Doctoral Thesis
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (21)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (21)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (21) (remove)
Keywords
- Angststörung (21) (remove)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (15)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (11)
- Institut für Psychologie (4)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (2)
- Kinderklinik und Poliklinik (1)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I (1)
Maladaptive avoidance behaviors can contribute to the maintenance of fear, anxiety, and anxiety disorders. It has been proposed that, throughout anxiety disorder progression, extensively repeated avoidance may become a habit (i.e., habitual avoidance) instead of being controlled by internal threat-related goals (i.e., goal-directed avoidance). However, the process of the acquisition of habitual avoidance in anxiety disorders is not yet well understood. Accordingly, the current thesis aimed to investigate experimentally whether trait anxiety and anxiety disorders are associated with an increased shift from goal-directed to habitual avoidance.
The aim of Study 1 was to develop an experimental operationalization of maladaptive habitual avoidance. To this end, we adapted a commonly used action control task, the outcome devaluation paradigm. In this task, habitual avoidance was operationalized as persistent responses after extensive training to avoid an unpleasant stimulus when the aversive outcome was devalued, i.e., when individuals knew the aversive outcome could not occur anymore. We included indicators for costly and low-cost habitual avoidance, whereby habitual avoidance was associated with a monetary cost, while low-cost habitual avoidance was not associated with monetary costs. In Experiment 1 of Study 1, a pronounced costly and non-costly outcome devaluation effect was observed. However, this result may have partly resulted from trial-and-error learning or a better-safe-than-sorry strategy since not instructions about the stimulus-response-outcome contingencies after the outcome devaluation procedure had been provided to the participants. In Experiment 2 of Study 1, instructions on these stimulus-response-outcome contingencies were included to prevent the potential confounders. As a result, we observed no indicators for costly habitual avoidance, but evidence for low-cost habitual avoidance, potentially because competing goal-directed responses could easily be implemented and inhibited costly habitual avoidance tendencies.
In Study 2, the strength of habitual avoidance acquisition was compared between participants with and without anxiety disorders, using the experimental task of Experiment 1 in Study 1. The results indicated that costly and low-cost habitual avoidance was not more pronounced in participants with anxiety disorders than in the healthy control group. However, in an exploratory subgroup comparison, panic disorder predicted more substantial habitual avoidance acquisition than social anxiety disorder.
In Study 3, we investigated whether trait anxiety as a risk factor for anxiety disorders is associated with a specific increased shift from goal-directed to habitual avoidance and approach. The task from the Experiment 1 of Study 1 was adapted to include parallel versions for operationalizing habitual avoidance and habitual approach responses. Using a within-subjects design, the individuals – pre-screened for high and low trait anxiety – took part in the approach and the avoidance outcome devaluation task version. The results suggested stronger non-costly habitual responses in more highly trait-anxious individuals independent of the task version, and suggested a tendency towards an impact of trait anxiety on costly habitual approach rather than on costly habitual avoidance.
In summary, individuals with high trait anxiety or anxiety disorders did not develop habitual avoidance more readily than individuals with low trait anxiety or without anxiety disorders. Therefore, this thesis does not support the assumption that an increased tendency to acquire habitual avoidance contributes to persistent maladaptive avoidance in anxiety disorders. The thesis also contributes to the discourse on the validity of outcome devaluation studies in general by highlighting the impact of task features, such as the instructions after the outcome devaluation procedure or the task difficulty in the test phase, on the experimental results. Such validity issues may partly explain the heterogeneity of findings in research with the outcome devaluation paradigm. We suggest ways towards more valid operationalizations of habitual avoidance in future studies.
Even though exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) constitutes a first-line treatment for anxiety disorders, a substantial proportion of patients does not respond in a clinically significant manner. The identification of pre-treatment patient characteristics that are associated with treatment outcome might aid in improving response rates. Therefore, the present doctoral thesis aimed at investigating moderators of treatment outcome in anxiety disorders: first, we investigated the neural correlates of comorbidity among primary panic disorder/agoraphobia (PD/AG) and secondary social anxiety disorder (SAD) moderating treatment outcome towards exposure-based CBT. Second, pre-treatment functional resting-state connectivity signatures of treatment response in specific phobia were studied. Within the first study, we compared PD/AG patients with or without secondary SAD regarding their clinical and neurofunctional outcome towards a manualized CBT treatment focusing on PD/AG symptoms. Prior to treatment, PD/AG+SAD compared to PD/AG-SAD patients exhibited a specific neural signature within the temporal lobe, which was attenuated to the level of PD/AG-SAD patients afterwards. CBT was equally effective in both groups. Thus, comorbidity among those two anxiety disorders did not alter treatment outcome substantially. This might be due to the high overlap of shared pathophysiological features within both disorders. In the second study, we assessed pre-treatment functional resting-state connectivity within a sample of spider phobic patients that were treated with massed in virtuo exposure. We found responders already prior to treatment to be characterized by stronger inhibitory frontolimbic connectivity as well as heightened connectivity between the amygdala and regions related to the ventral visual stream. Furthermore, patients demonstrating high within-session extinction exhibited pronounced intrinsic prefrontal connectivity. Our results point to responders exhibiting a brain prepared for the mechanism of action of exposure. Taken together, results highlight the major impact of pre-treatment characteristics on treatment outcome. Both, PD/AG+SAD patients as well as responders within the SpiderVR study exhibited heightened activation or connectivity within the ventral visual pathway and the amygdala. Pronounced visual processing together with enhanced executive control and emotion regulation seem to constitute a fruitful soil for successful exposure. The results provide starting points for personalized treatment approaches in order to improve treatment success in the anxiety disorders. Future studies are needed to investigate the benefit of neuroscientifically informed CBT augmentation strategies such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Predictability of threat is one of the key modulators of neural activity in fear and anxiety-related threat processes and there is a considerable number of studies focusing on the exact contribution of centromedial amygdala and Bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) in animals as well as in humans. In this research field, some studies already investigated the differential involvement of both areas during temporally predictable and unpredictable threat processes in humans. However, these studies showed several limitations e.g. small sample size, no predictable threat conditions, no separation of anticipation and confrontation processes, which should be addressed in future studies. Furthermore, evidence for group-based inter-individual differences of amygdala and BNST activity during predictable and unpredictable threat processes have not been studied extensively.
Several studies suggest a relevant role of the amygdala and BNST activity in phobic processes in patients with specific phobia, but no study so far has investigated the exact contribution of centromedial amygdala (CM) and BNST during temporally predictable and unpredictable threat processes in specific phobia.
This thesis consisted of three studies and aimed to evaluate the exact contribution of CM and BNST during temporally predictable and unpredictable threat anticipation and confrontation with the use of an optimized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm, which aimed to solve methodological limitations of recent studies. Study 1 used a large sample of healthy participants who were grouped based on NPSR1 genotype, and study 2 and study 3 used a sample of patients with spider phobia. In sum, the results of all three studies indicated, that BNST is more relevant for anticipation processes as compared to the CM. Contrary, during the confrontation phase the CM displays a greater relevance for threat confrontation processes.
In recent years, various studies have investigated the extent to which treatment success can be predicted in patients with anxiety disorders based on pre-treatment fMRI activity. Therefore, this was investigated for the first time in study 3 in patients with spider phobia during temporally predictable and unpredictable threat processes. Results indicated that independent of temporal predictability lower anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activity during threat anticipation and engaged BNST during threat confrontation might be benefitting factors for successful therapy response in spider phobia.
In vorgegangenen Studien wurde bei erwachsenen Patienten mit Angststörungen eine verstärkte Furchtgeneralisierung, eine eingeschränkte Fähigkeit zur Reizdiskrimination sowie eine veränderte Aufmerksamkeitsverteilung nachgewiesen. In einer gesunden Studienpopulation konnte bei Kindern eine stärkere Furchtgeneralisierung nachgewiesen werden als bei Erwachsenen. Ihre Generalisierungsgradienten gleichen denen von Erwachsenen mit Angststörung. Möglicherweise haben gestörte Lernprozesse in der Kindheit somit langfristige Effekte auf die Entwicklung von Angststörungen. Obwohl die Vorgänge des Furchtlernens im Kindesalter entscheidend für das Verständnis von Angststörungen sind, gibt es kaum Studien in dieser Altersgruppe. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Zusammenhänge von Furchtgeneralisierung und Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen in einer klinischen Population mit internalisierender Störung im Kindes- und Jugendalter.
Hierzu durchliefen Kinder und Jugendliche mit internalisierender Störung (n= 49) sowie gesunde Kontrollen (n=48) im Alter von 9 bis 17 Jahre ein Furcht-generalisierungsparadigma mit Diskriminationstraining sowie einen modifizierten Dotprobe mit integriertem Eyetracking. Die Ängstlichkeit wurde mittels verschiedener Angstfragebögen gemessen. Im Generalisierungsparadigma wurden zwei weibliche Gesichter mit neutralem Gesichtsausdruck als Stimuli verwendet, die entweder mit (CS+) oder ohne (CS-) einem 95dB lauten Schrei sowie einem angsterfüllten Gesichtsausdruck gezeigt wurden. Zur Messung der Furchtreaktion wurden subjektive Ratings für Arousal, Valenz und Kontingenz erfasst, zudem wurde die Hautleitfähigkeit gemessen. Zur Auswertung des Dotprobes wurden die Reaktionszeiten und die Initialsakkade erfasst. Die statistische Analyse des Furchtgeneralisierungsparadigmas sowie des Dotprobe-Paradigmas wurde mittels Multivarianzanalysen mit Messwiederholung durchgeführt, gefolgt von t-Tests zur weiterführenden Analyse. Desweiteren wurden die Aufmerksamkeitsreaktionen von nicht-ängstlichen und ängstlichen Teilnehmern in Kategorien eingeteilt und mittels Chi-Quadrat Analysen verglichen. Zur Analyse des Zusammenhangs zwischen Furchtgeneralisierung und Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen erfolgte eine Regressionsanalyse mit einem GS Mittelwert als abhängiger Variable und der Ängstlichkeit und den Aufmerk-samkeitsprozessen als Prädiktoren.
Die Ergebnisse bestätigten eine solide Furchtkonditionierung anhand des „Screaming Lady“-Paradigmas in einer klinischen Population, dies war erkennbar an höheren Ratings für den aversiven Stimulus im Vergleich zum sicheren Stimulus in beiden Gruppen. Grundsätzlich höhere Furchtratings sowie höhere Ratings der Generalisierungsstimuli im Vergleich zum sicheren Stimulus wiesen auf eine stärkere Generalisierung in der Untergruppe mit höherem Angst-Trait innerhalb der internalisierenden Probandengruppe hin. Die Analyse der Dotprobe Daten ergab schnellere Reaktionszeiten sowie häufigere Initialsakkaden gegenüber furchteinflößenden Stimuli bei Patienten mit internalisierender Störung. Des Weiteren zeigten sehr ängstliche Probanden häufiger einen Attentional bias im Chi Quadrat Test als nicht-ängstliche Probanden. Dies wies daraufhin, dass sowohl bei Patienten mit internalisierender Störung als auch bei sehr ängstlichen Probanden ein Attentional bias gegenüber furchtrelevanten Stimuli vorliegt. Vor allem bei Kindern mit internalisierender Störung sagten die Ängstlichkeit und veränderte Aufmerksamkeitsprozesse die Ausprägung der Furchtgeneralisierung voraus. Somit kann ein Zusammenhang von veränderten Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen und Furchtgeneralisierung vermutet werden.
Fear and anxiety disorders – interaction of AVP and OXT brain systems with the serotonergic system
(2023)
Anxiety disorders pose a great burden onto society and economy and can have devastating consequences for affected individuals. Treatment options are still limited to psychopharmacotherapy originally developed for the treatment of depression and behavioral therapy. A combination of genetic traits together with aversive events is most likely the cause of these diseases. Gene x environment studies are trying to find a link between genetic traits and specific negative circumstances. In a first study, we focused on social anxiety disorder (SAD), which is the second most-common anxiety disorder after specific phobias. We used a social fear conditioning (SFC) paradigm, which is able to mimic the disease in a mouse model. We wanted to investigate protein levels, as well as mRNA expression of immediate early genes (IEGs), to determine brain areas affected by the paradigm. We also included genes of the vasopressin (AVP)-, oxytocin (OXT)-, neuropeptide Y (NPY)-, and the serotonin system, to investigate the effects of SFC on neurotransmitter gene expression levels in brain regions related to social as well as fear-related behavior. AVP and OXT regulate a lot of different social and anxiety-related behaviors, both positive and negative. Finding a link between different neurotransmitter systems in the development of anxiety disorders could help to identify potential targets for new treatment approaches, which are desperately needed, because the rate of patients not responding to available treatment is very high.
We were able to show altered gene expression of the IEGs cFos and Fosl2, as well as a change in number and density of cFOS-positive cells in the dorsal hippocampus, indicating an influence of SFC on neuronal activity. Our results reveal a possible involvement of anterior dentate gyrus (DG), as well as cornu ammonis area 1 (CA1) and CA3 in the dorsal hippocampus during the expression of social fear. Contrary to our hypothesis, we were not able to see changes in neuronal activity through expression changes of IEGs in the amygdala. Significant higher IEG immunoreactivity and gene expression in the dorsal hippocampus of animals without fear conditioning (SFC-), compared to animals with fear conditioning (SFC+), indicate an involvement of different hippocampal regions in two possible scenarios. Either as elevated gene expression in SFC- animals compared to SFC+ animals or as reduction in SFC+ animals compared to SFC- animals. However, this question cannot be answered without an additional control of basal IEG-activity without social interaction. The NPY system in general and the neuropeptide y receptor type 2 in particular seem to be involved in regulating the response to social fear, mostly through the septum region. In addition to that, a possible role for the induction of social fear response could be identified in the serotonergic system and especially the serotonin receptor 2a of the PVN.
In a second study we focused on changes in the serotonergic system. A polymorphism in the human serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene is associated with higher risks for the development of anxiety disorders. This makes the 5-HTT a widely used target to study possible causes and the development of anxiety disorders. In mice, a genetically induced knockout of the 5-Htt gene is associated with increased anxiety-like behavior. High amounts of stress during pregnancy, also known as prenatal stress, significantly increase the risk to develop psychiatric disorders for the unborn child. We utilized a prenatal stress paradigm in mice heterozygous for the 5-Htt gene. Some of the animals which had been subjected to prenatal stress showed noticeably “unsocial” interaction behavior towards conspecifics. Again, we were searching for links between the serotonergic system and AVP- and OXT systems. Through quantitative gene expression analysis, we were able to show that both AVP and OXT neuromodulator systems are affected through prenatal stress in female mice, but not in male mice. The 5-Htt genotype seems to be only slightly influential to AVP, OXT or any other neurotransmitter system investigated. Gene expression of AVP and OXT brain systems is highly influenced through the estrous cycle stages of female mice. Additionally, we analyzed the AVP and OXT neuropeptide levels of mice with different 5-Htt genotypes and in both sexes, in order to see whether the production of AVP and OXT is influenced by 5-Htt genotype. On neuropeptide level, we were able to identify a sex difference for vasopressin-immunoreactive (ir) cells in the PVN, with male mice harboring significantly more positive cells than female mice.
Emotional-associative learning processes such as fear conditioning and extinction are highly relevant to not only the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders (ADs), but also to their treatment. Extinction, as the laboratory analogue to behavioral exposure, is assumed a core process underlying the treatment of ADs. Although exposure-based treatments are highly effective for the average patient suffering from an AD, there remains a gap in treatment efficacy with over one third of patients failing to achieve clinically significant symptom relief. There is ergo a pressing need for intensified research regarding the underlying neural mechanisms of aberrant emotional-associative learning processes and the neurobiological moderators of treatment (non-)response in ADs.
The current thesis focuses on different applications of the fundamental principles of fear conditioning and extinction by using two example cases of ADs from two different multicenter trials. First, we targeted alterations in fear acquisition, extinction, and its recall as a function of psychopathology in panic disorder (PD) patients compared to healthy subjects using fMRI. Second, exposure-based therapy and pre-treatment patient characteristics exerting a moderating influence on this essential learning process later on (i.e. treatment outcome) were examined using multimodal functional and structural neuroimaging in spider phobia.
We observed aberrations in emotional-associative learning processes in PD patients compared to healthy subjects indicated by an accelerated fear acquisition and an attenuated extinction recall. Furthermore, pre-treatment differences related to defensive, regulatory, attentional, and perceptual processes may exert a moderating influence on treatment outcome to behavioral exposure in spider phobia. Although the current results need further replication, on an integrative meta level, results point to a hyperactive defensive network system and deficient emotion regulation processes (including extinction processes) and top-down control in ADs. This speaks in favor of transdiagnostic deficits in important functional domains in ADs.
Deficits in transdiagnostic domains such as emotion regulation processes could be targeted by enhancing extinction learning or by means of promising tools like neurofeedback. The detection of pre-treatment clinical response moderators, for instance via machine learning frameworks, may help in supporting clinical decision making on individually tailored treatment approaches or, respectively, to avoid ineffective treatment and its related financial costs. In the long run, the identification of neurobiological markers which are capable of detecting non-responders a priori represents an ultimate goal.
Anxiety research is one of the major psychological research domains and looks back on decades of research activity. Traditionally, novel theories and approaches are tested utilizing animal models. One way to study inherent anxiety in rodents is the elevated plus-maze (EPM). The EPM is a plus-shaped platform with two closed, i.e., walled, arms and two open unwalled arms. If given the opportunity to freely explore the apparatus, rodents instinctively avoid the open arms to protect themselves from predators. Hence, they spent less time on open and more time on closed arms, which is behaviorally associated with general anxiety. In the course of the pharmacological validation, it was found that this exploratory pattern can be reversed by anxiolytic substances, e.g., benzodiazepines, or potentiated by anxiogenics. One of the significant advantages of the EPM is that no prior training session is required in contrast to conditioning studies, thus allowing to observe natural behavior. Therefore, together with the economic and uncomplicated setup, the EPM has become a standard preclinical rodent anxiety test over the decades. In order to validate these rodent anxiety tests, there have recently been attempts to retranslate them to humans. A paramount of cross-species validation is not only the simple transferability of these animal tests but also the observation of anxiety behaviors that are evolutionarily conserved across species. Accordingly, it could be possible to conclude various factors associated with the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders in humans. So far, convincing translations of the EPM to humans are still lacking. For that reason, the primary aim of this dissertation is to retranslate the EPM throughout three studies and to evaluate cross-species validity critically. Secondly, the undertaken studies are set out to observe ambulatory activity equivalent to rodent EPM behavior, i.e., open arm avoidance. Thirdly, the undertaken studies aimed to assess the extent to which trait anxiety influences human exploratory activity on the platform to associate it with the assumption that rodent EPM-behavior is a reflection of general anxiety. Finally, virtual reality (VR) was the method of choice to maintain the economic advantage and adjust the EPM size to humans. Study 1 (N = 30) was set up to directly transfer the rodent EPM regarding test design and experimental procedure using a Computer Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE). The results revealed that humans unlike rodents display a general open arms approach during free exploration. However, open arm avoidance was associated with high trait anxiety and acrophobia (fear of height), which was initially assessed as a control variable due to the virtual platform height. Regression analyses and subjective anxiety ratings hinted at a more significant influence of acrophobia on open arm avoidance. In addition, it was assumed that the open arms approach might have resulted from claustrophobic tendencies experienced in the closed arms due to the high walls. Study 2 (N = 61) sought to differentiate the influence of trait anxiety and acrophobia and adapt the virtual EPM to humans. Therefore, parts of the platform held a semi-transparent grid-floor texture, and the wall height on the closed arms was reduced to standard handrail level. Moreover, participants were priorly screened to exclude clinically significant levels of acrophobia, claustrophobia, and agoraphobia. The data on general exploratory activity showed no arm preference. Regression analyses confirmed that acrophobia is related to open arm avoidance, corroborating the finding of Study 1. Surprisingly, for trait anxiety, the result of Study 1 could not be replicated. Instead, for trait anxiety, no significant effect was found indicating that predominantly fear of heights shapes human EPM behavior even on a subclinical stage. In Study 3 (N = 57), the EPM was embedded into a city setting to 1) create a more natural human environment and 2) eliminate height. Furthermore, a head-mounted display was utilized for VR presentation, and arousal ratings were introduced. Participants were screened for high and low levels of trait anxiety and agoraphobia, and claustrophobia. Replicating the findings of Study 2, no difference in open and closed arm activity was observed, and no effect was found in relationship with trait anxiety. The data on anxiety ratings and claustrophobia suggest a positive correlation indicating that in this city EPM, claustrophobic tendencies might play a role in closed arm avoidance. In summary, this thesis added valuable insights into the retranslation of a well-established standard anxiety test used in rodents. However, it also majorly challenges current findings on the cross-species validity of the EPM. Various explanatory models for the results are critically discussed and associated with clinical implications concerning future research.
Bereits vorangegangene Studien haben zeigen können, dass eine verstärke Generali- sierung von Furcht sowohl bei Erwachsenen, bei denen beispielsweise eine Angststörung oder eine PTSB diagnostiziert wurde, aber auch bei gesunden Kindern eine Rolle spielt. In unserer Studie untersuchten wir eine Gruppe Kinder und Jugendliche (n = 31, m = 25, w = 6; Alter = 13.35 ± 2.03), die eine Störung des Sozialverhaltens aufwiesen, auf die Konditionierbarkeit von Furcht und eine mögliche Furchtgeneralisierung. Diese Gruppe verglichen wir mit einer gesunden Kontrollgruppe (n = 29, m = 11, w = 18; Alter = 14.28 ± 2.43). Als Generalisierungsstimuli verwendeten wir ein Furchtgeneralisierungsparadigma mit zwei Frauengesichtern, die in vier Schritten aneinander angeglichen wurden. Zusätzlich führten wir mit beiden Probandengruppen ein Dot-Probe-Paradigma zur Objektivierung von Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen im Sinne eines Attentional Bias oder Attentional Avoidance mit emotionalen Gesichtern durch. Wir konnten eine erfolgreiche Furchtkonditionierung für beide Gruppen erreichen. Im Vergleich mit der gesunden Kontrollgruppe zeigte die externalisierende Probandengruppe eine verstärke Furchtgeneralisierung.
Hinsichtlich der subjektiven Valenz- und Kontingenzratings wurden die Unterschiede besonders deutlich. Eine verstärkte Generalisierungsneigung bei erhöhter Trait-Angst konnten wir nicht finden. Die externalisierende Gruppe zeigte im Vergleich mit neutralen Gesichtern bei den emotionalen Gesichtern insgesamt einen Attentional Bias. Am deutlichsten war dabei eine verstärkte Aufmerksamkeitslenkung hin zu glücklichen Gesichtern festzustellen. Für die gesunde Kontrollgruppe konnten wir keine Besonderheiten bezüglich der Aufmerksamkeitsrichtung finden. Weiterführende Studien sollten mit größ- eren Probandengruppen und nach Geschlecht und Alter gepaarten Probanden durch- geführt werden. Mit externalisierenden Probanden sollte ein Furchtgeneralisierungs- paradigma mit neutralen Stimuli (z.B. Ringe) gewählt werden, um eine subjektive Wertung emotionaler Gesichter bei den Ratings als Störfaktor auszuschließen. Für externalisierende Probanden sollte außerdem die Ausprägung von CU-Traits erfasst und die Dauer der Testung verkürzt oder auf zwei Termine aufgeteilt werden, um eine ausreichende Konzentrationsfähigkeit zu ermöglichen.
Angsterkrankungen stellen mit einer 12-Monats-Prävalenz von 14% die häufigsten psychischen Erkrankungen in der westlichen Gesellschaft dar. Angesichts der hohen querschnittlichen wie sequentiellen Komorbidität von Angsterkrankungen, der ausgeprägten individuellen Einschränkungen sowie der hohen ökonomischen Belastung für das Gesundheitssystem ist neben therapeutischen Behandlungsansätzen die Entwicklung von kurzzeitigen, kostengünstigen und leicht zugänglichen Präventionsmaßnahmen von großer Bedeutung und steht zunehmend im Fokus des gesundheitspolitischen Interesses, um die Inzidenz von Angsterkrankungen zu reduzieren. Voraussetzung für die Entwicklung von gezielten und damit den effektivsten Präventionsmaßnahmen sind valide Risikofaktoren, die die Entstehung von Angsterkrankungen begünstigen. Ein Konstrukt, das in der Literatur als subklinisches Symptom in Form einer kognitiven Vulnerabilität für Angsterkrankungen und damit als Risikofaktor angesehen wird, ist die sogenannte Angstsensitivität (AS). AS umfasst die individuelle Tendenz, angstbezogene körperliche Symptome generell als bedrohlich einzustufen und mit aversiven Konsequenzen zu assoziieren.
Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war daher die Etablierung und Validierung eines Präventionsprogramms zur Reduktion der AS an einer nicht-klinischen Stichprobe von 100 Probanden (18-30 Jahre) mit einer erhöhten AS (Anxiety Sensitivity Index [ASI-3] ≥17) sowie die Rekrutierung von 100 alters- und geschlechtsangeglichenen Probanden mit niedriger Angstsensitivität (ASI-3 <17). In einem randomisiert-kontrollierten Studiendesign durchliefen die Probanden mit hoher AS entweder das über fünf Wochen angelegte „Kognitive Angstsensitivitätstraining“ (KAST) als erste deutschsprachige Übersetzung des Computer-basierten „Cognitive Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment“ (CAST) von Schmidt et al. (2014) oder wurden der Wartelisten-Kontrollgruppe zugeteilt. Das KAST Training bestand aus einer einmaligen Vermittlung kognitiv-behavioraler Psychoedukation zum Thema Stress und Anspannung sowie deren Auswirkungen auf den Körper und der Anleitung von zwei interozeptiven Expositionsübungen (‚Strohhalm-Atmung‘ und ‚Hyperventilation‘), die über den anschließenden Zeitraum von fünf Wochen in Form von Hausaufgaben wiederholt wurden.
Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Teilnehmer des KAST-Programms nach Beendigung des Trainings (T1) eine signifikant niedrigere AS-Ausprägung im Vergleich zur Wartelisten-Kontrollgruppe aufwiesen und diese Reduktion auch über den Katamnese-Zeitraum von sechs Monaten (T2) stabil blieb. Ergänzend wurde auch die Targetierbarkeit weiterer intermediärer Risikomarker wie der Trennungsangst (TA), des Index der kardialen Sensitivität sowie der Herzratenvariabilität (HRV) untersucht, die jedoch nicht durch das KAST-Training direkt verändert werden konnten. Im Vergleich der Subgruppen von Probanden mit hoher AS und gleichzeitig hoher TA (Adult Separation Anxiety Questionnaire [ASA-27] ≥22) und Probanden mit hoher AS, aber niedriger TA (ASA-27 <22) zeigte sich, dass die AS-TA-Hochrisikogruppe ebenfalls gut von der KAST-Intervention profitieren und eine signifikante Reduktion der AS erzielen konnte, indem sie sich bei T1 dem Niveau der Gruppe mit niedriger TA anglich. Zudem korrelierte die prozentuale Veränderung der Einstiegswerte der inneren Anspannung während der Strohhalm-Atmungsübung positiv mit der prozentualen Veränderung der dimensionalen TA bei T1.
Zusammenfassend weisen die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Arbeit erstmalig auf die Wirksamkeit der deutschsprachigen Übersetzung des CAST-Programms (Schmidt et al., 2014), eines Computer-basierten, und damit leicht zu implementierenden sowie kostengünstigen Programms, in Bezug auf die Reduktion der AS sowie indirekt der TA hin und können damit zur indizierten und demnach besonders effektiven Prävention von Angsterkrankungen in Hochrisikogruppen beitragen.