Pathologisches Institut
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (15)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (11)
- Journal article (4)
Keywords
- NFATc1 (15) (remove)
Institute
The Nuclear Factors of Activated T cells (NFATs) are critical transcription factors playing major roles in the control of the cell cycle, apoptosis and, probably, also cancerogenesis. Of all the four genuine NFATc family members, NFATc1 has the unique induction property which appears to be essential for T and B cell development, along with its considerable role in cytokine gene expression and function in non-lymphoid tissues and during organ development (such as in the development of muscle and heart cells). A number of studies have proved the potential role of NFATc1 protein in development of lymphomas and leukemias and provided evidence of differential expression of the same gene in different tumours (Suppression in classical Hodgkin lymphomas but overexpression in T-ALLs). Although the most commonly accepted pathway is the dephosphorylation of NFAT by calcineurin upon a rise in intracellular Ca++ leading to nuclear translocation followed by transcription of Il2 gene and related cytokines, it is quite possible that signaling mechanisms other than (or in addition to) calcineurin activation lead to NFATc1 induction as well. One of the major isoforms of NFATc1, NFATc1/αA, is the short inducible factor, produced upon full T and B cell activation. Here we used two different conditional knock-out mice as our study model. Inactivation of the murine Nfatc1 gene in bone marrow (of Cd79a/mb-1-cre x Nfatc1flx/flx mice) and spleen (of Cd23-cre x Nfatc1flx/flx mice) resulted in complete ablation of NFATc1 expression in splenic B cells. Although no severe developmental defects were found for the generation of ‘conventional’ B2 cells, NFATc1 inactivation in bone marrow B-cells led to a strong decrease in the peritoneal B1a cell population. In-vitro studies showed a clear-cut decrease in proliferation and an increase in Activation Induced Cell Death (AICD) of NFATc1-/- splenic B cells upon BCR stimulation. While NFATc1 appears to control directly the AICD of peripheral B cells, further studies revealed an effect of NFATc1 on proliferation by a sustained differentiation program controlling Ca++ flux and calcineurin activity which are needed to maintain transcription and proliferation of primary B cells. Re-expression of NFATc1 at a low dose could protect cells against AICD, whereas at a higher dose it initiated AICD. These data suggest an important dual role of NFATc1 in controlling proliferation and apoptosis of peripheral B lymphocytes. NFATc1 ablation also impaired the Ig class switch to IgG3 by T cell-independent (TI) type II antigens and impaired IgG3+ plasmablast formation when studied in-vivo by NP-Ficoll immunization or in-vitro using an in-vitro class-switch model. Contrary to the immunizations with TI-type II antigen, no significant differences were documented in Ig class switch upon immunization with NP-KLH, a T-cell dependent (TD) antigen. Taken together, the data indicate NFATc1/αA as a crucial player in the activation and function of splenic B cells upon BCR stimulation. Missing or incomplete NFATc1/αA induction appears to be one reason for the generation of B cell unresponsiveness, whereas uncontrolled NFATc1/αA expression could lead to unbalanced immune reactions and autoimmune diseases.
NFAT transcription factors play critical roles in gene transcription during immune responses. Besides regulation of lymphokine promoters in T lymphocytes, NFAT factors are also expressed in other cell types and regulate the activity of numerous genes that control the generation of cardiac septa and valves in embryonic heart, the formation of blood vessels, the outgrowth of neuronal axons and the differentiation of osteoclasts during bone formation [10, 24]. Here we show that the induction of NFATc/αA in effector T cells is controlled by a strong inducible promoter, P1. It results in splicing of exon 1 to exon 3 transcripts and, in concert with the activity of a poly A site downstream of exon 9, leads to the massive synthesis of NFATc/αA in effector Th1 cells. A second, weak promoter, P2, lies in front of exon 2 and directs the synthesis of longer NFAT β isoforms. Both P1 and P2 direct the synthesis of three different RNAs: αA, αB, αC and βA, βB, βC correspondingly. The B and C isoforms arise from alternative splicing and poly A addition at the distal site pA2. P1 but not P2 activity is autoregulated by NFAT factors which bind to two tandemly arranged NFAT sites within P1 and enhance its induction. In resting T cells, the NFATc1/β RNAs are the most prominent nfatc1 transcripts and their synthesis is reduced upon T-cell activation. However, following activation in primary effector T cells or in T-cell lines of human or murine origin, a 15–20-fold induction of NFATc1/αA RNA was detected, whereas only a 2–5-fold increase was observed for the NFATc1/αB or NFATc1/αC RNAs. Optimal induction of P1 promoter require involving of a persistent increase in free cytosolic Ca2+ induced by ionomycin, which stimulates the nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation of all NFATc factors and phorbol esters, which activate protein kinase C and other protein kinase pathways in T cells. This suggests that both TCR and co-receptor signals contribute to give full P1 nfatc1 induction. Because NFATc1/αA induction is unaffected in NFATc2+c3 double-deficient T cells, NFATc1 autoregulates its own synthesis by controlling P1 activity and NFATc1/αA induction. P1 promoter contains tandemly arranged NFAT core binding motif TGGAAA to witch bind monomeric NFATc1 proteins and numerous conservative binding sites of other transcriptional factors like CREB, Fos, ATF-2, Sp1, NF-kB and GATA suggesting complex multi-factor regulation of NFATc1 gene. We also highlight that initial phase of nfatc1 transcription in naive CD4+ T cells is controlled by the promoter P2 which is constitutively active in resting T cells. The activation of resting T cells results in a decrease of P2 and the induction of P1 activity and, under optimal conditions, in the predominant synthesis of NFATc1/αA in effector T cells. In addition to the high concentrations of poly A factors required for optimal pA1 function, the levels of transcription factors, in particular NFATs, must also increase for P1 induction. That could be explained by achievement of certain threshold levels for transcriptional activation. Finally, the altered transactivation potential of NFATc1/αA suggests a specific role for this NFATc1 protein in gene control, such as in Th1 effector cells where NFATc1/αA is synthesized at high concentrations.
In this study, murine ES cells and DT40 B cells were used in parallel to disrupt the Nfatc1 gene and to study the function of individual 6 Nfatc1 isoforms, especially the function of highly inducible NFATc1/aA.We found that the short isoform NFATc1/aA protects DT40 B cells against apoptosis while the long isoform NFATc1/aC appears to enforce apoptosis. DNA microarray studies have shown that in NFATc1" DT40 B cells expressing ectopically human NFATc1/aA, the pkc-theta gene is several fold stronger expressed as in wild type cells. Our results of EMSA (Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays) and ChIP (chromatin immuno-precipitation) experiments demonstrated the binding of NFATc1/aA to the pkc-theta promoter in vitro and in vivo. NF-kappa B was also found to bind to the NFATc1 P1-promoter in vitro and in vivo. These data suggest and further prove that NF-kappa B contributes to the induction of the NFATc1 P1 promoter upon activation of T cells. So, NFATc1/aA and NF-kappa B were found to cross-talk in the transcriptional upregulation of their target genes, such as the IL-2 gene and the Nfatc1 gene itself, at multiple steps upon induction of apoptosis. While the pro-apoptotic mechanism of NFATc1s long isoform(s) remains unclear, its corresponding “death partners” are worth further studies. The elucidation of functional roles of NFATc1s short or long isoforms in the control of apoptosis of lymphocytes helps to understand apoptosis regulation, and thereby, the fate of lymphocytes.
Das murine Blimp1 (B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein) und sein humanes Homolog PRDI-BF1 (positive regulatory domain I binding factor 1) sind als terminale Differenzierungsfaktoren der myeloischen Reihe und der B-Lymphozyten (BCs) beschrieben worden. Über direkte sequenzspezifische Promotorbindung und epigenetische Modifikationen greifen sie größtenteils reprimierend in die Expression einer Vielzahl von Genen ein und werden dabei funktionell mit einer niedrigen Proliferationsrate und einem hohen Grad an Zelldifferenzierung und Apoptose in Zusammenhang gebracht. Im Zuge dieser Arbeit konnte gezeigt werden, dass Blimp1 auch in der zweiten lymphatischen Zellreihe, also in den T-Lymphozyten (TCs) und hier insbesondere in den Subtypen der T-Helfer-2-Zellen (CD4+ TH2), der CD4+ T-Gedächtniszellen (CD4+ TMem) und der regulatorischen TCs (CD4+ CD25+ TReg) exprimiert wird. Die gefundene Blimp1-Expression ist nicht konstitutiv. Vielmehr wird das Blimp1-Gen über T-Zellrezeptorsignale – über die Proteinkinase C (PKC) und den Anstieg freier intrazellulärer Ca2+-Konzentrationen – verstärkend über den Interleukin-6-Rezeptor-pathway, und über die Aktivität des Transkriptionsfaktors C/EBPβ (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein) allein induziert. Die Transaktivierung des TATA-boxlosen Blimp1-Promotors (ca. 1 kb) durch C/EBPβ wird stärker über dessen proximale Hälfte vermittelt, an der jedoch keine direkte Bindung des Transkriptionsfaktors nachzuweisen ist, und scheint somit indirekt zu sein. Im Gegensatz dazu bindet das C/EBPβ-Protein im schwächer transaktivierenden distalen Blimp1-Promotorbereich direkt an eine kombinierte, der P1/Pu-bB-des IL-4-Promotors ähnliche NFAT/C/EBP-Bindungssequenz. Die C/EBP-Bindungsstelle liegt hierbei in direkter Nachbarschaft zum NFAT-(nuclear factor of activated T cells) Bindungsmotiv. Auch NFATc1 bindet direkt, entwickelt aber kein transaktivierendes Potential sondern reprimiert vielmehr die durch C/EBPβ-vermittelte Transaktivierung.
We examined the regulation of NFATc1 in different lymphomas and observed an inversed correlation between the methylation status and expression of NFATc1. Our data demonstrate that aberrant DNA methylation associated with chromatin remodeling within nfatc1 locus is a major mechanism for the repression of NFATc1 expression, suggesting that the DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional silencing of NFATc1 may be a critical event in the tumorogenesis of ALCLs and cHLs. Furthermore, the DNA methylation of human nfatc1 promoter region could be used as a novel biomarker of tumor progression. Our results indicate a close link between the loss of immunoreceptor signaling and NFATc1 expression in human lymphomas. For both ALCLs and cHLs, defects in immunoreceptor signaling have been described which result in a loss of receptor-mediated gene expression programs (Schwering et al., 2003; Bonzheim et al., 2004; Marafioti et al., 2004). In T cells, one indicator gene of these programs appears to be the nfatc1 gene whose expression is controlled by TCR signals (Chuvpilo et al., 2002a). In contrast, in T cells NFATc1 expression is unaffected by TCR signals, and NFATc2 was found to be expressed at normal levels in ALCLs and cHLs (L.K., unpubl. data). Moreover, the activity of NF-kappaB factors which can bind to certain NFAT binding sites and share a distantly-related DNA binding domain with NFATs is strongly elevated in cHL cells (Bargou et al., 1997; Hinz et al., 2001; Hinz et al., 2002) suggesting that NFATs and NF-kappaBs exert very different effects on generation and maintenance of Hodgkin’s lymhomas. However, it should be mentioned that in Burkitt’s and further B cell lymphomas in which NFATc1 proteins are strongly expressed and controlled by receptor signals (Kondo et al., 2003), they could exert a promoting function in tumor development. The genes of p53 family members p63 and p73 are prominent examples for mammalian genes whose products can act both as oncoproteins and tumor suppressor genes (Hibi et al., 2000; Stiewe and Putzer, 2002), and it is likely that more genes exist which encode both tumor suppressors and oncoproteins. It remains to be shown whether the nfatc1 gene is one of them.