Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie
Refine
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (203)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Journal article (129)
- Doctoral Thesis (73)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- melanoma (22)
- Melanom (16)
- Merkel cell carcinoma (15)
- Apoptosis (6)
- psoriasis (6)
- therapy (6)
- Allergie (5)
- PD-1 (5)
- Zellmigration (5)
- allergy (5)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie (203)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (13)
- Pathologisches Institut (12)
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II (11)
- Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie (5)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (5)
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (4)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) (4)
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik (4)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (3)
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of therapeutics, with twelve FDA- and EMA-approved drugs for hematological and solid cancers. Such drugs consist in a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxic agent, allowing a specific cytotoxicity to tumor cells. In recent years, tremendous progress has been observed in therapeutic approaches for advanced skin cancer patients. In this regard, targeted therapies (e.g., kinase inhibitors) or immune checkpoint-blocking antibodies outperformed conventional chemotherapy, with proven benefit to survival. Nevertheless, primary and acquired resistances as well as adverse events remain limitations of these therapies. Therefore, ADCs appear as an emerging therapeutic option in oncodermatology. After providing an overview of ADC design and development, the goal of this article is to review the potential ADC indications in the field of oncodermatology.
Outcome of a de-labelling algorithm compared with results of penicillin (β-lactam) allergy testing
(2022)
Background
Penicillin allergy labels frequently impede guideline-directed treatment with a penicillin or other β-lactam antibiotics. Despite presumed allergy, targeted questioning may indicate a low probability of sensitization and permit reasonably safe administration of the antibiotic in question. In this study, we evaluated a standardized algorithm aiming to differentiate non-allergic patients from those with true allergic β-lactam hypersensitivity.
Methods
We retrospectively applied a de-labelling algorithm in 800 consecutive patients with suspected β-lactam hypersensitivity. All had undergone complete allergy work-up permitting to definitely exclude or diagnose β-lactam allergy between 2009 and 2019.
Results
In 595 (74.4%) out of 800 cases evaluated, β-lactam allergy could be excluded by negative challenge testing. IgE-mediated anaphylaxis was diagnosed in 70 (8.7%) patients, delayed-type hypersensitivity in 135 (16.9%). In 62 (88.6%) anaphylaxis cases, the algorithm correctly advised to use an alternative antibiotic. Accuracy was higher in patients with moderate to severe anaphylaxis (97.7%) compared to those with a history of mild reactions (73.1%). The algorithm correctly identified 122 (90.4%) patients with proven delayed-type hypersensitivity. It permitted de-labelling in 330 (55.5%) out of 595 patients with diagnostic exclusion of penicillin hypersensitivity, but failed to identify the remaining 265 (44.5%) as low-risk cases.
Conclusions
The algorithm detected 89.8% of cases with penicillin (β-lactam) allergy, sensitivity was optimal for moderate to severe anaphylaxis. Study data justify the implementation of a standardized de-labelling algorithm under close supervision in order to permit guideline-directed treatment and reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics as part of an antibiotic stewardship program.
Simple Summary
In melanoma patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, dose reductions and treatment discontinuations related to adverse events (AE) occur frequently. However, the associations between patient characteristics, AE, and exposure are unclear. Our prospective study analyzed serum (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib exposure and investigated its association with toxicity and patient characteristics. Additionally, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed, and a model to convert capillary blood concentrations to serum concentrations was developed. (Hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or AE. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with lower trough concentrations of trametinib but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. The applicability of the self-sampling of capillary blood was demonstrated. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum exposure from micro-samples. The monitoring of dabrafenib and trametinib may be useful for dose modification and can be optimized by at-home sampling and our new conversion model.
Abstract
Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF\(^{V600}\)-mutant melanoma often experience dose reductions and treatment discontinuations. Current knowledge about the associations between patient characteristics, adverse events (AE), and exposure is inconclusive. Our study included 27 patients (including 18 patients for micro-sampling). Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure was prospectively analyzed, and the relevant patient characteristics and AE were reported. Their association with the observed concentrations and Bayesian estimates of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib were investigated. Further, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-informed conversion model was developed to derive serum PK parameters from self-sampled capillary blood. Results showed that (hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or toxicity. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with significantly lower trough concentrations of trametinib (p = 0.027) but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. Self-sampling of capillary blood was feasible for use in routine care. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum PK parameters from micro-samples. Findings do not support a general recommendation for monitoring dabrafenib and trametinib but suggest that monitoring can facilitate making decisions about dosage adjustments. To this end, micro-sampling and the newly developed conversion model may be useful for estimating precise PK parameters.
Background: Eosinophils appear to contribute to the efficacy of immunotherapy and their frequency was suggested as a predictive biomarker. Whether this observation could be transferred to patients treated with targeted therapy remains unknown. Methods: Blood and serum samples of healthy controls and 216 patients with advanced melanoma were prospectively and retrospectively collected. Freshly isolated eosinophils were phenotypically characterized by flow cytometry and co-cultured in vitro with melanoma cells to assess cytotoxicity. Soluble serum markers and peripheral blood counts were used for correlative studies. Results: Eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, as well as phenotypic characteristics, were similar when comparing healthy donors and patients. However, high relative pre-treatment eosinophil counts were significantly associated with response to MAPKi (p = 0.013). Eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells is dose-dependent and requires proximity of eosinophils and their target in vitro. Treatment with targeted therapy in the presence of eosinophils results in an additive tumoricidal effect. Additionally, melanoma cells affected eosinophil phenotype upon co-culture. Conclusion: High pre-treatment eosinophil counts in advanced melanoma patients were associated with a significantly improved response to MAPKi. Functionally, eosinophils show potent cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, which can be reinforced by MAPKi. Further studies are needed to unravel the molecular mechanisms of our observations.
Background: Rhabdoid melanoma is a rare variant of malignant melanoma with characteristic cytomorphologic features. Due to the potential loss of conventional melanocytic markers, histopathologic diagnosis is often challenging. We hypothesize that immunostaining for PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) might have the potential to uncover the melanocytic origin of these dedifferentiated tumors. Methods: Four cases of rhabdoid primary melanomas were assessed by immunohistochemistry for expression of PRAME and conventional melanocytic markers. Immunohistochemical expression patterns were analyzed in the rhabdoid primaries and, if available, associated metastases. Results: All four cases of rhabdoid primary melanomas showed a strong nuclear positivity for PRAME, while the expression of conventional melanocytic markers S100, MART-1, SOX-10 and HMB-45 was variable between the analyzed cases. Conclusions: In summary, we report four cases of rhabdoid primary melanoma with high to intermediate expression of PRAME despite the partial and variable loss of other melanocytic markers. Hence, PRAME might facilitate the recognition of this highly aggressive entity to avoid misdiagnosis due to histopathologic pitfalls.
Trotz der ursprünglichen Bezeichnung der Acne inversa als "hidrosadénite phlegmoneuse", die eine inflammatorische Fehlfunktion der apokrinen Schweißdrüsen impliziert, geriet die Rolle der Schweißdrüsen hinsichtlich der Pathogenese der AI in Vergessenheit. Ziel dieser Studie war die Evaluierung der Rolle der Schweißdrüsen im Hinblick auf die für die AI charakteristischen proinflammatorischen Mediatoren. Zu diesem Zweck wurden gravimetrische Schweißmessungen, Multiplex-Zytokin-Assays von Schweißproben, sowie immunfluoreszenzoptische Zytokin-/Chemokin-Untersuchungen von läsionaler AI-Haut durchgeführt. Die gravimetrische Untersuchung von 17 AI-Patienten zeigte, dass AI nicht mit Hyperhidrose assoziiert ist. Allerdings scheinen sich AI-Patienten durch ihr Schwitzen im Vergleich zu einer gesunden Kontrollgruppe subjektiv stärker beeinträchtigt zu fühlen. Unsere Daten zeigen eine komplexe proinflammatorische Signatur im AI-Schweiß, die durch eine signifikant erhöhte Konzentration von Monozyten-Chemoattraktant-Protein-1 (MCP-1), Interleukin-8 (CXCL8) und Interferon-γ gekennzeichnet ist. Passend dazu konnten wir eine erhöhte Expression dieser Mediatoren in apokrinen Schweißdrüsen läsionaler AI-Haut nachweisen. Diese Ergebnisse werfen ein neues Licht auf die proinflammatorische Kapazität apokriner Schweißdrüsen bei AI, was zu einem Überdenken der Rolle der Schweißdrüsen im Hinblick auf die Pathogenese der AI führen kann.
Forkhead box O (FoxO) transcription factors are conserved proteins involved in the regulation of life span and age-related diseases, such as diabetes and cancer. Stress stimuli or growth factor deprivation promotes nuclear localization and activation of FoxO proteins, which—depending on the cellular context—can lead to cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. In endothelial cells (ECs), they further regulate angiogenesis and may promote inflammation and vessel destabilization implicating a role of FoxOs in vascular diseases. In several cancers, FoxOs exert a tumor-suppressive function by regulating proliferation and survival. We and others have previously shown that FoxOs can regulate these processes via two different mechanisms: by direct binding to forkhead-responsive elements at the promoter of target genes or by a poorly understood alternative process that does not require direct DNA binding and regulates key targets in primary human ECs. Here, we performed an interaction study in ECs to identify new nuclear FoxO3 interaction partners that might contribute to FoxO-dependent gene regulation. Mass spectrometry analysis of FoxO3-interacting proteins revealed transformation/transcription domain–associated protein (TRRAP), a member of multiple histone acetyltransferase complexes, as a novel binding partner of FoxO family proteins. We demonstrate that TRRAP is required to support FoxO3 transactivation and FoxO3-dependent G1 arrest and apoptosis in ECs via transcriptional activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27\(^{kip1}\) and the proapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 family member, BIM. Moreover, FoxO–TRRAP interaction could explain FoxO-induced alternative gene regulation via TRRAP-dependent recruitment to target promoters lacking forkhead-responsive element sequences.
IgG3 is the IgG subclass with the strongest effector functions among all four IgG subclasses and the highest degree of allelic variability among all constant immunoglobulin genes. Due to its genetic position, IgG3 is often the first isotype an antibody switches to before IgG1 or IgG4. Compared with the other IgG subclasses, it has a reduced half-life which is probably connected to a decreased affinity to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). However, a few allelic variants harbor an amino acid replacement of His435 to Arg that reverts the half-life of the resulting IgG3 to the same level as the other IgG subclasses. Because of its functional impact, we hypothesized that the p.Arg435His variation could be associated with susceptibility to autoantibody-mediated diseases like pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and bullous pemphigoid (BP). Using a set of samples from German, Turkish, Egyptian, and Iranian patients and controls, we were able to demonstrate a genetic association of the p.Arg435His variation with PV risk, but not with BP risk. Our results suggest a hitherto unknown role for the function of IgG3 in the pathogenesis of PV.
Background:
Interferon (IFN) beta drugs have been approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) for more than 20years and are considered to offer a favourable benefit-risk profile. In July 2014, subcutaneous (SC) peginterferon beta-1a 125g dosed every 2weeks, a pegylated form of interferon beta-1a, was approved by the EMA for the treatment of adult patients with RRMS and in August 2014 by the FDA for RMS. Peginterferon beta-1a shows a prolonged half-life and increased systemic drug exposure resulting in a reduced dosing frequency compared to other available interferon-based products in MS. In the Phase 3 ADVANCE trial peginterferon beta-1a demonstrated significant positive effects on clinical and MRI outcome measures versus placebo after one year. Furthermore, in the ATTAIN extension study, sustained efficacy with long-term treatment for nearly 6years was shown.
Main text
In July 2016, an interdisciplinary panel of German and Austrian experts convened to discuss the management of side effects associated with peginterferon beta-1a and other interferon beta-based treatments in MS in daily practice. The panel was composed of experts from university hospitals and private clinics comprised of neurologists, dermatologists, and an MS nurse. In this paper we report recommendations regarding best practices for adverse event management, focussing on peginterferon beta-1a. Injection site reactions (ISRs) and influenza-like illness are the most common adverse effects of interferon beta therapies and can present a burden for MS patients leading to non-adherence and discontinuation of therapy. Peginterferon beta-1a shows improved pharmacological properties. In clinical trials, the adverse event (AE) profile of peginterferon beta-1a was similar to other interferon beta formulations. The most common AEs were mild to moderate ISRs, influenza-like illness, pyrexia, and headache. Current information on the underlying cause of skin reactions associated with SC interferon treatment, and the management strategies for these AEs are limited. In pivotal trials, ISRs were mainly characterized and classified by neurologists, while dermatologists were only rarely consulted.
Conclusions
This report addresses expert recommendations on the management of most relevant adverse effects related to peginterferon beta-1a and other interferon betas, based on literature and interdisciplinary experience.
Despite accounting for only a small proportion of all skin cancers, malignant melanoma
displays a serious health risk with increasing incidence and high mortality rate. Fortunately,
advances in the treatment of malignant melanoma now prolong survival and enhance response
and treatment efficacy. Established biomarkers help evaluate disease progression and
facilitate choosing appropriate and individual treatment options. However, the need for easily
accessible and reliable biomarkers is rising to predict patient-specific clinical outcome.
Eosinophil infiltration into the tumor and high peripheral eosinophil counts prior and during
treatment have been associated with better response in patients for various cancer entities,
including melanoma. An analysis of a heterogeneous study cohort reported high serum ECP
levels in non-responders. Hence, eosinophil frequency and serum ECP as a soluble
eosinophil-secreted mediator were suggested as prognostic biomarkers in melanoma. We
examined whether melanoma patients treated with first-line targeted therapy could also benefit
from the effects of eosinophils. In total, 243 blood and serum samples from patients with
advanced melanoma were prospectively and retrospectively collected before and after drug
initiation. To link eosinophil function to improved clinical outcome, soluble serum markers and
peripheral blood counts were used for correlative studies using a homogeneous study cohort.
In addition, functional and phenotypical characterizations provided insights into the expression
profile and activity of freshly isolated eosinophils, including comparisons between patients and
healthy donors.
Our data showed a significant correlation between high pre-treatment blood eosinophil counts
and improved response to targeted therapy and by trend to combinatorial immunotherapy in
patients with metastatic melanoma. In accordance with previous studies our results links
eosinophil blood counts to better response in melanoma patients. High pre-treatment ECP
serum concentration correlated with response to immunotherapy but not to targeted therapy.
Eosinophils from healthy donors and patients showed functional and phenotypical similarities.
Functional assays revealed a strong cytotoxic potential of blood eosinophils towards
melanoma cells in vitro, inducing apoptosis and necrosis. In addition, in vitro cytotoxicity was
an active process of peripheral eosinophils and melanoma cells with bidirectional features and
required close cell-cell interaction. The extent of cytotoxicity was dose-dependent and showed
susceptibility to changes in physical factors like adherence. Importantly, we provide evidence
of an additive tumoricidal function of eosinophils and combinatorial targeted therapy in vitro. In
summary, we give valuable insights into the complex and treatment-dependent role of
eosinophils in melanoma. As a result, our data support the suggestion of eosinophils and their
secreted mediators as potential prognostic biomarkers. It will take additional studies to
examine the molecular mechanisms that underlie our findings.