590 Tiere (Zoologie)
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Year of publication
- 2023 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
Language
- English (4)
Keywords
- Biene (3)
- division of labor (2)
- honeybee (2)
- AmGr1, AmGr2, AmGr3 (1)
- Apis mellifera (1)
- CRISPR/Cas9 (1)
- Danaus plexippus (1)
- Gehirn (1)
- Monarchfalter (1)
- Orientierung (1)
Honeybees are among the few animals that rely on eusociality to survive. While the
task of queen and drones is only reproduction, all other tasks are accomplished by sterile
female worker bees. Different tasks are mostly divided by worker bees of different ages
(temporal polyethism). Young honeybees perform tasks inside the hive like cleaning and
nursing. Older honeybees work at the periphery of the nest and fulfill tasks like guarding
the hive entrance. The oldest honeybees eventually leave the hive to forage for resources
until they die. However, uncontrollable circumstances might force the colony to adapt or
perish. For example, the introduced Varroa destructor mite or the deformed wing virus
might erase a lot of in-hive bees. On the other hand, environmental events might kill a
lot of foragers, leaving the colony with no new food intake. Therefore, adaptability of
task allocation must be a priority for a honeybee colony.
In my dissertation, I employed a wide range of behavioral, molecular biological and analytical techniques to unravel the underlying molecular and physiological mechanisms of
the honeybee division of labor, especially in conjunction with honeybee malnourishment.
The genes AmOARα1, AmTAR1, Amfor and vitellogenin have long been implied to
be important for the transition from in-hive tasks to foraging. I have studied in detail
expression of all of these genes during the transition from nursing to foraging to understand how their expression patterns change during this important phase of life. My focus
lay on gene expression in the honeybee brain and fat body. I found an increase in the
AmOARα1 and the Amforα mRNA expression with the transition from in-hive tasks to
foraging and a decrease in expression of the other genes in both tissues. Interestingly,
I found the opposite pattern of the AmOARα1 and AmTAR1 mRNA expression in the
honeybee fat body during orientation flights. Furthermore, I closely observed juvenile
hormone titers and triglyceride levels during this crucial time. Juvenile hormone titers
increased with the transition from in-hive tasks to foraging and triglyceride levels decreased.
Furthermore, in-hive bees and foragers also differ on a behavioral and physiological level.
For example, foragers are more responsive towards light and sucrose. I proposed that
modulation via biogenic amines, especially via octopamine and tyramine, can increase
or decrease the responsiveness of honeybees. For that purpose, in-hive bees and foragers were injected with both biogenic amines and the receptor response was quantified
1
using electroretinography. In addition, I studied the behavioral response of the bees to
light using a phototaxis assay. Injecting octopamine increased the receptor response and
tyramine decreased it. Also, both groups of honeybees showed an increased phototactic
response when injected with octopamine and a decreased response when injected with
tyramine, independent of locomotion.
Additionally, nutrition has long been implied to be a driver for division of labor. Undernourished honeybees are known to speed up their transition to foragers, possibly to
cope with the missing resources. Furthermore, larval undernourishment has also been
implied to speed up the transition from in-hive bees to foragers, due to increasing levels
of juvenile hormone titers in adult honeybees after larval starvation. Therefore, I reared
honeybees in-vitro to compare the hatched adult bees of starved and overfed larvae to
bees reared under the standard in-vitro rearing diet. However, first I had to investigate
whether the in-vitro rearing method affects adult honeybees.
I showed effects of in-vitro rearing on behavior, with in-vitro reared honeybees foraging
earlier and for a shorter time than hive reared honeybees. Yet, nursing behavior was
unaffected.
Afterwards, I investigated the effects of different larval diets on adult honeybee workers.
I found no effects of malnourishment on behavioral or physiological factors besides a
difference in weight. Honeybee weight increased with increasing amounts of larval food,
but the effect seemed to vanish after a week.
These results show the complexity and adaptability of the honeybee division of labor.
They show the importance of the biogenic amines octopamine and tyramine and of the
corresponding receptors AmOARα1 and AmTAR1 in modulating the transition from inhive bees to foragers. Furthermore, they show that in-vitro rearing has no effects on
nursing behavior, but that it speeds up the transition from nursing to foraging, showing
strong similarities to effects of larval pollen undernourishment. However, larval malnourishment showed almost no effects on honeybee task allocation or physiology. It seems
that larval malnourishment can be easily compensated during the early lifetime of adult
honeybees.
The original habitat of native European honey bees (\(Apis\) \(mellifera\)) is forest, but currently there is a lack of data about the occurrence of wild honey bee populations in Europe. Prior to being kept by humans in hives, honey bees nested as wild species in hollow trees in temperate forests. However, in the 20th century, intensification of silviculture and agriculture with accompanying losses of nesting sites and depletion of food resources caused population declines in Europe. When the varroa mite (Varroa destructor), an invasive ectoparasite from Asia, was introduced in the late 1970s, wild honey bees were thought to be eradicated in Europe. Nevertheless, sporadic, mostly anecdotal, reports from ornithologists or forest ecologists indicated that honey bee colonies still occupy European forest areas. In my thesis I hypothesize that near-natural deciduous forests may provide sufficient large networks of nesting sites representing refugia for wild-living honey bees. Using two special search techniques, i.e. the tracking of flight routes of honey bee foragers (the “beelining” method) and the inspection of known cavity trees, I collected for the first time data on the occurrence and density of wild-living honey bees in forest areas in Germany (CHAPTER 3). I found wild-living honey bee colonies in the Hainich national park at low densities in two succeeding years. In another forest region, I checked known habitat trees containing black woodpecker cavities for occupation by wild-living honey bee colonies. It turned out that honey bees regularly use these cavities and occur in similar densities in both studied forest regions, independent of the applied detection method. Extrapolating these densities to all German forest areas, I estimate several thousand wild-living colonies in Germany that potentially interact in different ways with the forest environment. I conclude that honey bees regularly colonize forest areas in Germany and that networks of mapped woodpecker cavities offer unique possibilities to study the ecology of wild-living honey bees over several years.
While their population status is ambiguous and the density of colonies low, the fact that honey bees can still be found in forests poses questions about food supply in forest environments. Consequently, I investigated the suitability of woodlands as a honey bee foraging habitat (CHAPTER 4). As their native habitat, forests are assumed to provide important pollen and nectar sources for honey bee colonies. However, resource supply might be spatially and temporally restricted and landscape-scale studies in European forest regions are lacking. Therefore, I set up twelve honey bee colonies in observation hives at locations with varying degree of forest cover. Capitalizing on the unique communication behaviour, the waggle dance, I examined the foraging distances and habitat preferences of honey bees over almost an entire foraging season. Moreover, by connecting this decoded dance information with colony weight recordings, I could draw conclusions about the contribution of the different habitat types to honey yield. Foraging distances generally increased with the amount of forest in the surrounding landscape. Yet, forest cover did not have an effect on colony weight. Compared to expectations based on the proportions of different habitats in the surroundings, colonies foraged more frequently in cropland and grasslands than in deciduous and coniferous forests, especially in late summer when pollen foraging in the forest is most difficult. In contrast, colonies used forests for nectar/honeydew foraging in early summer during times of colony weight gain emphasizing forests as a temporarily significant source of carbohydrates. Importantly, my study shows that the ecological and economic value of managed forest as habitat for honey bees and other wild pollinators can be significantly increased by the continuous provision of floral resources, especially for pollen foraging.
The density of these wild-living honey bee colonies and their survival is driven by several factors that vary locally, making it crucial to compare results in different regions. Therefore, I investigated a wild-living honey bee population in Galicia in north-western Spain, where colonies were observed to reside in hollow electric poles (CHAPTER 5). The observed colony density only in these poles was almost twice as high as in German forest areas, suggesting generally more suitable resource conditions for the bees in Galicia. Based on morphometric analyses of their wing venation patterns, I assigned the colonies to the native evolutionary lineage (M-lineage) where the particularly threatened subspecies \(Apis\) \(mellifera\) \(iberiensis\) also belongs to. Averaged over two consecutive years, almost half of the colonies survived winter (23 out of 52). Interestingly, semi-natural areas both increased abundance and subsequent colony survival. Colonies surrounded by more semi-natural habitat (and therefore less intensive cropland) had an elevated overwintering probability, indicating that colonies need a certain amount of semi-natural habitat in the landscape to survive. Due to their ease of access these power poles in Galicia are, ideally suited to assess the population demography of wild-living Galician honey bee colonies through a long-term monitoring.
In a nutshell, my thesis indicates that honey bees in Europe always existed in the wild. I performed the first survey of wild-living bee density yet done in Germany and Spain. My thesis identifies the landscape as a major factor that compromises winter survival and reports the first data on overwintering rates of wild-living honey bees in Europe. Besides, I established methods to efficiently detect wild-living honey bees in different habitat. While colonies can be found all over Europe, their survival and viability depend on unpolluted, flower rich habitats. The protection of near-natural habitat and of nesting sites is of paramount importance for the conservation of wild-living honey bees in Europe.
Monarch butterflies are famous for their annual long-distance migration. Decreasing temperatures and reduced daylight induce the migratory state in the autumn generation of monarch butterflies. Not only are they in a reproductive diapause, they also produce fat deposits to be prepared for the upcoming journey: Driven by their instinct to migrate, they depart from their eclosion grounds in the northern regions of the North American continent and start their southern journey to their hibernation spots in Central Mexico. The butterflies cover a distance of up to 4000 km across the United States. In the next spring, the same butterflies invert their preferred heading direction due to seasonal changes and start their northward spring migration. The spring migration is continued by three consecutive butterfly generations, until the animals repopulate the northern regions in North America as non-migratory monarch butterflies. The monarch butterflies’ migratory state is genetically and epigenetically regulated, including the directed flight behavior. Therefore, the insect’s internal compass system does not only have to encode the butterflies preferred, but also its current heading direction. However, the butterfly’s internal heading representation has to be matched to external cues, to avoid departing from its initial flight path and increasing its risk of missing its desired destination. During the migratory flight, visual cues provide the butterflies with reliable orientation information. The butterflies refer to the sun as their main orientation cue. In addition to the sun, the butterflies likely use the polarization pattern of the sky for orientation. The sky compass signals are processed within a region in the brain, termed the central complex (CX). Previous research on the CX neural circuitry of the monarch butterflies demonstrated that tangential central complex neurons (TL) carry the visual input information into the CX and respond to a simulated sun and polarized light. However, whether these cells process additional visual cues like the panoramic skyline is still unknown. Furthermore, little is known about how the migratory state affects visual cue processing. In addition to this, most experiments studying the monarch butterfly CX focused on how neurons process single visual cues. However, how combined visual stimuli are processed in the CX is still unknown.
This thesis is investigating the following questions:
1) How does the migratory state affect visual cue processing in the TL cells within the monarch butterfly brain?
2) How are multiple visual cues integrated in the TL cells?
3) How is compass information modulated in the CX?
To study these questions, TL neurons from both animal groups (migratory and non-migratory) were electrophysiologically characterized using intracellular recordings while presenting different simulated celestial cues and visual sceneries. I showed that the TL neurons of migratory butterflies are more narrowly tuned to the sun, possibly helping them in keeping a directed flight course during migration. Furthermore, I found that TL cells encode a panoramic skyline, suggesting that the CX network combines celestial and terrestrial information. Experiments with combined celestial stimuli revealed that the TL cells combine both cue information linearly. However, if exposing the animals to a simulated visual scenery containing a panoramic skyline and a simulated sun, the single visual cues are weighted differently. These results indicate that the CX’s input region can flexibly adapt to different visual cue conditions. Furthermore, I characterize a previously unknown neuron in the monarch butterfly CX which responds to celestial stimuli and connects the CX with other brain neuropiles. How this cell type affects heading direction encoding has yet to be determined.
In the eusocial insect honeybee (Apis mellifera), many sterile worker bees live together with a reproductive queen in a colony. All tasks of the colony are performed by the workers, undergoing age-dependent division of labor. Beginning as hive bees, they take on tasks inside the hive such as cleaning or the producing of larval food, later developing into foragers. With that, the perception of sweetness plays a crucial role for all honeybees whether they are sitting on the honey stores in the hive or foraging for food. Their ability to sense sweetness is undoubtedly necessary to develop and evaluate food sources. Many of the behavioral decisions in honeybees are based on sugar perception, either on an individual level for ingestion, or for social behavior such as the impulse to collect or process nectar. In this context, honeybees show a complex spectrum of abilities to perceive sweetness on many levels. They are able to perceive at least seven types of sugars and decide to collect them for the colony. Further, they seem to distinguish between these sugars or at least show clear preferences when collecting them. Additionally, the perception of sugar is not rigid in honeybees. For instance, their responsiveness towards sugar changes during the transition from in-hive bees (e.g. nurses) to foraging and is linked to the division of labor. Other direct or immediate factors changing responsiveness to sugars are stress, starvation or underlying factors, such as genotype.
Interestingly, the complexity in their sugar perception is in stark contrast to the fact that honeybees seem to have only three predicted sugar receptors.
In this work, we were able to characterize the three known sugar receptors (AmGr1, AmGr2 and AmGr3) of the honeybee fully and comprehensively in oocytes (Manuscript II, Chapter 3 and Manuscript III, Chapter 4). We could show that AmGr1 is a broad sugar receptor reacting to sucrose, glucose, maltose, melezitose and trehalose (which is the honeybees’ main blood sugar), but not fructose. AmGr2 acts as its co-receptor altering AmGr1’s specificity, AmGr3 is a specific fructose receptor and we proved the heterodimerization of all receptors. With my studies, I was able to reproduce and compare the ligand specificity of the sugar receptors in vivo by generating receptor mutants with CRISPR/Cas9. With this thesis, I was able to define AmGr1 and AmGr3 as the honeybees’ basis receptors already capable to detect all sugars of its known taste spectrum.
In the expression analysis of my doctoral thesis (Manuscript I, Chapter 2) I demonstrated that both basis receptors are expressed in the antennae and the brain of nurse bees and foragers. This thesis assumes that AmGr3 (like the Drosophila homologue) functions as a sensor for fructose, which might be the satiety signal, while AmGr1 can sense trehalose as the main blood sugar in the brain. Both receptors show a reduced expression in the brain of foragers when compared with nurse bees. These results may reflect the higher concentrated diet of nurse bees in the hive. The higher number of receptors in the brain may allow nurse bees to perceive hunger earlier and to consume the food their sitting on. Forager bees have to be more persistent to hunger, when they are foraging, and food is not so accessible. The findings of reduced expression of the fructose receptor AmGr3 in the antennae of nurse bees are congruent with my other result that nurse bees are also less responsive to fructose at the antennae when compared to foragers (Manuscript I, Chapter 2). This is possible, since nurse bees sit more likely on ripe honey which contains not only higher levels of sugars but also monosaccharides (such as fructose), while foragers have to evaluate less-concentrated nectar.
My investigations of the expression of AmGr1 in the antennae of honeybees found no differences between nurse bees and foragers, although foragers are more responsive to the respective sugar sucrose (Manuscript I, Chapter 2). Considering my finding that AmGr2 is the co-receptor of AmGr1, it can be assumed that AmGr1 and the mediated sucrose taste might not be directly controlled by its expression, but indirectly by its co-receptor. My thesis therefore clearly shows that sugar perception is associated with division of labor in honeybees and appears to be directly or indirectly regulated via expression.
The comparison with a characterization study using other bee breeds and thus an alternative protein sequence of AmGr1 shows that co-expression of different AmGr1 versions with AmGr2 alters the sugar response differently. Therefore, this thesis provides first important indications that alternative splicing could also represent an important regulatory mechanism for sugar perception in honeybees.
Further, I found out that the bitter compound quinine lowers the reward quality in learning experiments for honeybees (Manuscript IV, Chapter 5). So far, no bitter receptor has been found in the genome of honeybees and this thesis strongly assumes that bitter substances such as quinine inhibit sugar receptors in honeybees. With this finding, my work includes other molecules as possible regulatory mechanism in the honeybee sugar perception as well. We showed that the inhibitory effect is lower for fructose compared to sucrose. Considering that sugar signals might be processed as differently attractive in honeybees, this thesis concludes that the sugar receptor inhibition via quinine in honeybees might depend on the receptor (or its co-receptor), is concentration-dependent and based on the salience or attractiveness and concentration of the sugar present.
With my thesis, I was able to expand the knowledge on honeybee’s sugar perception and formulate a complex, comprehensive overview. Thereby, I demonstrated the multidimensional mechanism that regulates the sugar receptors and thus the sugar perception of honeybees. With this work, I defined AmGr1 and AmGr3 as the basis of sugar perception and enlarged these components to the co-receptor AmGr2 and the possible splice variants of AmGr1. I further demonstrated how those sugar receptor components function, interact and that they are clearly involved in the division of labor in honeybees. In summary, my thesis describes the mechanisms that enable honeybees to perceive sugar in a complex way, even though they inhere a limited number of sugar receptors. My data strongly suggest that honeybees overall might not only differentiate sugars and their diet by their general sweetness (as expected with only one main sugar receptor). The found sugar receptor mechanisms and their interplay further suggest that honeybees might be able to discriminate directly between monosaccharides and disaccharides or sugar molecules and with that their diet (honey and nectar).