804). In this thesis, a strategy was established that enabled the large-scale purification of enzymatically active DHX30. Through enzymatic studies performed in vitro, DHX30 was shown to act as an ATP-dependent 3’ → 5’ RNA helicase that catalyzes the unwinding of RNA:RNA and RNA:DNA substrates. Using recombinant DHX30, it could be shown that disease-causing missense mutations in the conserved helicase core caused the disruption of its ATPase and helicase activity. The protein interactome of DHX30 however, was unchanged indicating that the pathogenic missense-mutations do not cause misfolding of DHX30, but rather specifically affect its catalytic activity. DHX30 localizes predominantly in the cytoplasm where it forms a complex with ribosomes and polysomes. Using a cross-linking mass spectrometry approach, a direct interaction of the N-terminal double strand RNA binding domain of DHX30 with sites next to the ribosome’s mRNA entry channel and the subunit interface was uncovered. RNA sequencing of DHX30 knockout cells revealed a strong de-regulation of mRNAs involved in neurogenesis and nervous system development, which is in line with the NEDMIAL disease phenotype. The knockdown of DHX30 results in a decreased 80S peak in polysome gradients, indicating that DHX30 has an effect on the translation machinery. Sequencing of the pool of active translating mRNAs revealed that upon DHX30 knockout mainly 5’TOP mRNAs are downregulated. These mRNAs are coding for proteins of the translational machinery and translation initiation factors. This study identified DHX30 as a factor of the translation machinery that selectively impacts the expression of a subset of proteins and provides insight on the etiology of NEDMIAL.
mRNA is co- or post-transcriptionally processed from a precursor mRNA to a mature mRNA. In addition to 5'capping and splicing, these modifications also include polyadenylation, the addition of a polyA tail to the 3'end of the mRNA. In recent years, alternative polyadenylation in particular has increasingly been taken into account as a mechanism for regulating gene expression. It is assumed that approximately 70-75 % of human protein coding genes contain alternative polyadenylation signals, which are often located within intronic sequences of protein-coding genes. The use of such polyadenylation signals leads to shortened mRNA transcripts and thus to the generation of C-terminal shortened protein isoforms.
Interestingly, the majority of microRNAs, small non-coding RNAs that play an essential role in post-transcriptional gene regulation, are also encoded in intronic sequences of protein-coding genes and are co-transcriptionally expressed with their host genes. The biogenesis of microRNA has been well studied and is well known, but mechanisms that may influence the expression regulation of mature microRNAs are just poorly understood.
In the presented work, I aimed to investigate the influence of alternative intronic polyadenylation on the biogenesis of microRNAs. The human ion channel TRPM1 could already be associated with melanoma pathogenesis and truncated isoforms of this protein have already been described in literature. In addition, TRPM1 harbors a microRNA, miR211, in its sixth intron, which is assumed to act as a tumor suppressor. Since both, TRPM1 and miR211 have already been associated with melanoma pathogenesis, the shift towards truncated transcripts during the development of various cancers is already known and it has been shown that certain microRNAs play a crucial role in the development and progression of melanoma, melanoma cell lines were used as an in vitro model for these investigations.
Cellular proteome profiling revealed that most biomolecules do not exist in isolation, but rather are incorporated into modular complexes. These assembled complexes are usually very large, consisting of 10 subunits on an average and include either proteins alone, or proteins and nucleic acids. Consequently, such macromolecular assemblies rather than individual biopolymers perform the vast majority of cellular activities. The faithful assembly of such molecular assemblies is often aided by trans-acting factors in vivo, to preclude aggregation of complex components and/or non-cognate interactions. A paradigm for an assisted assembly of a macromolecular machine is the formation of the common Sm/LSm core of spliceosomal and histone-mRNA processing U snRNPs. The key assembly factors united in the Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and the Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) complexes orchestrate the assembly of the Sm/LSm core on the U snRNAs. Assembly is initiated by the PRMT5-complex subunit pICln, which pre-arranges the Sm/LSm proteins into spatial positions occupied in the mature U snRNPs. The SMN complex subsequently binds these Sm/LSm units, displaces pICln and catalyses the Sm ring closure on the Sm-site of the U snRNA.
The SMN complex consists of the eponoymous SMN protein linked in a modular network of interactions with eight other proteins, termed Gemins 2-8 and Unrip. Despite functional and structural characterisation of individual protein components and/or sub-complexes of this assembly machinery, coherent understanding of the structural framework of the core SMN complex remained elusive. The current work, employing a combined approach of biochemical and structural studies, aimed to contribute to the understanding of how distinct modules within the SMN complex coalecse to form the macromolecular SMN complex.
A novel atomic resolution (1.5 Å) structure of the human Gemin8:7:6 sub-complex, illustrates how the peripheral Gemin7:6 module is tethered to the SMN complex via Gemin8’s C-terminus. In this model, Gemin7 engages with both Gemin6 and Gemin8 via the N- and C-termini of its Sm-fold like domain. This highly conserved interaction mode is reflected in the pronounced sequence conservation and identical biochemical behaviour of similar sub-complexes from divergent species, namely S. pombe and C. elegans.
Despite lacking significant sequence similarity to the Sm proteins, the dimeric Gemin7:6 complex share structural resemblance to the Sm heteromers. The hypothesis that the dimeric Gemin7:6 functions as a Sm-surrogate during Sm core assembly could not be confirmed in this work. The functional relevance of the structural mimicry of the dimeric Gemin7:6 sub-complex with the Sm heterodimers therefore still remains unclear.
Reduced levels of functional SMN protein is the cause of the devastating neurodegenerative disease, Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). The C-terminal YG-zipper motif of SMN is a major hot-spot for most SMA patient mutations. In this work, adding to the existing inventory of the human and fission yeast YG-box models, a novel 2.2 Å crystal structure of the nematode SMN’s YG-box domain adopting the glycine zipper motif has been reported. Furthermore, it could be assessed that SMA patient mutations mapping to this YG-box domain greatly influences SMN’s self-association competency, a property reflected in both the human and nematode YG-box biochemical handles. The shared molecular architecture and biochemical behaviour of the nematode SMN YG-box domain with its human and fission yeast counterparts, reiterates the pronounced conservation of this oligomerisation motif across divergent organisms.
Apart from serving as a multimerization domain, SMN’s YG-box also acts as interaction platform for Gemin8. A systematic investigation of SMA causing missense mutations uncovered that Gemin8’s incorporation into the SMN complex is influenced by the presence of certain SMA patient mutations, albeit independent of SMN’s oligomerisation status. Consequently, loss of Gemin8 association in the presence of SMA patient mutations would also affect the incorporation of Gemin7:6 sub-complex. Gemin8, therefore sculpts the heteromeric SMN complex by bridging the Gemin7:6 and SMN:Gemin2 sub-units, a modular feature shared in both the human and nematode SMN complexes.
These findings provide an important foundation and a prospective structural framework for elucidating the core architecture of the SMN complex in the ongoing Cryo-EM studies.