The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 9 of 91
Back to Result List

Every fifth patient suffered a high nutritional risk — Results of a prospective patient survey in an oncological outpatient center

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311284
  • Introduction Malnutrition in cancer patients often remains undetected and underestimated in clinical practice despite studies revealing prevalences from 20 to 70%. Therefore, this study aimed to identify patient groups exposed to an increased nutritional risk in a university oncological outpatient center. Methods Between May 2017 and January 2018 we screened oncological patients there using the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST). Qualitative data were collected by a questionnaire to learn about patients’ individual informationIntroduction Malnutrition in cancer patients often remains undetected and underestimated in clinical practice despite studies revealing prevalences from 20 to 70%. Therefore, this study aimed to identify patient groups exposed to an increased nutritional risk in a university oncological outpatient center. Methods Between May 2017 and January 2018 we screened oncological patients there using the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST). Qualitative data were collected by a questionnaire to learn about patients’ individual information needs and changes in patients’ diets and stressful personal nutrition restrictions. Results We included 311 patients with various cancers. 20.3% (n = 63) were found to be at high risk of malnutrition, 16.4% (n = 51) at moderate risk despite a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2. The average age was 62.7 (± 11.8) with equal gender distribution (52% women, n = 162). In 94.8% (n = 295) unintended weight loss led to MUST scoring. Patients with gastrointestinal tumors (25%, n = 78) and patients >65 years (22%, n = 68) were at higher risk. Furthermore, there was a significant association between surgery or chemotherapy within six months before survey and a MUST score ≥2 (OR = 3.6). Taste changes, dysphagia, and appetite loss were also particular risk factors (OR = 2.3–3.2). Young, female and normal-weight patients showed most interest in nutrition in cancer. However, only 38% (n = 118) had a nutritional counseling. Conclusion This study confirms that using the MUST score is a valid screening procedure to identify outpatients at risk of developing malnutrition. Here one in five was at high risk, but only 1% would have been detected by BMI alone. Therefore, an ongoing screening procedure with meaningful parameters should be urgently implemented into the clinical routine of cancer outpatients as recommended in international guidelines.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Julia Jendretzki, Dorothea Henniger, Lisa Schiffmann, Constanze Wolz, Anne Kollikowski, Alexander Meining, Hermann Einsele, Marcela Winkler, Claudia Löffler
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311284
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Medizinische Fakultät / Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Frontiers in Nutrition
ISSN:2296-861X
Year of Completion:2022
Volume:9
Article Number:1033265
Source:Frontiers in Nutrition (2022) 9:1033265. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1033265
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1033265
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:MUST-Score; malnutrition; nutritional counseling; nutritional medical needs; nutritional risk screening; oncology outpatients
Release Date:2023/04/21
Date of first Publication:2022/10/31
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2022
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International