The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 9 of 11
Back to Result List

Visual clustering of transcriptomic data from primary and metastatic tumors — dependencies and novel pitfalls

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281872
  • Personalized oncology is a rapidly evolving area and offers cancer patients therapy options that are more specific than ever. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding transcriptomic similarities or differences of metastases and corresponding primary sites. Applying two unsupervised dimension reduction methods (t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP)) on three datasets of metastases (n = 682 samples) with three different data transformations (unprocessed, log10Personalized oncology is a rapidly evolving area and offers cancer patients therapy options that are more specific than ever. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding transcriptomic similarities or differences of metastases and corresponding primary sites. Applying two unsupervised dimension reduction methods (t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP)) on three datasets of metastases (n = 682 samples) with three different data transformations (unprocessed, log10 as well as log10 + 1 transformed values), we visualized potential underlying clusters. Additionally, we analyzed two datasets (n = 616 samples) containing metastases and primary tumors of one entity, to point out potential familiarities. Using these methods, no tight link between the site of resection and cluster formation outcome could be demonstrated, or for datasets consisting of solely metastasis or mixed datasets. Instead, dimension reduction methods and data transformation significantly impacted visual clustering results. Our findings strongly suggest data transformation to be considered as another key element in the interpretation of visual clustering approaches along with initialization and different parameters. Furthermore, the results highlight the need for a more thorough examination of parameters used in the analysis of clusters.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: André Marquardt, Philip Kollmannsberger, Markus Krebs, Antonella Argentiero, Markus Knott, Antonio Giovanni Solimando, Alexander Georg Kerscher
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281872
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik
Medizinische Fakultät / Pathologisches Institut
Fakultät für Biologie / Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology
Medizinische Fakultät / Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Genes
ISSN:2073-4425
Year of Completion:2022
Volume:13
Issue:8
Article Number:1335
Source:Genes (2022) 13:8, 1335. doi:10.3390/genes13081335
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081335
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:UMAP; cancer; metastasis; t-SNE; transcriptomic analysis; visual clustering
Release Date:2023/04/20
Date of first Publication:2022/07/26
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2022
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International