Institut für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Year of publication
- 2019 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- Bedürfnis (1)
- Brustkrebs (1)
- Inanspruchnahme (1)
- Krebs (1)
- Lebensqualität (1)
- Melanom (1)
- Psychoonkologie (1)
- Soziale Unterstützung (1)
- attention (1)
- fear conditioning (1)
Sensory processing and attention allocation are shaped by threat, but the role of trait-anxiety in sensory processing as a function of threat predictability remains incompletely understood. Therefore, we measured steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) as an index of sensory processing of predictable and unpredictable threat cues in 29 low (LA) and 29 high (HA) trait-anxious participants during a modified NPU-paradigm followed by an extinction phase. Three different contextual cues indicated safety (N), predictable (P) or unpredictable threat (U), while foreground cues signalled shocks in the P-condition only. All participants allocated increased attentional resources to the central P-threat cue, replicating previous findings. Importantly, LA individuals exhibited larger ssVEP amplitudes to contextual threat (U and P) than to contextual safety cues, while HA individuals did not differentiate among contextual cues in general. Further, HA exhibited higher aversive ratings of all contexts compared to LA. These results suggest that high trait-anxious individuals might be worse at discriminating contextual threat stimuli and accordingly overestimate the probability and aversiveness of unpredictable threat. These findings support the notion of aberrant sensory processing of unpredictable threat in anxiety disorders, as this processing pattern is already evident in individuals at risk of these disorders.
Introduction
Multidisciplinary, complex rehabilitation interventions are an important part of the treatment of chronic diseases. However, little is known about the effectiveness of routine rehabilitation interventions within the German healthcare system. Due to the nature of the social insurance system in Germany, randomised controlled trials examining the effects of rehabilitation interventions are challenging to implement and scarcely accessible. Consequently, alternative pre-post designs can be employed to assess pre-post effects of medical rehabilitation programmes. We present a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis methods to assess the pre-post effects of rehabilitation interventions in Germany.
Methods and analysis
The respective study will be conducted within the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A systematic literature review will be conducted to identify studies reporting the pre-post effects (start of intervention vs end of intervention or later) in German healthcare. Studies investigating the following disease groups will be included: orthopaedics, rheumatology, oncology, pulmonology, cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology and psychosomatics. The primary outcomes of interest are physical/mental quality of life, physical functioning and social participation for all disease groups as well as pain (orthopaedic and rheumatologic patients only), blood pressure (cardiac patients only), asthma control (patients with asthma only), dyspnoea (patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease only) and depression/anxiety (psychosomatic patients only). We will invite the principal investigators of the identified studies to provide additional individual patient data. We aim to perform the meta-analyses using individual patient data as well as aggregate data. We will examine the effects of both study-level and patient-level moderators by using a meta-regression method.
Ethics and dissemination
Only studies that have received institutional approval from an ethics committee and present anonymised individual patient data will be included in the meta-analysis. The results will be presented in a peer-reviewed publication and at research conferences. A declaration of no objection by the ethics committee of the University of Würzburg is available (number 20180411 01).
Background:
Employees insured in pension insurance, who are incapable of working due to ill health, are entitled to a disability pension. To assess whether an individual meets the medical requirements to be considered as disabled, a work capacity evaluation is conducted. However, there are no official guidelines on how to perform an external quality assurance for this evaluation process. Furthermore, the quality of medical reports in the field of insurance medicine can vary substantially, and systematic evaluations are scarce. Reliability studies using peer review have repeatedly shown insufficient ability to distinguish between high, moderate and low quality. Considering literature recommendations, we developed an instrument to examine the quality of medical experts’reports.
Methods:
The peer review manual developed contains six quality domains (formal structure, clarity, transparency, completeness, medical-scientific principles, and efficiency) comprising 22 items. In addition, a superordinate criterion (survey confirmability) rank the overall quality and usefulness of a report. This criterion evaluates problems of innerlogic and reasoning. Development of the manual was assisted by experienced physicians in a pre-test. We examined the observable variance in peer judgements and reliability as the most important outcome criteria. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, 20 anonymous experts’ reports detailing the work capacity evaluation were reviewed by 19 trained raters (peers). Percentage agreement and Kendall’s W, a reliability measure of concordance between two or more peers, were calculated. A total of 325 reviews were conducted.
Results:
Agreement of peer judgements with respect to the superordinate criterion ranged from 29.2 to 87.5%. Kendall’s W for the quality domain items varied greatly, ranging from 0.09 to 0.88. With respect to the superordinate criterion, Kendall’s W was 0.39, which indicates fair agreement. The results of the percentage agreement revealed systemic peer preferences for certain deficit scale categories.
Conclusion:
The superordinate criterion was not sufficiently reliable. However, in comparison to other reliability studies, this criterion showed an equivalent reliability value. This report aims to encourage further efforts to improve evaluation instruments. To reduce disagreement between peer judgments, we propose the revision of the peer review instrumentand the development and implementation of a standardized rater training to improve reliability.
Ziel der Arbeit war die Untersuchung eines möglichen Zusammenhangs zwischen Lebensqualität bzw. sozialer Unterstützung und dem Bedürfnis nach bzw. der Inanspruchnahme von psychosozialer Unterstützung bei Tumorpatienten.
Die Datenerhebung erfolgte im Rahmen einer deutschlandweiten Multicenterstudie am Studienstandort Würzburg. Eingeschlossen wurden 128 Patienten mit Melanom, gynäkologischen und gastrointestinalen Tumoren. Die Studiendaten wurden mittels Fragebögen erhoben. Hierzu zählten der SF-12-Fragebogen zur Lebensqualität, der SSUK-8-Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung und jeweils ein Fragebogen zum Bedürfnis und zur Inanspruchnahme psychosozialer Unterstützung.
Ein Zusammenhang ergab sich zwischen psychischer Lebensqualität und dem Bedürfnis nach psychosozialer Unterstützung. Patienten, die ein Bedürfnis nach psychosozialer Unterstützung äußerten, wiesen eine signifikant niedrigere psychische Lebensqualität auf. Ebenso konnte ein Zusammenhang zwischen der Inanspruchnahme psychosozialer Unterstützung und der Lebensqualität gesehen werden. Patienten, die psychosoziale Unterstützungsangebote in Anspruch genommen hatten, wiesen eine niedrigere körperliche und psychische Lebensqualität auf.
Es konnten keine Zusammenhänge zwischen positiver sozialer Unterstützung und dem Bedürfnis nach bzw. der Inanspruchnahme von psychosozialer Unterstützung gesehen werden.