004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Keywords
- PROLOG <Programmiersprache> (2) (remove)
Institute
The landscape of today’s programming languages is manifold. With the diversity of applications, the difficulty of adequately addressing and specifying the used programs increases. This often leads to newly designed and implemented domain-specific languages. They enable domain experts to express knowledge in their preferred format, resulting in more readable and concise programs. Due to its flexible and declarative syntax without reserved keywords, the logic programming language Prolog is particularly suitable for defining and embedding domain-specific languages.
This thesis addresses the questions and challenges that arise when integrating domain-specific languages into Prolog. We compare the two approaches to define them either externally or internally, and provide assisting tools for each. The grammar of a formal language is usually defined in the extended Backus–Naur form. In this work, we handle this formalism as a domain-specific language in Prolog, and define term expansions that allow to translate it into equivalent definite clause grammars. We present the package library(dcg4pt) for SWI-Prolog, which enriches them by an additional argument to automatically process the term’s corresponding parse tree. To simplify the work with definite clause grammars, we visualise their application by a web-based tracer.
The external integration of domain-specific languages requires the programmer to keep the grammar, parser, and interpreter in sync. In many cases, domain-specific languages can instead be directly embedded into Prolog by providing appropriate operator definitions. In addition, we propose syntactic extensions for Prolog to expand its expressiveness, for instance to state logic formulas with their connectives verbatim. This allows to use all tools that were originally written for Prolog, for instance code linters and editors with syntax highlighting. We present the package library(plammar), a standard-compliant parser for Prolog source code, written in Prolog. It is able to automatically infer from example sentences the required operator definitions with their classes and precedences as well as the required Prolog language extensions. As a result, we can automatically answer the question: Is it possible to model these example sentences as valid Prolog clauses, and how?
We discuss and apply the two approaches to internal and external integrations for several domain-specific languages, namely the extended Backus–Naur form, GraphQL, XPath, and a controlled natural language to represent expert rules in if-then form. The created toolchain with library(dcg4pt) and library(plammar) yields new application opportunities for static Prolog source code analysis, which we also present.
Modern software is often realized as a modular combination of subsystems for, e. g.,
knowledge management, visualization, verification, or the interaction with users. As
a result, software libraries from possibly different programming languages have to
work together. Even more complex the case is if different programming paradigms
have to be combined. This type of diversification of programming languages and
paradigms in just one software application can only be mastered by mechanisms
for a seamless integration of the involved programming languages. However, the
integration of the common logic programming language Prolog and the popular
object-oriented programming language Java is complicated by various interoperability
problems which stem on the one hand from the paradigmatic gap between the
programming languages, and on the other hand, from the diversity of the available
Prolog systems.
The subject of the thesis is the investigation of novel mechanisms for the integration
of logic programming in Prolog and object–oriented programming in Java. We are
particularly interested in an object–oriented, uniform approach which is not specific
to just one Prolog system. Therefore, we have first identified several important
criteria for the seamless integration of Prolog and Java from the object–oriented
perspective. The main contribution of the thesis is a novel integration framework
called the Connector Architecture for Prolog and Java (CAPJa). The framework is
completely implemented in Java and imposes no modifications to the Java Virtual
Machine or Prolog. CAPJa provides a semi–automated mechanism for the integration
of Prolog predicates into Java. For compact, readable, and object–oriented
queries to Prolog, CAPJa exploits lambda expressions with conditional and relational
operators in Java. The communication between Java and Prolog is based
on a fully automated mapping of Java objects to Prolog terms, and vice versa. In
Java, an extensible system of gateways provides connectivity with various Prolog
system and, moreover, makes any connected Prolog system easily interchangeable,
without major adaption in Java.