• Treffer 7 von 26
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy — postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost effectiveness

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286203
  • Robotic-assisted colon surgery may contain advantages over the laparoscopic approach, but clear evidence is sparse. This study aimed to analyze postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. All consecutive patients who received minimal-invasive left hemicolectomy at the Department of Surgery I at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg in 2021 were prospectively included. Importantly, no patient selection for either procedure was carried out. TheRobotic-assisted colon surgery may contain advantages over the laparoscopic approach, but clear evidence is sparse. This study aimed to analyze postoperative inflammation status, short-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. All consecutive patients who received minimal-invasive left hemicolectomy at the Department of Surgery I at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg in 2021 were prospectively included. Importantly, no patient selection for either procedure was carried out. The robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic approaches were compared head to head for postoperative short-term outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness. A total of 61 patients were included, with 26 patients having received a robotic-assisted approach. Baseline characteristics did not differ among the groups. Patients receiving a robotic-assisted approach had a significantly decreased length of hospital stay as well as lower rates of complications in comparison to patients who received laparoscopic surgery (n = 35). In addition, C-reactive protein as a marker of systemic stress response was significantly reduced postoperatively in patients who were operated on in a robotic-assisted manner. Consequently, robotic-assisted surgery could be performed in a cost-effective manner. Thus, robotic-assisted left hemicolectomy represents a safe and cost-effective procedure and might improve patient outcomes in comparison to laparoscopic surgery.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Anna Widder, Matthias Kelm, Joachim Reibetanz, Armin Wiegering, Niels Matthes, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Florian Seyfried, Sven Flemming
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286203
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I)
Medizinische Fakultät / Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften
Medizinische Fakultät / Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ISSN:1660-4601
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Band / Jahrgang:19
Heft / Ausgabe:17
Aufsatznummer:10606
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2022) 19:17, 10606. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710606
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710606
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Freie Schlagwort(e):colon resection; cost-effectiveness; left hemicolectomy; postoperative inflammation; robotic surgery
Datum der Freischaltung:20.04.2023
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:25.08.2022
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2022
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International