• search hit 7 of 26
Back to Result List

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy — postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost effectiveness

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286203
  • Robotic-assisted colon surgery may contain advantages over the laparoscopic approach, but clear evidence is sparse. This study aimed to analyze postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. All consecutive patients who received minimal-invasive left hemicolectomy at the Department of Surgery I at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg in 2021 were prospectively included. Importantly, no patient selection for either procedure was carried out. TheRobotic-assisted colon surgery may contain advantages over the laparoscopic approach, but clear evidence is sparse. This study aimed to analyze postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. All consecutive patients who received minimal-invasive left hemicolectomy at the Department of Surgery I at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg in 2021 were prospectively included. Importantly, no patient selection for either procedure was carried out. The robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic approaches were compared head to head for postoperative short-term outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness. A total of 61 patients were included, with 26 patients having received a robotic-assisted approach. Baseline characteristics did not differ among the groups. Patients receiving a robotic-assisted approach had a significantly decreased length of hospital stay as well as lower rates of complications in comparison to patients who received laparoscopic surgery (n = 35). In addition, C-reactive protein as a marker of systemic stress response was significantly reduced postoperatively in patients who were operated on in a robotic-assisted manner. Consequently, robotic-assisted surgery could be performed in a cost-effective manner. Thus, robotic-assisted left hemicolectomy represents a safe and cost-effective procedure and might improve patient outcomes in comparison to laparoscopic surgery.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Anna Widder, Matthias Kelm, Joachim Reibetanz, Armin Wiegering, Niels Matthes, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Florian Seyfried, Sven Flemming
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286203
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I)
Medizinische Fakultät / Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften
Medizinische Fakultät / Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken
Language:English
Parent Title (English):International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ISSN:1660-4601
Year of Completion:2022
Volume:19
Issue:17
Article Number:10606
Source:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2022) 19:17, 10606. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710606
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710606
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:colon resection; cost-effectiveness; left hemicolectomy; postoperative inflammation; robotic surgery
Release Date:2023/04/20
Date of first Publication:2022/08/25
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2022
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International