Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (15)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (15)
Keywords
- Arzneimitteldesign (2)
- Aurora-A (2)
- Gephyrin (2)
- Protein-Protein-Wechselwirkung (2)
- Wirkstoffdesign (2)
- gephyrin (2)
- 7,8-Dihydroxyflavon (1)
- 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (1)
- Actin cytoskeleton-related protein (1)
- Aurora-A-MYCN-Komplex (1)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (14)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (5)
- Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie (1)
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (1)
- Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie (1)
- Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1)
Die Interaktion des onkogenen Transkriptionsfaktors MYCN mit der Ser/Thr Kinase Aurora-A verhindert
dessen Abbau über das Ubiquitin Proteasomsystem indem die Rekrutierung des SCF FbxW7 Komplexes
verhindert wird. Die Kinase nimmt mit der Bindung an MYCN eine aktive Konformation ein und erhält
somit die Fähigkeit zur Kinaseaktivität ohne die sonst notwendige Phosphorylierung von Thr288 oder
die Anwesenheit eines Aktivators wie TPX2. Da hohe MYCN Konzentrationen Tumore wie
Neuroblastome antreiben, ist die Störung der Komplexbildung mit Aurora-A eine valide Strategie zur
Entwicklung von Chemotherapeutika. Einige Inhibitoren von Aurora-A wie Alisertib (MLN8237) sind in
der Lage, eine Konformationsänderung in der Kinase zu verursachen, die mit der Bindung von MYCN
inkompatibel ist und auf diese Weise den Abbau des Transkriptionsfaktors induziert. Da Aurora-A
wichtige Funktionen in der Mitose übernimmt, könnte eine direkte Adressierung des Komplexes anstelle
einer systemischen Inhibition der Kinase vielversprechender sein.
Ziel des Projektes war die Identifizierung von Molekülen, die selektiv an das Interface des
Aurora-A – MYCN Komplexes binden und weiter optimiert werden können, um einen gezielten Abbau
des Transkriptionsfaktors über einen PROTAC Ansatz zu ermöglichen. Virtuelle Screenings und
molekulardynamische Simulationen wurden durchgeführt, um kommerziell erhältliche Verbindungen zu
identifizieren, welche mit einer Bindetasche des Komplexes interagieren, die nur zustande kommt, wenn
beide Proteine miteinander interagieren. Aus einem ersten Set von zehn potentiellen Liganden wurde
für vier eine selektive Interaktion mit dem Protein – Protein Komplex gegenüber Aurora-A oder MYCN
alleine in STD-NMR Experimenten bestätigt. Zwei der Hits besaßen ein identisches Grundgerüst und
wurden als Ausganspunkt für die Optimierung zu potenteren Liganden genutzt. Das Gerüst wurde
fragmentweise vergrößert und in Richtung besserer in-silico Ergebnisse und Funktionalisierung zur
Anbringung von E3-Ligase-Liganden optimiert. Neun dieser Liganden der zweiten Generation wurden
synthetisiert.
Um quantitative Bindungsdaten zu erhalten, wurde ein kovalent verknüpftes Aurora-A – MYCN
Konstrukt entworfen. Die strukturelle und funktionale Integrität wurde in STD-NMR und BLI
Experimenten mit bekannten Aurora-A Inhibitoren bestätigt, sowie in NMR-basierten ATPase Assays.
Zusätzlich konnte die Kristallstruktur des Konstrukts gelöst und damit die Validität des Designs bestätigt
werden. Quantitative Messungen der synthetisierten Moleküle identifizierten HD19S als Hit mit einer
zehnfach höheren Affinität für das Aurora-A – MYCN Konstrukt im Vergleich zu der Kinase allein.
Zusätzlich wurden in-silico Untersuchungen zu PROTACs der Aurora-A Kinase durchgeführt.
Interaktionen zwischen Aurora-A, der E3-Ligase Cereblon und den Liganden wurden modelliert und für
die Erklärung unterschiedlicher Aktivitäten der eingesetzten PROTACs verwendet. Zudem zeigte das
aktivste PROTAC eine hohe Selektivität für Aurora-A gegenüber Aurora-B, obwohl die verwendete
Erkennungseinheit (Alisertib) an beide Aurora-Proteine bindet. Dieser Umstand konnte durch
energetische Analysen von molekulardynamischen Simulationen der ternären Komplexe erklärt werden.
Optimierungsmöglichkeiten für eine effizientere Degradation von Aurora-A durch die PROTACs wurden
basierend auf modifizierten Erkennungseinheiten und verbesserten Linkern untersucht.
The ubiquitination of proteins serves as molecular signal to control an enormous number of physiological processes and its dysregulation is connected to human diseases like cancer. The versatility of this signal stems from the diverse ways by which ubiquitin can be attached to its targets. Thus, specificity and tight regulation of the ubiquitination are pivotal requirements of ubiquitin signaling. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) act at the heart of the ubiquitination cascade, transferring ubiquitin from a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) to a ubiquitin ligase (E3) or substrate. When cooperating with a RING-type E3, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes can determine linkage specificity in ubiquitin chain formation. Our understanding of the regulation of E2 activities is still limited at a structural level.
The work described here identifies two regulation mechanisms in UBE2S, a cognate E2 of the human RING-type E3 anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates in a Lys11 linkage-specific manner, thereby targeting these substrates for degradation and driving mitotic progression. In addition, UBE2S was found to have a role in DNA repair by enhancing non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and causing transcriptional arrest at DNA damage sites in homologous recombination (HR). Furthermore, UBE2S overexpression is a characteristic feature of many cancer types and is connected to poor prognosis and diminished response to therapy.
The first regulatory mechanism uncovered in this thesis involves the intramolecular auto-ubiquitination of a particular lysine residue (Lys+5) close to the active site cysteine, presumably through conformational flexibility of the active site region. The Lys+5-linked ubiquitin molecule adopts a donor-like, ‘closed’ orientation towards UBE2S, thereby conferring auto-inhibition. Notably, Lys+5 is a major physiological ubiquitination site in ~25% of the human E2 enzymes, thus providing regulatory opportunities beyond UBE2S. Besides the active, monomeric state and the auto-inhibited state caused by auto-ubiquitination, I discovered that UBE2S can adopt a dimeric state. The latter also provides an auto-inhibited state, in which ubiquitin transfer is blocked via the obstruction of donor binding. UBE2S dimerization is promoted by its unique C-terminal extension, suppresses auto-ubiquitination and thereby the proteasomal degradation of UBE2S.
Taken together, the data provided in this thesis illustrate the intricate ways by which UBE2S activity is fine-tuned and the notion that structurally diverse mechanisms have evolved to restrict the first step in the catalytic cycle of E2 enzymes.
Ubiquitylation is a protein post translational modification, in which ubiquitin is covalently attached to target protein substrates resulting in diverse cellular outcomes. Besides ubiquitin, various ubiquitin-like proteins including FAT10 exist, which are also conjugated to target proteins. The underlying modification mechanisms are conserved. In the initial step, ubiquitin or a ubiquitin-like protein is thioester-linked to a catalytic cysteine in the E1activating enzyme in an ATP-dependent manner. The respective protein modifier is then transferred to an E2 conjugating enzyme in a transthioesterification reaction. Finally, an E3 ubiquitin ligase E3 catalyzes the covalent attachment of the protein modifier to a substrate. In the case of ubiquitin, multiple ubiquitin molecules can be attached to a substrate in the form of either linear or branched polyubiquitin chains but also as single ubiquitin modifications. Depending on the nature of the ubiquitin chain, the substrates are destined to various cellular processes such as their targeted destruction by the proteasome but also non-degradative outcomes may occur.
As stated above FAT10 is a ubiquitin-like protein modifier which typically targets proteins for proteasomal degradation. It consists of two ubiquitin-like domains and is mainly expressed in cells of the human immune system. The reported involvement of FAT10 modifications in cancers and other diseases has caught the attention of the scientific community as an inhibition of the FAT10ylation process may provide avenues for novel therapeutic approaches. UBA6 is the E1 activating enzyme that resides at the apex of the FAT10 proteasomal degradation pathway. UBA6 not only recognizes FAT10 but can also activate ubiquitin as efficiently as the ubiquitin specific E1 UBA1. The dual specificity of UBA6 may complicate the inhibition FAT10ylation since targeting the active site of UBA6 will also inhibit the UBA6-catalyzed ubiquitin activation. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying principles for the dual specificity of UBA6 prior to the development of compounds interfering with FAT10ylation.
In this thesis important novel insights into the structure and function of UBA6 were derived by X-ray crystallography and biochemical methods. The first crystal structure of UBA6 reveals the multidomain architecture of this enzyme in atomic detail. The enzyme is composed of a rigid core including its active and inactive adenylation domains as well as a 4 helix bundle. Overall, the molecule adopts a “Y” shape architecture with the core at the base and the first and second catalytic half domains forming one arm of the “Y” and the ubiquitin fold domain constituting the other arm. While UBA6 shares the same domain architecture as UBA1, substantial differences were revealed by the crystal structure. In particular, the first catalytic half domain undergoes a significant shift to a position more distal from the core. This rigid body movement is assumed to generate room to accommodate the second ubiquitin-like domain of FAT10. Differences are also observed in a hydrophobic platform between the core and the first catalytic half domain and the adenylation active site in the core, which together from the binding sites for ubiquitin and FAT10. Site directed mutagenesis of key residues in these areas altered the UBA6-catalyzed activation of ubiquitin and FAT10. UBA6 variants were generated with the goal of trying to block the activation of FAT10 while still maintaining that of ubiquitin activation, in order to fully explain the dual specificity of UBA6. However, none of these mutations could block the activation of FAT10, while some of these UBA6 variants blocked ubiquitin activation. Preliminary inhibition assays with a group of E1 inhibitors belonging to the adenosyl sulfamate family demonstrated potent inhibition of FAT10ylation for two compounds. The dual specificity of UBA6 hence needs to be further examined by biochemical and structural methods. In particular, the structure of a complex between UBA6 and ubiquitin or FAT10 would provide key insights for further biochemical studies, ultimately allowing the targeted inhibition of the FAT10ylation machinery.
MicroRNAs are endogenous ≈22 nt long non coding RNA molecules that modulate gene expression
at the post transcriptional level by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression.
MicroRNA-mRNA interaction involves a contiguous and perfect pairing within complementary
sites usually in the 3’ UTR of the target mRNA. Heart failure is associated with myocyte
hypertrophy and death, due to compensatory pathological remodeling and minimal functional repair
along with microRNA deregulation.
In this study, we identified candidate microRNAs based on their expression strength in
cardiomyocytes and by their ability to regulate hypertrophy. Expression profiling from early and
late stages of heart failure showed several deregulated microRNAs. Of these microRNAs, miR-378
emerged as a potentially interesting microRNA that was highly expressed in the mouse heart and
downregulated in the failing heart. Antihypertrophic activity of miR-378 was first observed by
screening a synthetic miR library for morphologic effects on cardiomyocytes, and validated in vitro proving the tight control of hypertrophy by this miR. We combined bioinformatic target prediction analysis and microarray analysis to identify the targets of miR-378. These analyses suggested that factors of the MAP kinase pathway were enriched among miR-378 targets, namely MAPK1 itself (also termed ERK2), the insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R), growth factor receptor bound protein 2 (GRB2) and kinase suppressor of ras 1 (KSR1). Regulation of these targets by miR-378 was then confirmed by mRNA and protein expression analysis. The use of luciferase reporter constructs with natural or mutated miR-378 binding sites further validated these four proteins as direct targets of miR-378. RNA interference with MAPK1 and the other three targets prevented the prohypertrophic effect of antimiR-378, suggesting that they functionally relate to miR-378. In vivo restoration of disease induced loss of miR-378 in a pressure overload mouse model of hypertrophy using adeno associated virus resulted in partial attenuation cardiac hypertrophy and significant improvement in cardiac function along with reduced expression of the four targets in heart.
We conclude from these findings that miR-378 is an antihypertrophic microRNA in cardiomyocytes, and the main mechanism underlying this effect is the suppression of the MAP kinase-signaling pathway on four distinct levels. Restoration of disease-associated loss of miR-378 through cardiomyocyte-targeted AAV-miR-378 may prove as an effective therapeutic strategy in myocardial disease.
Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the GABA(A) Receptor Interacting Protein Muskelin
(2015)
In a study from 2011, the protein muskelin was described as a central coordinator of the retrograde transport of GABA(A) receptors in neurons. As muskelin governs the transport along actin filaments as well as microtubules, it might be the first representative of a novel class of regulators, which coordinate cargo transport across the borders of these two independent systems of transport paths and their associated motorproteins. To establish a basis for understanding the mode of operation of muskelin, the aim of this thesis was an in-depth biochemical and structural characterization of muskelin and its interaction with the GABA(A) receptor.
One focus of the work was the analysis of the oligomerization of muskelin. As could be demonstrated, the oligomerization is based on two independent interactions mediated by different domains of the protein: a known interaction of the N-terminal discoidin domain with the C-terminal portion, termed head-to-tail interaction, and a dimerization of the LisH motif in muskelin that was so far neglected in the literature. For the detailed studies of both binding events, the solution of a crystal structure of a fragment of muskelin, comprising the Discoidin domain and the LisH motif, was an important basis. The fragment crystallized as a dimer, with dimerization being mediated solely by the LisH motif. Biochemical analysis corroborated that the LisH motif in muskelin serves as a dimerization element, and, moreover, showed that the C-terminal domain of the protein substantially stabilizes this dimerization. In addition, the crystal structure revealed the molecular composition of the surface of the head in the head-to-tail interaction, namely the discoidin domain. This information enabled to map the amino acids contributing to binding, which showed that the binding site of the head-to-tail interaction coincides with the generic ligand binding site of the discoidin domain.
As part of the analyses, residues that are critical for LisH-dimerization and the head-to-tail binding, respectively, were identified, whose mutation specifically interfered with each of the interactions separately. These mutations allowed to investigate the interplay of these interactions during oligomerization. It could be shown that recombinant muskelin assembles into a tetramer to which both interactions, the LisH-dimerization and the head-to-tail binding, contribute independently. When one of the two interactions was disturbed, only a dimer mediated via the respective other interaction could be formed; when both interactions were disturbed, the protein was present as monomer. Furthermore, Frank Heisler in the group of Matthias Kneussel was able to show the drastic impact of an impaired LisH-dimerization on muskelin in cells using these mutations. Disturbing the LisH-dimerization led to a complete redistribution of the originally cytoplasmic muskelin to the nucleus which was accompanied by a severe impairment of its function during GABA(A) receptor transport. Following up on these results in an analysis of muskelin variants, for which alterations of the subcellular localization had been published earlier, the crucial influence of LisH-dimerization to the subcellular localization and thereby the role of muskelin in the cell was confirmed.
The biochemical studies of the interaction of muskelin and the alpha1 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor demonstrated a direct binding with an affinity in the low micromolar range, which is mediated primarily by the kelch repeat domain in muskelin. For the binding site on the GABA(A) receptor, it was confirmed that the thirteen most C-terminal residues of the intracellular domain are critical for the binding of muskelin. In accordance with the strong conservation of these residues among the alpha subunits of the GABA(A) receptor, it could be shown that an interaction with muskelin in vitro is also possible for the alpha2 and alpha5 subunits. Based on the comparison of the binding sites between the homologous subunits, tentative conclusions can be drawn about the details of the binding, which may serve as a starting point for follow-up studies.
This thesis thereby makes valuable contributions to the understanding of muskelin, in particular the significance of its oligomerization. It furthermore provides an experimental framework for future studies that address related topics, such as the characterization of other muskelin interaction partners, or the questions raised in this work.
Structural and biochemical characterization of gephyrin and various gephyrin-ligand complexes
(2014)
Efficient synaptic neurotransmission requires the exact apposition of presynaptic terminals and matching neurotransmitter receptor clusters on the postsynaptic side. The receptors are embedded in the postsynaptic density, which also contains scaffolding and regulatory proteins that ensure high local receptor concentrations. At inhibitory synapses the cytosolic scaffolding protein gephyrin assumes an essential organizing role within the postsynaptic density by the formation of self-oligomers which provide a high density of binding sites for certain -amino butyric acid type A (GABAA) and the large majority of glycine receptors (GlyR). Gephyrin contains two oligomerization domains: In isolation, the 20 kDa N-terminal G domain (GephG) and the 46 kDa E domain (GephE) trimerize and dimerize, respectively. In the full-length protein the domains are interconnected by a central ~150 amino acid linker, and only GephG trimerization is utilized, whereas GephE dimerization is prevented, thus suggesting the need for a trigger to release GephE autoinhibition, which would pave the way for the formation of higher oligomers and for efficient receptor clustering. The structural basis for this GephE autoinhibition has remained elusive so far, but the linker was reported to be sufficient for autoinhibition. This work dealt with the biochemical and structural characterization of apo-gephyrin and gephyrin in complexes with ligands which are known to promote the formation of synaptic gephyrin clusters (collybistin and neuroligin 2) and reorganize them (dynein light chain 1).
For full-length gephyrin no structural information has been available so far. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analyses described in this thesis disclosed that the gephyrin trimer forms a highly flexible assembly, which, due to the long linker, can switch between compact and extended conformational states in solution, with a preference for compact states. This partial compaction and potentially GephE autoinhibition are achieved by interactions of parts of the linker with the G and E domains, as suggested by circular dichroism spectroscopy. However, the linker on its own cannot account for GephE blockage, as size exclusion chromatography experiments coupled with multi angle light scattering detection (SEC-MALS) and SAXS analyses revealed that a gephyrin variant only encompassing the linker and GephE (GephLE) forms dimers and not monomers as suggested by an earlier study. The oligomeric state of GephLE and the observation that several gephyrin variants, in which linker segments of varying length were deleted, predominantly formed trimers, suggested the presence of a linker independent mechanism of GephE dimerization blockade. Taken together, the data indicated that linker-dependent and linker-independent mechanisms mediate gephyrin autoinhibition.
In the second project gephyrin’s interaction with DYNLL1 (Dynein LC8 Light Chain 1) was characterized. DYNLL1 is a 25 kDa dimer incorporated into the dynein motor and provides two binding sites, each of which can accommodate an octapeptide derived from gephyrin’s linker region (referred to as GephDB). Originally, DYNLL1 was regarded as a cargo adaptor, linking gephyrin-GlyR complexes to the dynein motor, thus driving their retrograde transport and leading to a decrease of synaptic gephyrin-GlyR complexes.
Building on these studies, this thesis assessed the cargo hypothesis as well as the so far unclear stoichiometry of the gephyrin-DYNLL1 complex. The cargo scenario would require ternary complex formation between gephyrin, DYNLL1 and the dynein intermediate chain (DIC) of the dynein motor. However, such a complex could not be detected by analytical size exclusion chromatography (aSEC) experiments – presumably because gephyrin and DIC competed for a common binding site in DYNLL1. This finding was consistent with a single DYNLL1 dimer capturing two linker segments of a single gephyrin trimer as suggested by a 26 kDa mass increase of the gephyrin species in the presence of DYNLL1 in SEC-MALS experiments. aSEC experiments at even higher concentrations (~20 µM gephyrin and ~80 µM DYNLL1) indicated that the affinity of GephDB was significantly impaired in the context of full-length gephyrin but also in a variant that bears only GephG and the first 39 residues of the linker (GephGL220). Presumably due to avidity effects two linkers stably associated with a single DYNLL1 dimer, whereas the third DYNLL1 binding motif remained predominantly unoccupied unless high concentrations of GephGL220 (50 µM) and DYNLL1 (200 µM) were used. These findings indicate that an interplay between GephG and the N-terminal linker segment mediates the attenuation of GephDB affinity towards DYNLL1 and that preventing DYNLL1 from the induction of higher gephyrin oligomers is either advantageous for DYNLL1-mediated reorganization of gephyrin-GlyR clusters or that DYNLL1 exerts possibly two (concentration-dependent) actions on gephyrin.
The gephyrin-collybistin-neuroligin 2 complex was the subject of the third project. Previously, collybistin and gephyrin were observed to mutually trigger their translocation to the postsynaptic membrane, where the disordered cytoplasmic tail of the postsynaptic cell adhesion molecule NL2 (NL2cyt) causes the anchoring of collybistin 2 (CB2) by binding to its SH3 domain, thereby releasing SH3 domain mediated autoinhibiton of CB2 binding to the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate. Critical for this event is the binding of gephyrin to both CB2 and NL2, presumably via GephE.
Following up on these previous studies biochemical data presented in this thesis confirm the formation of the ternary complex. Unexpectedly, analyses by means of native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis pointed to: (1) The existence of a complex containing NL2cyt and CB2 lacking the SH3 domain and consequently an additional NL2 binding site in CB2. (2) Attenuated gephyrin-collybistin complex formation in the presence of the SH3 domain. (3) A requirement for high NL2cyt concentrations (> 30 µM) during the formation of the ternary complex. This might allow for the regulation by other factors such as additional binding partners or posttranslational modifications. Although of preliminary character, these results provide a starting point for future studies, which will hopefully elucidate the interplay between gephyrin, collybistin, NL2 and certain GABAA receptors.
Protein kinase D2 drives chylomicron-mediate lipid transport in the intestine and promotes obesity
(2022)
Obesity and associated metabolic syndrome are growing concerns in modern society due to the negative consequences for human health and well-being. Cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes are only some of the pathologies associated to overweight. Among the main causes are decreased physical activity and food availability and composition. Diets with high content of fat are energy-dense and their overconsumption leads to an energy imbalance, which ultimately promotes energy storage as fat and obesity. Aberrant activation of signalling cascades and hormonal imbalances are characteristic of this disease and members of the Protein Kinase D (PKD) family have been found to be involved in several mechanisms mediating metabolic homeostasis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the role of Protein Kinase D2 (PKD2) in the regulation of metabolism. Our investigation initiated with a mice model for global PKD2 inactivation, which allowed us to prove a direct involvement of this kinase in lipids homeostasis and obesity. Inactivation of PKD2 protected the mice from high-fat diet-induced obesity and improved their response to glucose, insulin and lipids. Furthermore, the results indicated that, even though there were no changes in energy intake or expenditure, inactivation of PKD2 limited the absorption of fat from the intestine and promoted energy excretion in feces. These results were verified in a mice model for specific deletion of intestinal PKD2. These mice not only displayed an improved metabolic fitness but also a healthier gut microbiome profile. In addition, we made use of a small-molecule inhibitor of PKD in order to prove that local inhibition of PKD2 in the intestine was sufficient to inhibit lipid absorption. The usage of the inhibitor not only protected the mice from obesity but also was efficient in avoiding additional body-weight gain after obesity was pre-established in mice. Mechanistically, we determined that PKD2 regulates lipids uptake in enterocytes by phosphorylation of Apolipoprotein A4 (APOA4) and regulation of chylomicron-mediated triglyceride absorption. PKD2 deletion or inactivation increased abundance of APOA4 and decreased the size of chylomicrons and therefore lipids absorption from the diet. Moreover, intestinal activation of PKD2 in human obese patients correlated with higher levels of triglycerides in circulation and a detrimental blood profile. In conclusion, we demonstrated that PKD2 is a key regulator of dietary fat absorption in murine and human context, and its inhibition might contribute to the treatment of obesity.
The nervous system relies on an orchestrated assembly of complex cellular entities called neurons, which are specifically committed to information management and transmission. Inter-neuronal communication takes place via synapses, membrane-membrane junctions which ensure efficient signal transfer. Synaptic neurotransmission involves release of presynaptic neurotransmitters and their reception by cognate receptors at postsynaptic terminals. Inhibitory neurotransmission is primarily mediated by the release of neurotransmitters GABA (γ-Aminobutyric acid) and glycine, which are precisely sensed by GABA type-A receptors (GABAARs) and glycine receptors (GlyRs), respectively. GABAAR assembly and maintenance is coordinated by various postsynaptic neuronal factors including the scaffolding protein gephyrin, the neuronal adaptor collybistin (CB) and cell adhesion proteins of the neuroligin (NL) family, specifically NL2 and NL4.
At inhibitory postsynaptic specializations, gephyrin has been hypothesized to form extended structures underneath the plasma membrane, where its interaction with the receptors leads to their stabilization and impedes their lateral movement. Gephyrin mutations have been associated with various brain disorders, including autism, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, and epilepsy. Furthermore, gephyrin loss is lethal and causes mice to die within the first post-natal day. Gephyrin recruitment from intracellular deposits to postsynaptic membranes primarily relies on the adaptor protein CB.
As a moonlighting protein, CB, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), also catalyzes a nucleotide exchange reaction, thereby regenerating the GTP-bound state of the small GTPase Cdc42 from its GDP-bound form. The CB gene undergoes alternative splicing with the majority of CB splice variants featuring an N-terminal SH3 domain followed by tandem Dbl-homology (DH) and pleckstrin-homology (PH) domains. Previous studies demonstrated that the most widely expressed, SH3-domain containing splice variant (CB2SH3+) preferentially adopts a closed conformation, in which the N-terminally located SH3 domain forms intra-molecular interaction with the DH-PH domain tandem. Previous cell-based studies indicated that SH3 domain-encoding CB variants remain untargeted and colocalize with intracellular gephyrin deposits and hence require additional factors which interact with the SH3 domain, thus inducing an open or active conformation. The SH3 domain-deficient CB isoform (CB2SH3-), on the contrary, adopts an open conformation, which possess enhanced postsynaptic gephyrin-clustering and also effectively replenishes the GTP-bound small GTPase-Cdc42 from its GDP-bound state.
Despite the fundamental role of CB as a neuronal adaptor protein maintaining the proper function of inhibitory GABAergic synapses, its interactions with the neuronal scaffolding protein gephyrin and other post synaptic neuronal factors remain poorly understood. Moreover, CB interaction studies with the small GTPase Cdc42 and TC10, a closely related member of Cdc42 subfamily, remains poorly characterized. Most importantly, the roles of the neuronal factors and small GTPases in CB conformational activation have not been elucidated.
This PhD dissertation primarily focuses on delineating the molecular basis of the interactions between CB and postsynaptic neuronal factors. During the course of my PhD dissertation, I engineered a series of CB FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) sensors to characterize the CB interaction with its binding partners along with outlining their role in CB conformational activation. Through the aid of these CB FRET sensors, I analyzed the gephyrin-CB interaction, which, due to technical limitations remained unaddressed for more than two decades (refer Chapter 2 for more details). Subsequently, I also unraveled the molecular basis of the interactions between CB and the neuronal cell adhesion factor neuroligin 2 (refer chapter 2) and the small GTPases Cdc42 and TC10 (refer chapter 3) and describe how these binding partners induce a conformational activation of CB.
In summary, this PhD dissertation provides strong evidence of a closely knit CB communication network with gephyrin, neuroligin and the small GTPase TC10, wherein CB activation from closed/inactive to open/active states is effectively triggered by these ligands.
Knowing then defeating: The Ubiquitin activating enzyme, a promising target for cancer therapy
(2020)
Ubiquitin is a 76 amino acid long polypeptide, which is present throughout eukaryotes in a highly conserved fashion. Ubiquitin can modify proteins by becoming covalently attached to them. Eukaryotic cells employ ubiquitin to maintain and regulate fundamental cellular processes like protein degradation, the immune response and transcriptional and translational regulation. Transfer of ubiquitin to the substrate is achieved by the catalysis of three classes of enzymes namely E1, E2 and E3. Together these enzymes form a pyramidal hierarchy, where E1 stands at the apex and E3 enzymes form the base of the pathway.
The ubiquitin activating enzyme 1 (UBA1) plays a major role in ubiquitylation being the ubiquitin-dedicated E1 enzyme. In addition, it is the only enzyme in this pathway to use ATP as an energy source to catalyze two important reactions. The products of these reactions, ubiquitin adenylate and ubiquitin thioester, are the essential intermediate states of ubiquitin, for being conjugated to the target protein. With the help of X-ray crystallography and biochemical approaches, snapshots of multiple catalytic states of UBA1, where it is bound to Mg-ATP, ubiquitin and the E2 Ubc13 as substrates could be captured. With the help of these high-resolution crystal structures, deeper insights into the enzymatic mechanism of UBA1 could be attained. The resulting insights into the catalytic cycle were further validated by biochemical assays. It could be shown that ATP acts as a molecular switch to induce the enzyme’s open conformation. Ubiquitin-binding to the enzyme leads to domain rotations, which facilitate the recruitment of a cognate E2 enzyme. The interdomain communication as well as the cross-talk with the substrates and the products fuel the enzymatic cycle of UBA1.
Due to the proven efficacy of proteasome inhibitors for cancer treatment, which block degradation of proteins labeled with ubiquitin, enzymes participating in the ubiquitylation cascade have been targeted by researchers for the development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics. UBA1 inhibition has been shown to preferentially induce cell death in malignant cells, and it can also be used as a strategy to overcome resistance against proteasome inhibitors. MLN7243, an adenosyl sulfamate inhibitor developed by Millenium Pharmaceutical to specifically target UBA1, is currently in Phase-I clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors. UBA1 could be crystallized in complex with three adenosyl sulfamate inhibitors covalently linked to ubiquitin, which are promising drug candidates for cancer therapy. The inhibitors employed, MLN7243, MLN4924 and ABPA3, show distinct specificities towards different E1 enzymes. With the help of crystal structures the specificity determinants of these inhibitors could be deciphered, which were further confirmed by inhibition assays as well as molecular dynamics simulations. Together these crystal structures provide a starting point for developing E1-specific inhibitors, which, besides their potential for medicinal purposes, are important tools to better understand the function of the ubiquitin system as well as the action of ubiquitin-like proteins.