Graduate School of Life Sciences
Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (4)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (4)
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2020 (4) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (4)
Sprache
- Englisch (4)
Schlagworte
- A2B adenosine receptor (1)
- A2BAR (1)
- Adenosinrezeptor (1)
- Brustkrebs (1)
- CAMP production (1)
- Chemokine receptors (1)
- FRET sensors (1)
- Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (1)
- G protein-coupled receptor kinase (1)
- G protein-coupled receptors (1)
Institut
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (4) (entfernen)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Recently, it was shown that MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells express very high levels of the A2BAR as the sole adenosine receptor subtype, and stimulation of the A2BAR in MDA-MB-231 cells triggers an unusual inhibitory signal on ERK1/2 phosphorylation. The ERK1/2 pathway is reported to be associated with the control of growth, proliferation and differentiation of cells and as such might serve as a promising target for tumor treatment. The present study investigated signaling mechanisms involved in linking A2BAR to ERK1/2 phosphorylation in MDA-MB-231 cells. The A2BAR mediated reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation and of proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cell is in good agreement with previous results from (Dubey et al., 2005). These observations provide support to the hypothesis that activation of A2BAR could attenuate the growth of some types of cancer cell and argue against a stimulation of proliferation resulting from the activation of A2BAR as discussed by (Fernandez-Gallardo et al., 2016). AC activation by forskolin has recently been shown to enhance the activity of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin in TNBC cells via a mechanism dependent on the PKA-mediated inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Furthermore, forskolin also increased the sensitivity of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 triple negative breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and taxol (Illiano et al., 2018), and sustains the evidence of anticancer activity mediated by cAMP/PKA-mediated ERK1/2 inhibition. Similar to these studies, a reduced amount of pERK1/2 was also observed after stimulation of AC with FSK, application of cAMP-AM or inhibition of PDE-4. The inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was mimicked by UTP and abolished with the PLC inhibitor U73122 or by chelating intracellular Ca2+ with BAPTA-AM. These results point to an important role for both cAMP and Ca2+ signaling in the pathway leading to a decrease in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. This study encourages the idea that A2BAR could be used as target in cancer therapy. But A2BAR did not only stimulate signaling cascades associated with cell survival and proliferation reduction, but also key phases relevant in angiogenesis like Ca2+ mobilization (Kohn et al., 1995). Whereas the potency toward AC and Ca2+ are similar for the diverse agonists, the potency to promote ERK1/2 reduction is much higher. Interestingly, the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells is inhibited by low nanomolar agonist concentration which is inactive in Ca2+ mobilization. This means that it is certainly possible to reduce the proliferation without promoting angiogenesis. LUF6210 is particularly interesting when considering that it preferentially stimulates a reduction in ERK1/2 phosphorylation over Ca2+ and therefore may not promote angiogenesis. LUF6210 is therapeutically appealing as adjuvant in treatment of cancer. Given that stimulation of AC can activate a reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation and proliferation in cancer cells, agonist bias toward Gs-AC-PKA-mediated ERK1/2 inhibition represent a potential therapy of various malignancies. The fact that the reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation followed by reduced proliferation observed in MDA-MB-231 cells were mediated by the activation of the A2BAR illustrates the importance of this receptor subtype in cancer. A2BARs must be considered as a key factor in cancer treatment and deserve attention for the development of new therapeutic strategies.
G protein coupled receptor kinases (GRK) phosphorylate and thereby desensitize G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) including β-adrenergic receptors (βAR), which are critical regulators of cardiac function. We identified the Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) as an endogenous inhibitor of GRK2 that leads to increased cardiac contractility via βAR activation. RKIP binds to the N-terminus (aa1-185) of GRK2, which is important for the GRK2/receptor interaction. Thereby it interferes with the GRK2/receptor interaction without interference with cytosolic GRK2 target activation. In this project, the RKIP/GRK interface was investigated to develop strategies that simulate the effects of RKIP on βAR.
RKIP binding to different isoforms of GRK expressed in the heart was analyzed by protein interaction assays using full-length and N-termini of GRK2, GRK3 and GRK5: 1-53, 54-185 and 1-185. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IPs) and pull-down assays revealed that RKIP binds to the peptides of GRK2 and GRK3 but not to the ones of GRK5, which suggests the existence of several binding sites of RKIP within the N-termini of GRK2 and GRK3. To analyze whether the peptides of GRK2 and GRK3 are able to simulate the RKIP mediated interference of the GRK2/receptor interaction, we analyzed the β2-AR phosphorylation in the absence and presence of the peptides. Interestingly, N-termini (aa1-185) of GRK2 and GRK3 reduced β2AR phosphorylation to a comparable extent as RKIP. In line with reduced receptor phosphorylation, the peptides also reduced isoproterenol-stimulated receptor internalization as shown by [3H] CGP-12177 radioligand binding assay and fluorescence microscopy compared to control cells. Subsequently, these peptides increased downstream signaling of β2AR, i.e. the phosphorylation of the PKA substrate phosducin. In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism behind the observed effects, Co-IPs were performed in order to investigate whether the peptides bind directly to the β2-AR and block its phosphorylation by GRK2. Indeed, GRK2 1-185 and GRK3 1-185 could bind the receptor, suggesting that this way GRK2 is prevented from inhibiting the receptor. To investigate the physiological effect of GRK2 1-185, GRK3 1-185 and GRK5 1-185, their effect on neonatal mouse cardiomyocyte contractility and hypertrophy was analyzed. After long-term isoproterenol stimulation, in the presence of GRK2 1 185 and GRK3 1-185 the cross-sectional area of the cardiomyocytes showed no significant increase in comparison to the unstimulated control cells. In addition, upon isoproterenol stimulation, GRK2 1-185 and GRK3 1-185 increased the beat rate in cardiomyocytes, mimicking RKIP while the base impedance, an indicator of viability, remained stable.
The N-termini (1-185) of GRK2 and GRK3 simulated RKIP’s function and had a significant influence on β2AR phosphorylation, on its downstream signaling and internalization, could bind β2-AR, increased beat rate and did not significantly induce hypertrophy, suggesting that they may serve as a model for the generation of new and more specific targeting strategies for GRK mediated receptor regulation.
The CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) are seven transmembrane receptors that are involved in numerous pathologies, including several types of cancers. Both receptors bind the same chemokine, CXCL12, leading to significantly different outcomes. While CXCR4 activation generally leads to canonical GPCR signaling, involving Gi proteins and β‐arrestins, ACKR3, which is predominantly found in intracellular vesicles, has been shown to signal via β‐arrestin‐dependent signaling pathways. Understanding the dynamics and kinetics of their activation in response to their ligands is of importance to understand how signaling proceeds via these two receptors.
In this thesis, different Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)‐based approaches have been combined to individually investigate the early events of their signaling cascades. In order to investigate receptor activation, intramolecular FRET sensors for CXCR4 and ACKR3 were developed by using the pair of fluorophores cyan fluorescence protein and fluorescence arsenical hairpin binder. The sensors, which exhibited similar functional properties to their wild‐type counterparts, allowed to monitor their ligand-induced conformational changes and represent the first RET‐based receptor sensors in the field of chemokine receptors. Additional FRET‐based settings were also established to investigate the coupling of receptors with G proteins, rearrangements within dimers, as well as G protein activation. On one hand, CXCR4 showed a complex activation mechanism in response to CXCL12 that involved rearrangements in the transmembrane domain of the receptor followed by rearrangements between the receptor and the G protein as well as rearrangements between CXCR4 protomers, suggesting a role of homodimers in the activation course of this receptor. This was followed by a prolonged activation of Gi proteins, but not Gq activation, via the axis CXCL12/CXCR4. In contrast, the structural rearrangements at each step of the signaling cascade in response to macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) were dynamically and kinetically different and no Gi protein activation via this axis was detected. These findings suggest distinct mechanisms of action of CXCL12 and MIF on CXCR4 and provide evidence for a new type of sequential signaling events of a GPCR. Importantly, evidence in this work revealed that CXCR4 exhibits some degree of constitutive activity, a potentially important feature for drug development. On the other hand, by cotransfecting the ACKR3 sensor with K44A dynamin, it was possible to increase its presence in the plasma membrane and measure the ligand‐induced activation of this receptor. Different kinetics of ACKR3 activation were observed in response to CXCL12 and three other agonists by means of using the receptor sensor developed in this thesis, showing that it is a valuable tool to study the activation of this atypical receptor and pharmacologically characterize ligands. No CXCL12‐induced G protein activation via ACKR3 was observed even when the receptor was re-localized to the plasma membrane by means of using the mutant dynamin. Altogether, this thesis work provides the temporal resolution of signaling patterns of two chemokine receptors for the first time as well as valuable tools that can be applied to characterize their activation in response to pharmacologically relevant ligands.
Investigation of dynamic processes of prototypical class A GPCRs by single-molecule microscopy
(2020)
In this work, two projects were pursued.
In the first project, I investigated two different subtypes of opioid receptors, which play a key role as target for analgesia. A set of subtype specific fluorescent ligands for μ opioid receptor (MOR) and δ opioid receptor (DOR) was characterised and used to gain insights into the diffusion behaviour of those receptors. It was shown that the novel ligands hold photophysical and pharmacological properties making them suitable for single-molecule microscopy. Applying them to wild-type receptors expressed in living cells revealed that both sub-types possess a heterogeneous diffusion behaviour. Further- more, the fluorescent ligands for the MOR were used to investigate homodomerisation, a highly debated topic. The results reveal that only ≈ 5 % of the receptors are present as homodimers, and thus the majority is monomeric. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a major role as drug targets. Accordingly, understanding the activation process is very important. For a long time GPCRs have been believed to be either active or inactive. In recent years several studies have shown, that the reality is more complex, involving more substates. [1, 2, 3, 4] In this work the α 2A AR was chosen to investigate the activation process on a single-molecule level, thus being able to distinguish also rare or short-lived events that are hidden in ensemble mea- surements. With this aim, the receptor was labelled intracellular with two fluorophores using supported membranes. Thus it was possible to acquire movies showing qualita- tively smFRET events. Unfortunately, the functionality of the used construct could not be demonstrated. To recover the functionality the CLIP-tag in the third intracellular loop was replaced successfully with an amber codon. This stop codon was used to insert an unnatural amino acid. Five different mutants were created and tested and the most promising candidate could be identified. First ensemble FRET measurements indicated that the functionality might be recovered but further improvements would be needed. Overall, I could show that single-molecule microscopy is a versatile tool to investigate the behaviour of typical class A GPCRs. I was able to show that MOR are mostly monomeric under physiological expression levels. Furthermore, I could establish intra- cellular labelling with supported membranes and acquire qualitative smFRET events.