150 Psychologie
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (13)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (13)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (13)
Keywords
- Angst (13) (remove)
Bei der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung von Furcht und Angsterkrankungen stellt, neben der Furchtkonditionierung, die Generalisierung der konditionierten Furcht einen wesentlichen Mechanismus dar. Die der Generalisierung zugrunde liegenden psychologischen und biologischen Prozesse sind jedoch beim Menschen bisher nur wenig untersucht.
Ziel dieser Arbeit war, anhand eines neu entwickelten experimentellen Paradigmas den Einfluss eines psychometrisch bestimmbaren angstspezifischen Faktors sowie der mit Furcht und Angst assoziierten Genotypen Stathmin1, COMT Val158Met und BDNF Val66Met auf die Furchtkonditionierung und Generalisierung konditionierter Furcht zu untersuchen und somit mögliche Risikofaktoren für die Entstehung von Angsterkrankungen zu bestimmen. Hierfür wurden N = 126 gesunde Versuchspersonen (n = 69 weiblich; mittleres Alter M = 23.05, SD = 3.82) für die genannten Polymorphismen genotypisiert und zu ängstlichen und affektiven Symptomen befragt. In einer Akquisitionsphase wurden den Probanden zwei neutrale weibliche Gesichter präsentiert (CS), von denen eines mit einem Schrei sowie einem ängstlichen Gesichtsausdruck (UCS) gepaart wurde. Der sich anschließende Generalisierungstest erfolgte anhand von vier Gesichtern, die in der Ähnlichkeit zwischen den beiden CS schrittweise übergingen. Die Furchtreaktion wurde über die Bewertung von Valenz, Arousal und Kontingenzerwartung sowie über die Hautleitfähigkeitsreaktion (SCR) erfasst.
Die Analyse der Fragebögen anhand einer Hauptachsenanalyse und anhand von Strukturgleichungsmodellen erbrachte eine zweifaktorielle Lösung, die die Konstrukte Depression und Angst abbildete. Nur der Faktor Angst war mit einer veränderten Furchtkonditionierung und Furchtgeneralisierung assoziiert: Hoch Ängstliche zeigten eine stärkere konditionierte Furchtreaktion (Arousal) und wiesen eine stärkere Generalisierung der Valenzeinschätzung und Kontingenzerwartung auf. Für den Stathmin1 Genotyp ergaben sich geschlechtsspezifische Effekte. Bei den männlichen Versuchspersonen zeigte sich in Folge der Akquisition ein stärkerer Abfall der Valenz für den CS+ in der Gruppe der Stathmin1 T Allelträger, die ebenfalls eine stärkere Generalisierung der Furchtreaktion, abgebildet in allen verbalen Maßen, aufwiesen. Ein gegenteiliger Befund ergab sich für die Gruppe der Frauen, insofern eine mit dem Stathmin1 C Allel assoziierte höhere Generalisierung der Valenz, des Arousals und der Kontingenzerwartung festgestellt werden konnte. Für den COMT Val158Met Genotyp ergaben sich keine Einflüsse auf die Akquisition der konditionierten Furcht. Für Träger des COMT 158Val Allels zeigte sich jedoch eine stärkere Generalisierung der Valenz und der Kontingenzerwartung. Auch für den BDNF Val66Met Genotyp konnte keine Veränderung der Furchtakquisition beobachtet werden. Es ergaben sich jedoch Hinweise auf eine erhöhte Generalisierung der Kontingenzerwartung in der Gruppe der BDNF 66Val Homozygoten. Für keinen der beschriebenen Faktoren konnte ein Einfluss auf die Furchtkonditionierung oder deren Generalisierung anhand der SCR abgebildet werden.
Unsere Ergebnisse weisen auf einen psychometrisch erfassbaren Faktor und genetische Einflüsse hin, die über den Prozess einer stärkeren Generalisierung der konditionierten Furcht das Risiko für die Entstehung von Angsterkrankungen erhöhen können. Jedoch sollten die Befunde in größeren Stichproben repliziert werden. Neben der frühzeitigen Identifikation von Risikofaktoren sollten in zukünftigen Studien darüber hinaus wirksame Maßnahmen zur Prävention und Intervention entwickelt werden, um diesem Risiko entgegen zu wirken.
In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde untersucht, inwiefern die Angstaktivierung Einfluss auf den Therapieprozess und den Therapieerfolg bei der Behandlung spezifischer Phobien hat. Obwohl expositionsbasierte Therapieverfahren nachweislich effektiv sind und vor allem bei der Behandlung spezifischer Phobien als die Methode der Wahl gelten, sind deren genauen Wirkmechanismen doch noch nicht völlig geklärt. In zwei empirischen Studien wurde hier die von Foa und Kozak (1986, 1991) in der „Emotional Processing Theory“ als notwendig postulierte Rolle der Angstaktivierung während der Exposition untersucht. In der ersten Studie wurde auf Grundlage tier- und humanexperimenteller Befunde untersucht, ob durch eine Reaktivierung der Angst und darauffolgende Exposition innerhalb eines bestimmten Zeitfensters (= Rekonsolidierungsfenster) die Rückkehr der Angst verhindert werden kann. Ziel dieser Untersuchung war die Übertragung bisheriger Ergebnisse aus Konditionierungsstudien auf eine klinische Stichprobe. Die spinnenphobischen Untersuchungsteilnehmer (N = 36) wurden randomisiert entweder der Reaktivierungsgruppe (RG) oder einer Standardexpositionsgruppe (SEG) zugewiesen. Die RG bekam vor der Exposition in virtueller Realität (VRET) fünf Sekunden lang einen Reaktivierungsstimulus - eine virtuelle Spinne - dargeboten, woraufhin zehn Minuten standardisierte Wartezeit folgte. In der SEG wurde die Angst vor der Exposition nicht reaktiviert. 24 Stunden nach der VRET wurde in einem Test die spontane Rückkehr der Angst erfasst. Entgegen der Annahmen führte die Reaktivierung vor der VRET nicht zu einer geringeren Rückkehr der Angst in der Testsitzung 24 Stunden später. Die Angst kehrte in keiner der beiden Versuchsgruppen zurück, was sich bezüglich subjektiver Angstratings, für Verhaltensdaten und auch für physiologische Maße zeigte. Auch zeigte sich ein grundsätzlich positiver Effekt der Behandlung, bei der im Anschluss noch eine Exposition in vivo stattfand. Ein Follow-Up nach sechs Monaten ergab eine weitere Reduktion der Spinnenangst. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass sich die experimentellen Befunde zu Rekonsolidierungsprozessen aus Konditionierungsstudien nicht einfach auf ein Therapiesetting und die Behandlung spezifischer Phobien übertragen lassen. Die zweite Studie befasste sich mit der Frage, ob Koffein die initiale Angstaktivierung erhöhen kann und ob sich dies positiv auf den Therapieerfolg auswirkt. Die spinnenphobischen Studienteilnehmer (N = 35) wurden in einem doppelblinden Versuchsdesign entweder der Koffeingruppe (KOFG) oder der Placebogruppe (PG) zugeordnet. Die KOFG erhielt eine Stunde vor Beginn der VRET eine Koffeintablette mit 200 mg Koffein, die PG erhielt als Äquivalent zur gleichen Zeit eine Placebotablette. Eine Analyse der Speichelproben der Probanden ergab, dass sich die Koffeinkonzentration durch die Koffeintablette signifikant erhöhte. Dies führte jedoch nicht, wie erwartet, zu einer höheren Angstaktivierung während der VRET, weshalb unter anderem diskutiert wird, ob evtl. die Koffeinkonzentration zu niedrig war, um anxiogen zu wirken. Dennoch profitierten die Teilnehmer beider Versuchsgruppen von unserem Behandlungsangebot. Die Spinnenangst reduzierte sich signifikant über vier Sitzungen hinweg. Diese Reduktion blieb stabil bis zum Follow-Up drei Monate nach Studienende. Zusammengefasst lässt sich zur optimalen Höhe der Angstaktivierung aufgrund der hier durchgeführten beiden Studien keine exakte Aussage machen, da sich die Versuchsgruppen in beiden Studien hinsichtlich der Höhe der Angstaktivierung zu Beginn (und auch während) der Exposition nicht unterschieden. Es lässt sich aber festhalten, dass die VRET und auch die in vivo Exposition in beiden Studien effektiv Angst auslösten und dass sich die Angst in beiden Gruppen signifikant bis zu den Follow-Ups (sechs bzw. drei Monate nach Studienende) signifikant reduzierte. Die Behandlung kann also als erfolgreich angesehen werden. Mögliche andere Wirkfaktoren der Expositionstherapie, wie z.B. die Rolle der wahrgenommenen Kontrolle werden neben der Höhe der Angstaktivierung diskutiert.
Hintergrund: Der implantierbare Kardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) stellt bei der Prävention von lebensbedrohlichen Herzrhythmusstörungen die Therapie der Wahl dar. ICD-Patienten berichten jedoch überdurchschnittlich häufig von Ängsten und einer eingeschränkten Lebensqualität. Ziel: In dieser Studie wurde ein speziell für ICD-Patienten entwickeltes Präventionsprogramm gegen Ängste evaluiert. Dieses beinhaltet zum einen gedruckte Informationen darüber, wie Ängste frühzeitig erkannt werden können und welche Hilfsmöglichkeiten es gibt. Zum anderen bietet es Patienten die Möglichkeit, einem telefonischen Ansprechpartner (Dipl.-Psych.) Fragen zum ICD zu stellen und über psychische Belastungen und Möglichkeiten zu deren Linderung zu sprechen. Gleichzeitig wurde in dieser Studie die Möglichkeit untersucht, die Ängste der Patienten, die nach der Anpassungsphase entstehen, vorherzusagen. Methoden: 119 ICD-Patienten füllten zu zwei Zeitpunkten (30 Tage nach der Implantation und 6 Monate später) psychometrische Fragebögen zur Erfassung von Ängsten aus (z.B. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Nach der ersten Messung wurden die Patienten teilrandomisiert (Schichtung nach Indikation, Alter und Geschlecht) zwei Gruppen zugewiesen. Eine Gruppe nahm zwischen den beiden Messzeitpunkten zusätzlich zur medizinischen Betreuung am beschriebenen Präventionsprogramm teil, die andere Gruppe erhielt keine zusätzliche Betreuung. Zur Prädiktion der späteren Angstwerte wurden Regressionsanalysen durchgeführt. Als Prädiktoren dienten die Charakteristiken der Patienten, die zum ersten Messzeitpunkt erhoben worden waren. Kriterium war die Angst der Patienten zum zweiten Messzeitpunkt. Ergebnisse: Das Präventionsprogramm wurde von allen ICD-Patienten gut angenommen und von vielen Patienten (75%) als hilfreich beurteilt. Entgegen der Erwartungen unterschieden sich die beiden Gruppen hinsichtlich der Angstentwicklung jedoch nicht voneinander. Die differenzierte Analyse zeigte, dass die Wirkung des Präventionsprogramms auf die Angst der Patienten von deren Alter abhing (p = 0,01). Bei den jüngeren ICD-Patienten (30-64 Jahre) ließ sich durch das Programm ein Anstieg der Ängste im Halbjahr nach der Implantation verhindern. Die subjektiv berichteten Ängste der behandelten Gruppe der älteren Patienten (65-75 Jahre) entwickelten sich jedoch ungünstiger als die der Kontrollgruppe. Jüngere Patienten berichteten nach der Implantation generell über mehr Einschränkungen durch den ICD und fühlten sich weniger gut durch ihn geschützt als ältere Patienten. In der Kontrollgruppe war die Vorhersage der Angst zum zweiten Messzeitpunkt am Besten durch die Einstellung der Patienten zum ICD möglich. In der Experimentalgruppe war die Angstsensitivität der Patienten der beste Prädiktor. Schlussfolgerung: Jüngere Patienten profitierten vom auf Informationen und Gesprächen basierenden Präventionsprogramm. Ältere Patienten dagegen berichteten subjektiv über mehr Ängste, obwohl sie das Präventionsprogramm auch als hilfreich erachteten. Für diese Patientengruppe müssen somit andere Möglichkeiten der notwendigen psychosozialen Unterstützung gefunden werden.
Fear conditioning is an efficient model of associative learning, which has greatly improved our knowledge of processes underlying the development and maintenance of pathological fear and anxiety. In a differential fear conditioning paradigm, one initially neutral stimulus (NS) is paired with an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus, US), whereas another stimulus does not have any consequences. After a few pairings the NS is associated with the US and consequently becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS+), which elicits a conditioned response (CR).
The formation of explicit knowledge of the CS/US association during conditioning is referred to as contingency awareness. Findings about its role in fear conditioning are ambiguous. The development of a CR without contingency awareness has been shown in delay fear conditioning studies. One speaks of delay conditioning, when the US coterminates with or follows directly on the CS+. In trace conditioning, a temporal gap or “trace interval” lies between CS+ and US. According to existing evidence, trace conditioning is not possible on an implicit level and requires more cognitive resources than delay conditioning.
The associations formed during fear conditioning are not exclusively associations between specific cues and aversive events. Contextual cues form the background milieu of the learning process and play an important role in both acquisition and the extinction of conditioned fear and anxiety. A common limitation in human fear conditioning studies is the lack of ecological validity, especially regarding contextual information. The use of Virtual Reality (VR) is a promising approach for creating a more complex environment which is close to a real life situation.
I conducted three studies to examine cue and contextual fear conditioning with regard to the role of contingency awareness. For this purpose a VR paradigm was created, which allowed for exact manipulation of cues and contexts as well as timing of events. In all three experiments, participants were guided through one or more virtual rooms serving as contexts, in which two different lights served as CS and an electric stimulus as US. Fear potentiated startle (FPS) responses were measured as an indicator of implicit fear conditioning. To test whether participants had developed explicit awareness of the CS-US contingencies, subjective ratings were collected.
The first study was designed as a pilot study to test the VR paradigm as well as the conditioning protocol. Additionally, I was interested in the effect of contingency awareness. Results provided evidence, that eye blink conditioning is possible in the virtual environment and that it does not depend on contingency awareness. Evaluative conditioning, as measured by subjective ratings, was only present in the group of participants who explicitly learned the association between CS and US.
To examine acquisition and extinction of both fear associated cues and contexts, a novel cue-context generalization paradigm was applied in the second study. Besides the interplay of cues and contexts I was again interested in the effect of contingency awareness. Two different virtual offices served as fear and safety context, respectively. During acquisition, the CS+ was always followed by the US in the fear context. In the safety context, none of the lights had any consequences. During extinction, a additional (novel) context was introduced, no US was delivered in any of the contexts. Participants showed enhanced startle responses to the CS+ compared to the CS- in the fear context. Thus, discriminative learning took place regarding both cues and contexts during acquisition. This was confirmed by subjective ratings, although only for participants with explicit contingency awareness. Generalization of fear to the novel context after conditioning did not depend on awareness and was observable only on trend level.
In a third experiment I looked at neuronal correlates involved in extinction of fear memory by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Of particular interest were differences between extinction of delay and trace fear conditioning. I applied the paradigm tested in the pilot study and additionally manipulated timing of the stimuli: In the delay conditioning group (DCG) the US was administered with offset of one light (CS+), in the trace conditioning group (TCG) the US was presented 4s after CS+ offset. Most importantly, prefrontal activation differed between the two groups. In line with existing evidence, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) was activated in the DCG. In the TCG I found activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which might be associated with modulation of working memory processes necessary for bridging the trace interval and holding information in short term memory.
Taken together, virtual reality proved to be an elegant tool for examining human fear conditioning in complex environments, and especially for manipulating contextual information. Results indicate that explicit knowledge of contingencies is necessary for attitude formation in fear conditioning, but not for a CR on an implicit level as measured by FPS responses. They provide evidence for a two level account of fear conditioning. Discriminative learning was successful regarding both cues and contexts. Imaging results speak for different extinction processes in delay and trace conditioning, hinting that higher working memory contribution is required for trace than for delay conditioning.
Cognitive views of the psychopathology of anxiety propose that attentional biases toward threatening information play a substantial role in the disorders’ etiology and maintenance. For healthy subjects, converging evidence show that threatening stimuli attract attention and lead to enhanced activation in visual processing areas. It is assumed that this preferential processing of threat occurs at a preattentive level and is followed by fast attentional engagement. High-anxious individuals show augmented tendencies to selectively attend toward fear-relevant cues (Mathews, 1990) and exhibit elevated neural processing of threatening cues compared to non-anxious individuals (Dilger et al., 2003). Regarding attentional biases in high-anxious subjects, it remains unanswered up to now whether initial engagement of attention toward threat or difficulties to disengage from threat is an underlying mechanism. Furthermore, little is known whether the preferential (attentive) processing of threatening cues does influence perceptional outcomes of anxious subjects. In order to directly study separate components of attentional bias the first study of this dissertation was a combined reaction time and eye-tracking experiment. Twenty one spider phobic patients and 21 control participants were instructed to search for a neutral target while ignoring task-irrelevant abrupt-onset distractor circles which contained either a small picture of a spider (phobic), a flower (non-phobic, but similar to spiders in shape), a mushroom (non-phobic, and not similar to spiders in shape), or small circles with no picture. As expected, patients’ reaction times to targets were longer on trials with spider distractors. However, analyses of eye movements revealed that this was not due to attentional capture by spider distractors; patients more often fixated on all distractors with pictures. Instead, reaction times were delayed by longer fixation durations on spider distractors. This result does not support automatic capture of attention by phobic cues but suggests that phobic patients fail to disengage attention from spiders. To assess whether preferential processing of phobic cues differentially affects visual perception in phobic patients compared to healthy controls, the second study of this dissertation used a binocular rivalry paradigm, where two incompatible pictures were presented to each eye. These pictures cannot be merged to a meaningful percept and temporarily, one picture predominates in conscious perception whereas the other is suppressed. 23 spider phobic patients and 20 non-anxious control participants were shown standardized pictures of spiders or flowers, each paired with a neutral pattern under conditions of binocular rivalry. Their task was to continuously indicate the predominant percept by key presses. Analyses show that spider phobic patients perceived the spider picture more often and longer as dominant compared to non-anxious control participants. Thus, predominance of phobic cues in binocular rivalry provides evidence that preferential processing of fear-relevant cues in the visual system actually leads to superior perception. In combination both studies support the notion that phobic patients process phobic cues preferentially within the visual system resulting in enhanced attention and perception. At early stages of visual processing, this is mainly reflected by delayed attentional disengagement and across time, preferential processing leads to improved perception of threat cues.
Sustained anxiety is considered as a chronic and future-oriented state of apprehension that does not belong to a specific object. It is discussed as an important characteristic of anxiety disorders including panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Experimentally, sustained anxiety can be induced by contextual fear conditioning in which aversive events are unpredictably presented and therefore the whole context becomes associated with the threat. This thesis aimed at investigating important mechanisms in the development and maintenance of sustained anxiety: (1) facilitated acquisition and resistant extinction of contextual anxiety due to genetic risk factors (Study 1), and (2) the return of contextual anxiety after successful extinction using a new reinstatement paradigm (Study 2). To this end, two contextual fear conditioning studies were conducted in virtual reality (VR). During acquisition one virtual office was paired with unpredictable mildly painful electric stimuli (unconditioned stimulus, US), thus becoming the anxiety context (CXT+). Another virtual office was never paired with any US, thus becoming the safety context (CXT-). Extinction was conducted 24 h later, i.e. no US was presented, and extinction recall was tested another 24 h later on Day 3. In both studies context-evoked anxiety was measured on three different response levels: behavioral (anxiety-potentiated startle reflex), physiological (skin conductance level), and verbal (explicit ratings). In Study 1, participants were stratified for 5-HTTLPR (S+ risk allele vs. LL no risk allele) and NPSR1 rs324981 (T+ risk allele vs. AA no risk allele) polymorphisms, resulting in four combined genotype groups with 20 participants each: S+/T+, S+/LL, LL/T+, and LL/AA. Results showed that acquisition of anxiety-potentiated startle was influenced by a gene × gene interaction: only carriers of both risk alleles (S+ carriers of the 5-HTTLPR and T+ carriers of the NPSR1 polymorphism) exhibited significantly higher startle magnitudes in CXT+ compared to CXT-. However, extinction recall as measured with anxiety-potentiated startle was not affected by any genotype. Interestingly, the explicit anxiety level, i.e. valence and anxiety ratings, was only influenced by the NPSR1 genotype, in a way that no risk allele carriers (AA) reported higher anxiety and more negative valence in response to CXT+ compared to CXT-, whereas risk allele carriers (T+) did not. Study 2 adopted nearly the same paradigm with the modification that one group (reinstatement group) received one unsignaled US at the beginning of the experimental session on Day 3 before seeing CXT+ and CXT-. The second group served as a control group and received no US, but was immediately exposed to CXT+ and CXT-. Results showed a return of anxiety on the implicit and explicit level (higher startle responses and anxiety ratings in response to CXT+ compared to CXT-) in the reinstatement group only. Most important, the return of contextual anxiety in the reinstatement group was associated with a change of state anxiety and mood from extinction to test, that is the more anxiety and negative mood participants experienced before the reinstatement procedure, the higher their return of anxiety was. In sum, results of Study 1 showed that facilitated contextual fear conditioning on an implicit behavioral level (startle response) could be regarded as an endophenotype for anxiety disorders, which can contribute to our understanding of the etiology of anxiety disorders. Results of Study 2 imply that anxiety and negative mood after extinction could be an important facilitator for the return of anxiety. Furthermore, the present VR-based contextual fear conditioning paradigm seems to be an ideal tool to experimentally study mechanisms underlying the acquisition and the return of anxiety. Future studies could investigate clinical samples and extend the VR paradigm to evolutionary-relevant contexts (e.g., heights, darkness, open spaces).
Social contact is an integral part of daily life. Its health-enhancing effects include reduced negative affective experiences of fear and anxiety, a phenomenon called social buffering. This dissertation studied different forms of social contact and their anxiety-buffering effects with diverse methodologies.
The laboratory-based first study investigated minimal social contact in the context of pain relief learning. Results showed that the observed decreased autonomic and increased subjective fear responses following pain relief learning were independent of social influence. The minimalistic and controlled social setting may have prevented social buffering. Study 2 targeted social buffering in daily life using Ecological Momentary Assessment. We repeatedly assessed individuals’ state anxiety, related cardiovascular responses, and aspects of social interactions with smartphones and portable sensors on five days. Analyses of over 1,500 social contacts revealed gender-specific effects, e.g., heart rate-reducing effects of familiarity in women, but not men. Study 3 examined anxiety, loneliness, and related social factors in the absence of social contact due to social distancing. We constructed and validated a scale measuring state and trait loneliness and isolation, and analysed its link to mental health. Results include a social buffering-like relation of lower anxiety with more trait sociability and sense of belonging.
In sum, the studies showed no fear reduction by minimal social contact, but buffering effects relating to social and personal factors in more complex social situations. Anxiety responses during daily social contacts were lower with more familiar or opposite-gender interaction partners. During limited social contact, lower anxiety related to inter-individual differences in sociability, social belonging, and loneliness. By taking research from lab to life, this dissertation underlined the diverse nature of social contact and its relevance to mental health.
Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent group of neuropsychiatric disorders and go along with high personal suffering. They often arise during childhood and show a progression across the life span, thus making this age a specific vulnerable period during development. Still most research about these disorders is done in adults. In light of this, it seems of utmost importance to identify predictive factors of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Temperament or personality traits have been proclaimed as risk markers for the development of subsequent anxiety disorders, but their exact interplay is not clear. In this dissertation an effort is made to contribute to the understanding of how risk markers of early temperamental traits, in this case Trait Anxiety, Anxiety Sensitivity and Separation Anxiety are interplaying. While Trait Anxiety is regarded as a more general tendency to react anxiously to threatening situations or stimuli (Unnewehr, Joormann, Schneider, & Margraf, 1992), Anxiety Sensitivity is the tendency to react with fear to one’s own anxious sensations (Allan et al., 2014; S. Reiss, Peterson, Gursky, & McNally, 1986), and Separation Anxiety is referring to the extent to which the child is avoiding certain situations because of the fear of being separated from primary care givers (In-Albon & Schneider, 2011). In addition, it will be addressed how these measurements are associated with negative life events, as well as brain functioning and if they are malleable by a prevention program in children and adolescents. In study 1 the aim was to extend the knowledge about the interrelations of this anxiety dimensions and negative life events. Results indicated positive correlations of all three anxiety traits as well as with negative life events. Thus, a close connection of all three anxiety measures as well as with negative life events could be indicated. The closest association was found between Anxiety Sensitivity and Trait Anxiety and between Separation Anxiety and Anxiety Sensitivity. Furthermore, negative life events functioned as mediator between Anxiety Sensitivity and Trait Anxiety, indicating that a part of the association was explained by negative life events. In study 2 we extended the findings from study 1 with neurobiological parameters and examined the influence of anxiety traits on emotional brain activation by administering the “emotional face matching task”. This task activated bilateral prefrontal regions as well as both hippocampi and the right amygdala. Further analyses indicated dimension-specific brain activations: Trait Anxiety was associated with a hyperactivation of the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and Separation Anxiety with a lower activation bilaterally in the IFG and the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG). Furthermore, the association between Separation Anxiety and Anxiety Sensitivity was moderated by bi-hemispheric Separation-Anxiety-related IFG activation. Thus, we could identify distinct brain activation patterns for the anxiety dimensions (Trait Anxiety and Separation Anxiety) and their associations (Separation Anxiety and Anxiety Sensitivity). The aim of study 3 was to probe the selective malleability of the anxiety dimensions via a prevention program in an at-risk population. We could identify a reduction of all three anxiety traits from pre- to post-prevention-assessment and that this effect was significant in Anxiety Sensitivity and Trait Anxiety scores. Furthermore, we found that pre-intervention Separation Anxiety and Anxiety Sensitivity post-intervention were associated. In addition, pre-interventive scores were correlated with the intervention-induced change within the measure (i.e., the higher the score before the intervention the higher the prevention-induced change) and pre-intervention Anxiety Sensitivity correlated with the change in Separation Anxiety scores. All relations, seemed to be direct, as mediation/moderation analyses with negative life events did not reveal any significant effect. These results are very promising, because research about anxiety prevention in children and adolescents is still rare and our results are indicating that cognitive-behavioural-therapy based prevention is gilding significant results in an indicated sample even when samples sizes are small like in our study.
In sum the present findings hint towards distinct mechanisms underlying the three different anxiety dimensions on a phenomenological and neurobiological level, though they are highly overlapping (Higa-McMillan, Francis, Rith-Najarian, & Chorpita, 2016; Taylor, 1998). Furthermore, the closest associations were found between Anxiety Sensitivity and Trait Anxiety, as well as between Separation Anxiety and Anxiety Sensitivity. Specifically, we were able to find a neuronal manifestation of the association between Separation Anxiety and Anxiety Sensitivity (Separation Anxiety-specific IFG activation) and a predictive potential on prevention influence. The results of these studies lead to a better understanding of the etiology of anxiety disorders and the interplay between different anxiety-related temperamental traits and could lead to further valuable knowledge about the intervention as well as further prevention strategies.
The etiology of anxiety disorders is multifactorial with contributions from both
genetic and environmental factors. Several susceptibility genes of anxiety disorders or
anxiety-related intermediate phenotypes have been identified, including the
serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) and the neuropeptide S receptor gene (NPSR1),
which have been shown to modulate responses to distal and acute stress experiences.
For instance, gene-environment interaction (GxE) studies have provided evidence
that both 5-HTT and NPSR1 interact with environmental stress, particularly
traumatic experiences during childhood, in the moderation of anxiety traits, and
both 5-HTT and NPSR1 have been implicated in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
(HPA) axis reactivity – an intermediate phenotype of mental disorders – in response
to acute stress exposure. The first part of this thesis aimed to address the interplay of
variations in both 5-HTT and NPSR1 genes and distal stress experiences, i.e.
childhood trauma, in the moderation of anxiety-related traits, extended by
investigation of the potentially protective effect of positive influences, i.e. elements of
successful coping such as general self-efficacy (GSE), on a GxE risk constellation by
introducing GSE as an indicator of coping ability (“C”) as an additional dimension in
a GxExC approach conferring – or buffering – vulnerability to anxiety. Increased
anxiety was observed in 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 LALA genotype and NSPR1 rs324981 AA
genotype carriers, respectively, with a history of childhood maltreatment but only in
the absence of a person’s ability to cope with adversity, whereas a dose-dependent
effect on anxiety traits as a function of maltreatment experiences irrespective of
coping characteristics was observed in the presence of at least one 5-HTT S/LG or
NSPR1 T allele, respectively. The second part of this thesis addressed the respective
impact of 5-HTT and NPSR1 variants on the neuroendocrine, i.e. salivary cortisol
response to acute psychosocial stress by applying the Maastricht Acute Stress Test
(MAST). A direct effect of NPSR1 – but not 5-HTT – on the modulation of acute
stress reactivity could be discerned, with carriers of the more active NPSR1 T allele
Summary
III
displaying significantly higher overall salivary cortisol levels in response to the MAST
compared to AA genotype carriers.
In summary, study 1 observed a moderating effect of GSE in interaction with
childhood maltreatment and 5-HTT and NPSR1, respectively, in an extended GxExC
model of anxiety risk, which may serve to inform targeted preventive interventions
mitigating GxE risk constellations and to improve therapeutic interventions by
strengthening coping ability as a protective mechanism to promote resilient
functioning. In study 2, a modulation of HPA axis function, considered to be an
endophenotype of stress-related mental disorders, by NPSR1 gene variation could be
discerned, suggesting neuroendocrine stress reactivity as an important potential
intermediate phenotype of anxiety given findings linking NPSR1 to dimensional and
categorical anxiety. Results from both studies may converge within the framework of
a multi-level model of anxiety risk, integrating neurobiological, neuroendocrine,
environmental, and psychological factors that act together in a highly complex
manner towards increasing or decreasing anxiety risk.
Renewal of fear is one form of relapse that occurs after successful therapy, resulting from an encounter with a feared object in a context different from the context of the exposure therapy. According to Bouton (1994), the return of fear, provoked by context change, indicates that the fear was not erased in the first place. More importantly, the return of fear indicates that during the exposure session a new association was learned that connected the feared object with “no fear”; yet, as Bouton further argues, this association is context dependent. Such dependence could explain effects like renewal. In a new context, the therapeutic association will not be expressed and thus will no longer inhibit the fear. The assumption that an association is context dependent has been tested and showed robust results (Balooch & Neumann, 2011; Siavash Bandarian Balooch, Neumann, & Boschen, 2012; Culver, Stoyanova, & Craske, 2011; Kim & Richardson, 2009; Neumann & Kitlertsirivatana, 2010). Research for the treatment of anxiety disorders, aiming to reduce fear and, more importantly, prevent relapse, is flourishing. There are several exposure protocols currently under investigation: multiple contexts exposure (MCE), which aims at reducing the return of fear due to renewal (e.g., Balooch & Neumann, 2011); prolonged exposure (PE), which aims at strengthening the inhibitory association during the extinction learning (e.g., Thomas, Vurbic, & Novak, 2009); and reconsolidation update (RU), which aims at “updating” the reconsolidation process by briefly exposing the CS+ before the actual extinction takes place (Schiller et al., 2010). So far, however, few clinical studies conducted on humans have investigated these novel treatment protocols, and as far as I know none has investigated the mechanisms of action behind these protocols with a human clinical sample. The present thesis has three main goals. The first is to demonstrate that exposure therapy in multiple contexts reduces the likelihood of renewal. The second is to examine the mechanisms contributing to the effect of MCE and the third is to shed light on the concept of context in the framework of the conditioning and extinction paradigm. To this end, three studies were conducted. The first study investigated the effect of MCE on renewal, the second and third studies examined working mechanisms of MCE. In the first study thirty spider-phobic participants were exposed four times to a virtual spider. The exposure trials were conducted either in one single context or in four different contexts. Finally, all participants completed both a virtual renewal test, with the virtual spider presented in a novel virtual context, and an in vivo behavioral avoidance test with a real spider. This study successfully demonstrated the efficacy of MCE on reducing renewal. Study 2 investigated the working mechanisms behind MCE by utilizing a differential conditioning paradigm and conducting the extinction in multiple contexts, targeting similar renewal attenuation as achieved in study 1. This was followed by two tests that attempted to reveal extinction-relevant associations like ones causing context inhibitory effects. This study had three main hypotheses: (1) The extinction context is associated with the exposure, and thus operates as a safety signal at some point during the extinction; it will therefore compete with the safety learning of the CS, leading to a decreased extinction effect on the CS if the extinction is conducted in only one context. (2) The elements (e.g., room color, furniture) of the extinction context are connected to the therapeutic association and therefore should serve as reminders of the extinction, causing a stronger fear inhibition when presented during a test. (3) Therapy process factors, according to emotional processing theory, determine the renewal effect (e.g., initial fear activation, and within-session and between-session activation are correlated with the strength of renewal). In this study, however, no differences between the groups at the renewal phase were observed, presumably because the extinction was too strong to enable a renewal of fear at the test phase conducted immediately following the extinction. This hence rendered the two inhibitory tests useless. Study 3 aimed at defining the concept of context in the conditioning and exposure framework. Study 3 utilized the phenomenon known as generalization decrement, whereby a conditioned response is reduced due to change in the environment. This allowed context similarity to be quantified. After an acquisition phase in one context, participants were tested in one of three contexts, two of which differed in only one dimension (configuration of objects vs. features). The third group was tested in the same context and served as control group. The goal was to show that both configuration and features play an important role in the definition of context. There was, however, no significant statistical difference between the groups at the test phases, likely because of context novelty effects (participants exposed to a new context following extinction in another context expected a second extinction phase, and thus demonstrated greater fear than expected in all three groups).