572 Biochemie
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (96)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (96)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (52)
- Journal article (39)
- Master Thesis (2)
- Preprint (2)
- Book article / Book chapter (1)
Keywords
- Transkriptionsfaktor (5)
- DNS-Reparatur (4)
- Ubiquitin (4)
- Regulation (3)
- SMN (3)
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3)
- TFIIH (3)
- Thrombozyt (3)
- gene expression (3)
- mass spectrometry (3)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (36)
- Lehrstuhl für Biochemie (32)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (22)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (14)
- Institut für Molekulare Infektionsbiologie (7)
- Institut für Experimentelle Biomedizin (4)
- Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie (3)
- Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie (3)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (3)
- Fakultät für Biologie (2)
Schriftenreihe
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
ResearcherID
Integrative "Omics"-Approach Discovers Dynamic and Regulatory Features of Bacterial Stress Responses
(2013)
Bacteria constantly face stress conditions and therefore mount specific responses to ensure adaptation and survival. Stress responses were believed to be predominantly regulated at the transcriptional level. In the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides the response to singlet oxygen is initiated by alternative sigma factors. Further adaptive mechanisms include post-transcriptional and post-translational events, which have to be considered to gain a deeper understanding of how sophisticated regulation networks operate. To address this issue, we integrated three layers of regulation: (1) total mRNA levels at different time-points revealed dynamics of the transcriptome, (2) mRNAs in polysome fractions reported on translational regulation (translatome), and (3) SILAC-based mass spectrometry was used to quantify protein abundances (proteome). The singlet oxygen stress response exhibited highly dynamic features regarding short-term effects and late adaptation, which could in part be assigned to the sigma factors RpoE and RpoH2 generating distinct expression kinetics of corresponding regulons. The occurrence of polar expression patterns of genes within stress-inducible operons pointed to an alternative of dynamic fine-tuning upon stress. In addition to transcriptional activation, we observed significant induction of genes at the post-transcriptional level (translatome), which identified new putative regulators and assigned genes of quorum sensing to the singlet oxygen stress response. Intriguingly, the SILAC approach explored the stress-dependent decline of photosynthetic proteins, but also identified 19 new open reading frames, which were partly validated by RNA-seq. We propose that comparative approaches as presented here will help to create multi-layered expression maps on the system level ("expressome"). Finally, intense mass spectrometry combined with RNA-seq might be the future tool of choice to re-annotate genomes in various organisms and will help to understand how they adapt to alternating conditions.
Although the DNA methyltransferase 2 family is highly conserved during evolution and recent reports suggested a dual specificity with stronger activity on transfer RNA (tRNA) than DNA substrates, the biological function is still obscure. We show that the Dictyostelium discoideum Dnmt2-homologue DnmA is an active tRNA methyltransferase that modifies C38 in \(tRNA^{Asp(GUC)}\) in vitro and in vivo. By an ultraviolet-crosslinking and immunoprecipitation approach, we identified further DnmA targets. This revealed specific tRNA fragments bound by the enzyme and identified \(tRNA^{Glu(CUC/UUC)}\) and \(tRNA^{Gly(GCC)}\) as new but weaker substrates for both human Dnmt2 and DnmA in vitro but apparently not in vivo. Dnmt2 enzymes form transient covalent complexes with their substrates. The dynamics of complex formation and complex resolution reflect methylation efficiency in vitro. Quantitative PCR analyses revealed alterations in dnmA expression during development, cell cycle and in response to temperature stress. However, dnmA expression only partially correlated with tRNA methylation in vivo. Strikingly, dnmA expression in the laboratory strain AX2 was significantly lower than in the NC4 parent strain. As expression levels and binding of DnmA to a target in vivo are apparently not necessarily accompanied by methylation, we propose an additional biological function of DnmA apart from methylation.
Pigment cells and neuronal cells both are derived from the neural crest. Here, we describe the Pit-Oct-Unc (POU) domain transcription factor Brn3a, normally involved in neuronal development, to be frequently expressed in melanoma, but not in melanocytes and nevi. RNAi-mediated silencing of Brn3a strongly reduced the viability of melanoma cell lines and decreased tumour growth in vivo. In melanoma cell lines, inhibition of Brn3a caused DNA double-strand breaks as evidenced by Mre11/Rad50-containing nuclear foci. Activated DNA damage signalling caused stabilization of the tumour suppressor p53, which resulted in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. When Brn3a was ectopically expressed in primary melanocytes and fibroblasts, anchorage-independent growth was increased. In tumourigenic melanocytes and fibroblasts, Brn3a accelerated tumour growth in vivo. Furthermore, Brn3a cooperated with proliferation pathways such as oncogenic BRAF, by reducing oncogene-induced senescence in non-malignant melanocytes. Together, these results identify Brn3a as a new factor in melanoma that is essential for melanoma cell survival and that promotes melanocytic transformation and tumourigenesis.
Plant hormones involving salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (Et), and auxin, gibberellins, and abscisic acid (ABA) are known to regulate host immune responses. However, plant hormone cytokinin has the potential to modulate defense signaling including SA and JA. It promotes plant pathogen and herbivore resistance; underlying mechanisms are still unknown. Using systems biology approaches, we unravel hub points of immune interaction mediated by cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis. High-confidence Arabidopsis protein-protein interactions (PPI) are coupled to changes in cytokinin-mediated gene expression. Nodes of the cellular interactome that are enriched in immune functions also reconstitute sub-networks. Topological analyses and their specific immunological relevance lead to the identification of functional hubs in cellular interactome. We discuss our identified immune hubs in light of an emerging model of cytokinin-mediated immune defense against pathogen infection in plants.
The Hey protein family, comprising Hey1, Hey2 and HeyL in mammals, conveys Notch signals in many cell types. The helix-loop-helix (HLH) domain as well as the Orange domain, mediate homo- and heterodimerization of these transcription factors. Although distinct interaction partners have been identified so far, their physiological relevance for Hey functions is still largely unclear. Using a tandem affinity purification approach and mass spectrometry analysis we identified members of an ubiquitin E3-ligase complex consisting of FBXO45, PAM and SKP1 as novel Hey1 associated proteins. There is a direct interaction between Hey1 and FBXO45, whereas FBXO45 is needed to mediate indirect Hey1 binding to SKP1. Expression of Hey1 induces translocation of FBXO45 and PAM into the nucleus. Hey1 is a short-lived protein that is degraded by the proteasome, but there is no evidence for FBXO45-dependent ubiquitination of Hey1. On the contrary, Hey1 mediated nuclear translocation of FBXO45 and its associated ubiquitin ligase complex may extend its spectrum to additional nuclear targets triggering their ubiquitination. This suggests a novel mechanism of action for Hey bHLH factors.
Escherichia coli α-hemolysin (HlyA) is a pore-forming protein of 110 kDa belonging to the family of RTX toxins. A hydrophobic region between the amino acid residues 238 and 410 in the N-terminal half of HlyA has previously been suggested to form hydrophobic and/or amphipathic α-helices and has been shown to be important for hemolytic activity and pore formation in biological and artificial membranes. The structure of the HlyA transmembrane channel is, however, largely unknown. For further investigation of the channel structure, we deleted in HlyA different stretches of amino acids that could form amphipathic β-strands according to secondary structure predictions (residues 71–110, 158–167, 180–203, and 264–286). These deletions resulted in HlyA mutants with strongly reduced hemolytic activity. Lipid bilayer measurements demonstrated that HlyAΔ71–110 and HlyAΔ264–286 formed channels with much smaller single-channel conductance than wildtype HlyA, whereas their channel-forming activity was virtually as high as that of the wildtype toxin. HlyAΔ158–167 and HlyAΔ180–203 were unable to form defined channels in lipid bilayers. Calculations based on the single-channel data indicated that the channels generated by HlyAΔ71–110 and HlyAΔ264–286 had a smaller size (diameter about 1.4 to 1.8 nm) than wildtype HlyA channels (diameter about 2.0 to 2.6 nm), suggesting that in these mutants part of the channel-forming domain was removed. Osmotic protection experiments with erythrocytes confirmed that HlyA, HlyAΔ71–110, and HlyAΔ264–286 form defined transmembrane pores and suggested channel diameters that largely agreed with those estimated from the single-channel data. Taken together, these results suggest that the channel-forming domain of HlyA might contain β-strands, possibly in addition to α-helical structures.
The Notch signaling pathway is crucial for mammalian heart development. It controls cell-fate decisions, coordinates patterning processes and regulates proliferation and differentiation. Critical Notch effectors are Hey bHLH transcription factors (TF) that are expressed in atrial (Hey1) and ventricular (Hey2) cardiomyocytes (CM) and in the developing endocardium (Hey1/2/L). The importance of Hey proteins for cardiac development is demonstrated by knockout (KO) mice, which suffer from lethal cardiac defects, such as ventricular septum defects (VSD), valve defects and cardiomyopathy. Despite this clear functional relevance, little is known about Hey downstream targets in the heart and the molecular mechanism by which they are regulated.
Here, I use a cell culture system with inducible Hey1, Hey2 or HeyL expression to study Hey target gene regulation in HEK293 cells, in murine embryonic stem cells (ESC) and in ESC derived CM. In HEK293 cells, I could show that genome wide binding sites largely overlap between all three Hey proteins, but HeyL has many additional binding sites that are not bound by Hey1 or Hey2. Shared binding sites are located close to transcription start sites (TSS) where Hey proteins preferentially bind to canonical E boxes, although more loosely defined modes of binding exist. Additional sites only bound by HeyL are more scattered across the genome. The ability of HeyL to bind these sites depends on the C-terminal part of the protein. Although there are genes which are differently regulated by HeyL, it is unclear whether this regulation results from binding of additional sites by HeyL.
Additionally, Hey target gene regulation was studied in ESC and differentiated CM, which are more relevant for the observed cardiac phenotypes. ESC derived CM contract in culture and are positive for typical cardiac markers by qRT PCR and staining. According to these markers differentiation is unaffected by prolonged Hey1 or Hey2 overexpression. Regulated genes are largely redundant between Hey1 and Hey2. These are mainly other TF involved in e.g. developmental processes, apoptosis, cell migration and cell cycle. Many target genes are cell type specifically regulated causing a shift in Hey repression of genes involved in cell migration in ESC to repression of genes involved in cell cycle in CM.
The number of Hey binding sites is reduced in CM and HEK293 cells compared to ESC, most likely due to more regions of dense chromatin in differentiated cells. Binding sites are enriched at the proximal promoters of down-regulated genes, compared to up-or non-regulated genes. This indicates that up-regulation primarily results from indirect effects, while down-regulation is the direct results of Hey binding to target promoters. The extent of repression generally correlates with the amount of Hey binding and subsequent recruitment of histone deacetylases (Hdac) to target promoters resulting in histone H3 deacetylation.
However, in CM the repressive effect of Hey binding on a subset of genes can be annulled, likely due to binding of cardiac specific activators like Srf, Nkx2-5 and Gata4. These factors seem not to interfere with Hey binding in CM, but they recruit histone acetylases such as p300 that may counteract Hey mediated histone H3 deacetylation. Such a scenario explains differential regulation of Hey target genes between ESC and CM resulting in gene and cell-type specific regulation.
Durch die Spleißreaktion werden nicht-kodierende Sequenzelemente (Introns) aus eukaryotischen Vorläufer-mRNAs entfernt und die kodierenden Sequenzelemente (Exons) miteinander zu einem offenen Leserahmen verbunden. Dieser zentrale Prozessierungsschritt während der eukaryotischen Genexpression wird durch das Spleißosom katalysiert, das aus den vier kleinen nukleären Ribonucleoproteinpartikeln (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4/U6 und U5, sowie einer Vielzahl weiterer Proteinfaktoren gebildet wird. Alle snRNPs besitzen eine gemeinsame ringförmige Kernstruktur, die aus sieben gemeinsamen Sm-Proteinen (SmB/B‘-D1-D2-D3-E-F-G) besteht, die ein einzelsträngiges Sequenzmotiv auf der snRNAs binden. Während sich diese, als Sm-Core-Domäne bezeichnete Struktur in vitro spontan ausbilden kann, erfolgt die Zusammenlagerung in vivo in einem assistierten und hochregulierten Prozess. Dieser ist abhängig von insgesamt mindestens 12 trans-agierenden Faktoren, die in den PRMT5- und SMN-Komplexen organisiert sind. Der PRMT5-Komplex agiert in der frühen Phase der Zusammenlagerung, indem er die Sm-Proteine durch die Untereinheit pICln rekrutiert und die symmetrische Methylierung von Argininresten in den C terminalen Schwänzen von SmB/B‘, SmD1 und SmD3 katalysiert.
Als Resultat dieser frühen Phase befinden sich die Sm-Proteine SmD1-D2-E-F-G und SmB/B‘-D3 in zwei getrennten und durch pICln organisierten Komplexen. Während SmB/B‘-D3-pICln am PRMT5-Komplex gebunden bleibt, existiert der zweite Komplex als freies Intermediat mit einem Sedimentationskoeffizienten von 6S. Diese Intermediate können nicht mit RNA assoziieren, sodass für die Fortsetzung des Zusammenlagerungsprozesses die Interaktion der Sm-Proteine mit pICln aufgelöst werden muss. Dies geschieht in der späten Phase der Sm-Core-Zusammenlagerung, in der die Sm-Proteine vom SMN-Komplex (bestehend aus SMN, Gemin2-8 und unrip) übernommen werden und pICln dissoziiert wird. Dadurch werden die Sm-Proteine für ihre Interaktion mit der snRNA aktiviert und können auf die Sm-Bindestelle transferiert werden, wodurch die Formierung des Sm-Core abgeschlossen wird.
Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit konnten mit Hilfe einer Kombination röntgenkristallographischer und elektronenmikroskopischer Methoden zwei wichtige Intermediate dieses Zusammenlagerungs-prozesses strukturbiologisch charakterisiert werden. Bei diesen Intermediaten handelt es sich um den 6S-Komplex, sowie um ein Sm-Protein-Transferintermediat mit einem Sedimentations-koeffizienten von 8S. In diesem ist der 6S-Komplex an zwei zentrale Untereinheiten des SMN-Komplexes (SMN und Gemin2) gebunden, während pICln den Komplex noch nicht verlassen hat. Der 8S-Komplex stellt daher ein „gefangenes“ Intermediat zwischen der frühen und späten Phase der Zusammenlagerung dar.
Zunächst gelang es eine erste Kristallform des rekombinant hergestellten 8S-Komplexes zu erhalten, die jedoch keine Strukturlösung erlaubte. Durch eine kombinierte Optimierung der Kristallisationsbedingung und der verwendeten Proteine wurde eine weitere ähnliche Kristallform erhalten, mit der die Kristallstruktur des 8S-Komplexes gelöst werden konnte. Die Kristallisation des 6S-Komplexes gelang im Anschluss auf Basis der Hypothese, dass Kristalle beider Komplexe aufgrund der kompositionellen Verwandtschaft zwischen 6S und 8S auch Ähnlichkeiten in der Architektur ihrer Kristallgitter aufweisen könnten. Daher wurden innerhalb von pICln gezielt Aminosäuren substituiert, die sich innerhalb von Kristallkontakten der 8S-Kristalle befanden und konformationell eingeschränkt waren. Mit entsprechend rekonstituierten 6S-Präparationen konnten dann zwei Kristallformen erzeugt werden, die eine Strukturlösung des 6S-Komplexes ermöglichten.
Durch die Kristallstruktur des 6S-Komplexes konnte für pICln eine strukturelle Mimikry der Sm-Proteine identifiziert werden. Diese ermöglicht eine Bindung der Sm-Proteine und eine frühzeitige topologische Organisation des Sm-Pentamers D1-D2-F-E-G in einer geschlossenen hexameren Ringstruktur. Die Kristallstruktur des 8S-Komplexes zeigt, wie der SMN-Komplex über Gemin2 an das Sm-Pentamer bindet. In Kombination mit einer EM-Struktur des 8S-Komplexes gelang es weiterhin, einen plausiblen Mechanismus für die Elimination von pICln und die Aktivierung der Sm-Proteine für die snRNA-Bindung zu formulieren. Somit konnten diese Arbeiten zu einem besseren Verständnis der Funktionen von trans-agierenden Faktoren bei Zusammenlagerung von RNA-Protein-Komplexen in vivo beitragen.
In mammals, KSR1 functions as an essential scaffold that coordinates the assembly of RAF/MEK/ERK complexes and regulates intracellular signal transduction upon extracellular stimulation. Aberrant activation of the equivalent MAPK signaling pathway has been implicated in multiple human cancers and some developmental disorders. The mechanism of KSR1 regulation is highly complex and involves several phosphorylation/dephosphorylation steps. In the present study, a number of novel in vivo phosphorylation sites were detected in mKSR1 by use of mass spectrometry analysis. Among others, Tyr728 was identified as a unique regulatory residue phosphorylated by LCK, a Src kinase family member. To understand how phosphorylation of Tyr728 may regulate the function of KSR1 in signal transduction and cellular processes, structural modeling and biochemical studies were integrated in this work.
Computational modeling of the mKSR1(KD) protein structure revealed strong hydrogen bonding between phospho-Tyr728 and the residues surrounding Arg649. Remarkably, this pattern was altered when Tyr728 was non-phosphorylated or substituted. As confirmed by biochemical analysis, Arg649 may serve as a major anchor point for phospho-Tyr728 in order to stabilize internal structures of KSR1. In line with the protein modeling results, mutational studies revealed that substitution of Tyr728 by phenylalanine leads to a less compact interaction between KSR1 and MEK, a facilitated KSR1/B-RAF binding and an increased phosphorylation of MEK in complex with KSR1. From these findings it can be concluded that phospho-Tyr728 is involved in tightening the KSR1/MEK interaction interface and in regulating the phosphorylation of KSR1-bound MEK by either RAF or KSR1 kinases.
Beside the Tyr728, Ser722 was identified as a novel regulatory phosphorylation site. Amino acid exchanges at the relevant position demonstrated that Ser722 regulates KSR1-bound MEK phosphorylation without affecting KSR1/MEK binding per se. Due to its localization, Ser722 might consequently control the catalytic activity of KSR1 by interfering with the access of substrate (possibly MEK) to the active site of KSR1 kinase. Together with Ser722, phosphorylated Tyr728 may further positively affect the kinase activity of KSR1 as a consequence of its vicinity to the activation and catalytic loop in the KSR1(KD). As revealed by structural modeling, phospho-Tyr728 builds a hydrogen bond with the highly conserved Lys685. Consequently, phospho-Tyr728 has a stabilizing effect on internal structures involved in the catalytic reaction and possibly enhances the phosphate transfer within the catalytic cleft in KSR1. Considering these facts, it seems very likely that the LCK-dependent phosphorylation of Tyr728 plays a crucial role in the regulation of KSR1 catalytic activity.
Results of fractionation and morphology analyses revealed that KSR1 recruits LCK to cytoskeleton for its phosphorylation at Tyr728 suggesting that this residue may regulate cytoskeleton dynamics and, consequently, cell motility. Beside that, phosphorylation of Tyr728 is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, as shown by a significantly reduced population doubling time of KSR1-Y728F cells compared to cells expressing wild type KSR1.
Taken together, tyrosine phosphorylation in KSR1 uncovers a new link between Src family kinases and MAPK signaling. Tyr728, the novel regulatory phosphorylation site in murine KSR1, may coordinate the transition between the scaffolding and the catalytic function of KSR1 serving as a control point used to fine-tune cellular responses.
Using viruses to treat cancer is a novel approach to an age-old disease. Oncolytic viruses are native or recombinant viruses that have the innate or enhanced capability to infect tumour cells, replicate within the tumour microenvironment and subsequently lyse those cells. One representative, the vaccinia virus (VACV), belongs to the orthopoxvirus genus of the Poxviridae family. GLV-1h68, a recombinant and attenuated vaccinia virus devel- oped by the Genelux Corporation, is a member of this family currently being tested in various phase I/II clinical trials under the name GL-ONC1. It has been shown to specif- ically replicate in tumour cells while sparing healthy tissue and to metabolise prodrug at or transport immunological payloads to the site of affliction. Since imaging modalities offer little insight into viral replication deep within the body, and because oncolytic virotherapy is dependent on replication within the target tissue, the need for a monitoring system is evident. Pharmacokinetic analysis of this oncolytic agent was to give insight into the dynamics present in tumours during treatment. This, in turn, would give clinicians the opportunity to monitor the efficacy as early as possible after the onset of treatment, to observe treatment progression and possibly to gauge prognosis, without resorting to invasive procedures, e.g. biopsies. A criteria for viable biomarkers was that it had to be directly dependent on viral replica- tion. Ideally, a marker for treatment efficacy would be specific to the treatment modality, not necessarily the treatment type. Such a marker would be highly detectable (high sen- sitivity), specific for the treatment (high specificity), and present in an easily obtained specimen (blood). Taking this into consideration, the biomarkers were chosen for their potential to be indicators of viral replication. Thus, the biomarkers analysed in this thesis are: the native proteins expressed by the viral genes A27L and B5R, the virally encoded recombinant proteins β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, green fluorescent protein (GFP), carboxypeptidase G2 (CPG2) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Each marker is under the control of one of five different promoters present. All recombinant viruses used in this thesis express A27L, B5R, GFP and β-glucuronidase and all are derived from the parental virus GLV-1h68. In addition to these markers, GLV-1h68 expresses β-galactosidase; GLV-1h181 expresses CPG2. [...]