572 Biochemie
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
Language
- English (5)
Keywords
- Transkriptionsfaktor (5) (remove)
Ubiquitination is a posttranslational modification with immense impact on a wide range of cellular processes, including proteasomal degradation, membrane dynamics, transcription, translation, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair and immunity. These diverse functions stem from the various ubiquitin chain types, topologies, and attachment sites on substrate proteins. Substrate recruitment and modification on lysine, serine or threonine residues is catalyzed by ubiquitin ligases (E3s). An important E3 that decides about the fate of numerous substrates is the HECT-type ubiquitin ligase HUWE1. Depending on the substrate, HUWE1 is involved in different processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, DNA repair, and transcription. One of the transcription factors that is ubiquitinated by HUWE1 is the MYC interacting zinc finger protein 1 (MIZ1). MIZ1 is a BTB/POZ (Bric-à-brac, Tramtrack and Broad-Complex/Pox virus and zinc finger) zinc finger (ZF) protein that binds to DNA through its 13 C2H2-type zinc fingers and either activates or represses the transcription of target genes, including genes involved in cell cycle arrest, such as P21CIP1 (CDKN1A). The precise functions of MIZ1 depend on its interactions with the MYC-MAX heterodimer, but also its heterodimerization with other BTB-ZF proteins, such as BCL6 or NAC1. How MIZ1 interacts with HUWE1 has not been studied and, as a consequence, it has not been possible to rationally develop tools to manipulate this interaction with specificity in order to better understand the effects of the interaction on the transcriptional function of MIZ1 on target genes or processes downstream. One aspect of my research, therefore, aimed at characterizing the MIZ1-HUWE1 interaction at a structural level. I determined a crystal structure of the MIZ1-BTB-domain in complex with a peptide, referred to as ASC, derived from a C terminal region of HUWE1, previously named ‘activation segment’. The binding mode observed in this crystal structure could be validated by binding and activity assays in vitro and by cell-based co-IP experiments in the context of N-terminally truncated HUWE1 constructs. I was not able to provide unambiguous evidence for the identified binding mode in the context of full-length HUWE1, indicating that MIZ1 recognition by HUWE1 requires yet unknown regions in the cell. While the structural details of the MIZ1-HUWE1 interaction remains to be elucidated in the context of the full-length proteins, the binding mode between MIZ1BTB and ASC revealed an interesting, atypical structural feature of the BTB domain of MIZ1 that, to my knowledge, has not been described for other BTB-ZF proteins: The B3 region in MIZ1BTB is conformationally malleable, which allows for a HUWE1-ASC-peptide-mediated β-sheet extension of the upper B1/B2-strands, resulting in a mixed, 3 stranded β-sheet. Such β-sheet extension does not appear to occur in other homo- or heterodimeric BTB-ZF proteins, including MIZ1-heterodimers, since these proteins typically possess a pre-formed B3-strand in at least one subunit. Instead, BCL6 co repressor-derived peptides (SMRT and BCOR) were found to extend the lower β-sheet in BCL6BTB by binding to an adjacent ‘lateral groove’. This interaction follows a 1:1 stoichiometry, whereas the MIZ1BTB-ASC-complex shows a 2:1 stoichiometry. The crystal structure of the MIZ1BTB-ASC-complex I determined, along with comparative binding studies of ASC with monomeric, homodimeric, and heterodimeric MIZ1BTB variants, respectively, suggests that ASC selects for MIZ1BTB homodimers. The structural data I generated may serve as an entry point for the prediction of additional interaction partners of MIZ1 that also have the ability to extend the upper β-sheet of MIZ1BTB. If successful, such interaction partners and structures thereof might aid the design of peptidomimetics or small-molecule inhibitors of MIZ1 signaling. Proof-of-principle for such a structure-guided approach targeting BTB domains has been provided by small-molecule inhibitors of BCL6BTB co-repressors interactions. If a similar approach led to molecules that interfere with specific interactions of MIZ1, they would provide intriguing probes to study MIZ1 biology and may eventually allow for the development of MIZ1-directed cancer therapeutics.
Gene expression and transfer of the genetic information to the next generation forms the basis of cellular life. These processes crucially rely on DNA, thus the preservation, transcription and translation of DNA is of fundamental importance for any living being. The general transcription factor TFIIH is a ten subunit protein complex, which consists of two subcomplexes: XPB, p62, p52, p44, p34, and p8 constitute the TFIIH core, CDK7, CyclinH, and MAT1 constitute the CAK. These two subcomplexes are connected via XPD. TFIIH is a crucial factor involved in both, DNA repair and transcription. The central role of TFIIH is underlined by three severe disorders linked to failure of TFIIH in these processes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy. Only limited structural and functional data of TFIIH are available so far. Here, the model organism Chaetomium thermophilum was utilized with the aim to structurally and functionally characterize TFIIH. By combining the expression and purification of single TFIIH subunits with the co-expression and co-purification of dual complexes, a unique and powerful modular system of the TFIIH core subunits could be established, encompassing all proteins in high quality and fully functional. This system permits the step-wise assembly of TFIIH core, thereby making it possible to assess the influence of the intricate interaction network within TFIIH core on the overall enzymatic activities of TFIIH, which has not been possible so far. Utilizing the single subunits and dual complexes, a detailed interaction network of TFIIH core was established, revealing the crucial role of the p34 subunit as a central scaffold of TFIIH by linking the two proteins p44 and p52. Our studies also suggest that p62 constitutes the central interface of TFIIH to the environment rather than acting as a scaffold. TFIIH core complexes were assembled and investigated via electron microscopy. Preliminary data indicate that TFIIH adopts different conformational states, which are important to fulfill its functions in transcription and DNA repair. Additionally, a shortened construct of p62 was used to develop an easy-to-use, low cost strategy to overcome the crystallographic phase problem via cesium derivatization.
N-MYC is a member of the human MYC proto-oncogene family, which comprises three transcription factors (C-, N- and L-MYC) that function in multiple biological processes. Deregulated expression of MYC proteins is linked to tumour initiation, maintenance and progression. For example, a large fraction of neuroblastoma displays high N-MYC levels due to an amplification of the N-MYC encoding gene. MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma depend on high N-MYC protein levels, which are maintained by Aurora-A kinase. Aurora-A interaction with N-MYC interferes with degradation of N-MYC via the E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFFBXW7. However, the underlying mechanism of Aurora-A-mediated stabilisation of N-MYC remains to be elucidated.
To identify novel N-MYC interacting proteins, which could be involved in N-MYC stabilisation by Aurora-A, a proteomic analysis of purified N-MYC protein complexes was conducted. Since two alanine mutations in MBI of N-MYC, T58A and S62A (N-MYC mut), disable Aurora-A-mediated stabilisation of N-MYC, N-MYC protein complexes from cells expressing either N-MYC wt or mut were analysed. Proteomic analysis revealed that N-MYC interacts with two deubiquitinating enzymes, USP7 and USP11, which catalyse the removal of ubiquitin chains from target proteins, preventing recognition by the proteasome and subsequent degradation. Although N-MYC interaction with USP7 and USP11 was confirmed in subsequent immunoprecipitation experiments, neither USP7, nor USP11 was shown to be involved in the regulation of N-MYC stability. Besides USP7/11, proteomic analyses identified numerous additional N-MYC interacting proteins that were not described to interact with MYC transcription factors previously. Interestingly, many of the identified N-MYC interaction partners displayed a preference for the interaction with N-MYC wt, suggesting a MBI-dependent interaction. Among these were several proteins, which are involved in three-dimensional organisation of chromatin domains and transcriptional elongation by POL II. Not only the interaction of N-MYC with proteins functioning in elongation, such as the DSIF component SPT5 and the PAF1C components CDC73 and CTR9, was validated in immunoprecipitation experiments, but also with the POL III transcription factor TFIIIC and topoisomerases TOP2A/B. ChIP-sequencing analysis of N-MYC and TFIIIC subunit 5 (TFIIIC5) revealed a large number of joint binding sites in POL II promoters and intergenic regions, which are characterised by the presence of a specific motif that is highly similar to the CTCF motif. Additionally, N-MYC was shown to interact with the ring-shaped cohesin complex that is known to bind to CTCF motifs and to assist the insulator protein CTCF. Importantly, individual ChIP experiments demonstrated that N-MYC, TFIIIC5 and cohesin subunit RAD21 occupy joint binding sites comprising a CTCF motif.
Collectively, the results indicate that N-MYC functions in two biological processes that have not been linked to MYC biology previously. Furthermore, the identification of joint binding sites of N-MYC, TFIIIC and cohesin and the confirmation of their interaction with each other suggests a novel function of MYC transcription factors in three-dimensional organisation of chromatin.
Several important cellular processes, including transcription, nucleotide excision repair and cell cycle control are mediated by the multifaceted interplay of subunits within the general transcription factor II H (TFIIH).
A better understanding of the molecular structure of TFIIH is the key to unravel the mechanism of action of this versatile protein complex within these pathways. This becomes especially important in the context of severe diseases like xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy, that arise from single point mutations in some of the TFIIH subunits.
In an attempt to structurally characterize the TFIIH complex, we harnessed the qualities of the eukaryotic thermophile Chaetomium thermophilum, a remarkable fungus, which has only recently been recognized as a novel model organism. Homologues of TFIIH from C. thermophilum were expressed in E. coli, purified to homogeneity and subsequently utilized for crystallization trials and biochemical studies.
The results of the present work include the first crystal structure of the p34 subunit of TFIIH, comprising the N-terminal domain of the protein. The structure revealed a von Willebrand Factor A (vWA) like fold, which is generally known to be involved in a multitude of protein-protein interactions. Structural comparison allowed to delineate similarities as well as differences to already known vWA domains, providing insight into the role of p34 within TFIIH. These results indicate that p34 assumes the role of a structural scaffold for other TFIIH subunits via its vWA domain, while likely serving additional functions, which are mediated through its
C-terminal zinc binding domain and are so far unknown.
Within TFIIH p34 interacts strongly with the p44 subunit, a positive regulator of the XPD helicase, which is required for regulation of RNA Polymerase II mediated transcription and essential for eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair. Based on the p34 vWA structure putative protein-protein interfaces were analyzed and binding sites for the p34 p44 interaction suggested. Continuous crystallization efforts then led to the first structure of a p34 p44 minimal complex, comprising the N-terminal vWA domain of p34 and the C-terminal C4C4 RING domain of p44. The structure of the p34 p44 minimal complex verified the previous hypothesis regarding the involved binding sites. In addition, careful analysis of the complex interface allowed to identify critical residues, which were subsequently mutated and analyzed with respect to their significance in mediating the p34 p44 interaction, by analytical size exclusion chromatography, electrophoretic mobility shift assays and isothermal titration calorimetry. The structure of the p34 p44 complex also revealed a binding mode of the p44 C4C4 RING domain, which differed from that of other known RING domains in several aspects, supporting the hypothesis that p44 contains a novel variation of this domain.
The Notch signaling pathway is crucial for mammalian heart development. It controls cell-fate decisions, coordinates patterning processes and regulates proliferation and differentiation. Critical Notch effectors are Hey bHLH transcription factors (TF) that are expressed in atrial (Hey1) and ventricular (Hey2) cardiomyocytes (CM) and in the developing endocardium (Hey1/2/L). The importance of Hey proteins for cardiac development is demonstrated by knockout (KO) mice, which suffer from lethal cardiac defects, such as ventricular septum defects (VSD), valve defects and cardiomyopathy. Despite this clear functional relevance, little is known about Hey downstream targets in the heart and the molecular mechanism by which they are regulated.
Here, I use a cell culture system with inducible Hey1, Hey2 or HeyL expression to study Hey target gene regulation in HEK293 cells, in murine embryonic stem cells (ESC) and in ESC derived CM. In HEK293 cells, I could show that genome wide binding sites largely overlap between all three Hey proteins, but HeyL has many additional binding sites that are not bound by Hey1 or Hey2. Shared binding sites are located close to transcription start sites (TSS) where Hey proteins preferentially bind to canonical E boxes, although more loosely defined modes of binding exist. Additional sites only bound by HeyL are more scattered across the genome. The ability of HeyL to bind these sites depends on the C-terminal part of the protein. Although there are genes which are differently regulated by HeyL, it is unclear whether this regulation results from binding of additional sites by HeyL.
Additionally, Hey target gene regulation was studied in ESC and differentiated CM, which are more relevant for the observed cardiac phenotypes. ESC derived CM contract in culture and are positive for typical cardiac markers by qRT PCR and staining. According to these markers differentiation is unaffected by prolonged Hey1 or Hey2 overexpression. Regulated genes are largely redundant between Hey1 and Hey2. These are mainly other TF involved in e.g. developmental processes, apoptosis, cell migration and cell cycle. Many target genes are cell type specifically regulated causing a shift in Hey repression of genes involved in cell migration in ESC to repression of genes involved in cell cycle in CM.
The number of Hey binding sites is reduced in CM and HEK293 cells compared to ESC, most likely due to more regions of dense chromatin in differentiated cells. Binding sites are enriched at the proximal promoters of down-regulated genes, compared to up-or non-regulated genes. This indicates that up-regulation primarily results from indirect effects, while down-regulation is the direct results of Hey binding to target promoters. The extent of repression generally correlates with the amount of Hey binding and subsequent recruitment of histone deacetylases (Hdac) to target promoters resulting in histone H3 deacetylation.
However, in CM the repressive effect of Hey binding on a subset of genes can be annulled, likely due to binding of cardiac specific activators like Srf, Nkx2-5 and Gata4. These factors seem not to interfere with Hey binding in CM, but they recruit histone acetylases such as p300 that may counteract Hey mediated histone H3 deacetylation. Such a scenario explains differential regulation of Hey target genes between ESC and CM resulting in gene and cell-type specific regulation.