• Treffer 2 von 2
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Interaction of oculomotor and manual behavior: evidence from simulated driving in an approach–avoidance steering task

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200419
  • Background While the coordination of oculomotor and manual behavior is essential for driving a car, surprisingly little is known about this interaction, especially in situations requiring a quick steering reaction. In the present study, we analyzed oculomotor gaze and manual steering behavior in approach and avoidance tasks. Three task blocks were implemented within a dynamic simulated driving environment requiring the driver either to steer away from/toward a visual stimulus or to switch between both tasks. Results Task blocks requiringBackground While the coordination of oculomotor and manual behavior is essential for driving a car, surprisingly little is known about this interaction, especially in situations requiring a quick steering reaction. In the present study, we analyzed oculomotor gaze and manual steering behavior in approach and avoidance tasks. Three task blocks were implemented within a dynamic simulated driving environment requiring the driver either to steer away from/toward a visual stimulus or to switch between both tasks. Results Task blocks requiring task switches were associated with higher manual response times and increased error rates. Manual response times did not significantly differ depending on whether drivers had to steer away from vs toward a stimulus, whereas oculomotor response times and gaze pattern variability were increased when drivers had to steer away from a stimulus compared to steering toward a stimulus. Conclusion The increased manual response times and error rates in mixed tasks indicate performance costs associated with cognitive flexibility, while the increased oculomotor response times and gaze pattern variability indicate a parsimonious cross-modal action control strategy (avoiding stimulus fixation prior to steering away from it) for the avoidance scenario. Several discrepancies between these results and typical eye–hand interaction patterns in basic laboratory research suggest that the specific goals and complex perceptual affordances associated with driving a vehicle strongly shape cross-modal control of behavior.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Norbert Schneider, Lynn Huestegge
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200419
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften (Philos., Psycho., Erziehungs- u. Gesell.-Wissensch.) / Institut für Psychologie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Erscheinungsjahr:2019
Band / Jahrgang:4
Seitenangabe:19
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2019) 4:19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0170-7
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0170-7
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Freie Schlagwort(e):driving simulation; gaze control; steering; visual orientation
Datum der Freischaltung:11.03.2020
Sammlungen:Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2019
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International