Abteilung für Parodontologie (in der Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie)
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Year of publication
- 2021 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Journal article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- Lithium-Disilikat-verstärkte Keramik (1)
- Transmissionsgrad (1)
- alveolar ridge augmentation (1)
- animal study (1)
- bacterial counts (1)
- bone augmentation (1)
- bone substitutes (1)
- collagen membranes (1)
- degradation profile (1)
- dental implants (1)
Diese Studie untersucht den Transmissionsgrad von sichtbarem blauem Licht durch Lithium-Disilikat-verstärkte Keramik in Abhängigkeit von der Schichtstärke, Farbe und Transluzenz. Weiterhin wurde der Einfluss der Oberflächenbehandlung sowie des Zwischenmediums zwischen Lichtleiter und Keramikoberfläche untersucht. Dazu wurden plane Proben mit einer Schichtstärke von 1,25 mm, 2,5 mm, 5 mm, 7,5 mm der Keramik IPS e.max CAD und mit einem Sägemikrotom gesägt und anschließend kristallisiert. Die Messung des Transmissionsgrades des Lichtes eines LED-Lichtgerätes erfolgte mit einem faseroptischen Spektralfotometer. Je dicker, opaker und dunkler eine Keramikprobe ist, desto geringer ist ihr Transmissionsgrad. Die Abnahme des Transmissionsgrades konnte durch das Lambert-Beer‘sche-Gesetz beschrieben werden. Der Einfluss der Reflexion und / oder Streuung an der Oberfläche muss als Absorptionsgrad α miteinbezogen werden. Der Absorptionsgrad α ist von der Oberflächenbehandlung und dem Medium zwischen Lichtleiter und Keramikoberfläche abhängig. Die Durchführung einer multiplen linearen Regressionsanalyse zeigt, dass die Schichtstärke, Transluzenz, Helligkeitsstufen und die Farben einen signifikanten Einfluss auf den Transmissionsgrad haben. Den stärksten Einfluss hat die Keramikschichtstärke. Der Transmissionsgrad der Farben B und D unterscheidet sich nicht signifikant vom Transmissionsgrad der Farbe A. Dagegen weist die Keramik der Farbe Bleach einen signifikant höheren und die Keramik der Farbe C einen signifikant niedrigeren Transmissionsgrad auf. Der Absorptionsgrad der glasierten Oberfläche und der Absorptionsgrad bei Belichtung durch die Zwischenmedien ist im Vergleich zum Absorptionsgrad einer gesägten Oberfläche, bzw. bei Belichtung ohne Zwischenmedium signifikant niedriger. Dagegen ist der Unterschied des Absorptionsgrades der polierten Oberfläche zum Absorptionsgrad der gesägten Oberfläche bei Mittelung der Versuche ohne bzw. mit Zwischenmedien knapp nicht signifikant.
Objectives
This systematic review assessed the influence of soft tissue augmentation procedures on marginal bone level changes in partial or fully edentulous patients.
Material and Methods
We identified three relevant PICO questions related to soft tissue augmentation procedures and conducted a systematic search of four major electronic databases for clinical studies in systemically healthy patients receiving at least one dental implant and a minimum follow-up of one year after implant placement. The primary outcome was mean difference in marginal bone levels, and secondary outcomes were clinical and patient-related outcomes such as thickness of peri-implant mucosa, bleeding indices, and Pink Esthetic Score.
Results
We identified 20 publications reporting on 16 relevant comparisons. Studies varied considerably and thus only two meta-analyses could be performed. This systematic review showed that:
Soft tissue augmentation either for augmentation of keratinized mucosa or soft tissue volume inconsistently had an effect on marginal bone level changes when compared to no soft tissue augmentation, but consistently improved secondary outcomes.
The combination soft and hard tissue augmentation showed no statistically significant difference in terms of marginal bone level changes when compared to hard tissue augmentation alone, but resulted in less marginal soft tissue recession as shown by a meta-analysis.
Soft or hard tissue augmentation performed as contour augmentations resulted in comparable marginal bone level changes.
Conclusions
Peri-implant soft and hard tissues seem to have a bidirectional relationship: “Bone stands hard, but soft tissue is the guard”.
Various biomaterial combinations have been studied focusing on their ability to stabilize blood clots and maintain space under soft tissue to support new bone formation. A popular combination is Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) placed with a native collagen membrane (NCM) tacked to native bone. In this study, we compared the outcome of this treatment option to those achieved with three different graft/membrane combinations with respect to total newly occupied area and the mineralized compound inside. After bi-lateral extraction of two mandibular premolars in five adult beagles L-shaped alveolar defects were created. A total of 20 defects healed for 6 weeks resulting in chronic type bone defects. At baseline, four options were randomly allocated to five defects each: a. DBBM + NCM with a four-pin fixation across the ridge; b. DBBM + RCLC (ribose cross-linked collagen membrane); c. DBBM + NPPM (native porcine pericardium membrane); and d. Ca-sulfate (CS) + RCLC membrane. Membranes in b/c/d were not fixed; complete tensionless wound closure was achieved by CAF. Termination after 3 months and sampling followed, and non-decalcified processing and toluidine blue staining were applied. Microscopic images obtained at standardized magnification were histomorphometrically assessed by ImageJ software (NIH). An ANOVA post hoc test was applied; histomorphometric data are presented in this paper as medians and interquartile ranges (IRs). All sites healed uneventfully, all sites were sampled and block separation followed before Technovit embedding. Two central sections per block for each group were included. Two of five specimen were lost due to processing error and were excluded from group b. New bone area was significantly greater for option b. compared to a. (p = 0.001), c. (p = 0.002), and d. (p = 0.046). Residual non-bone graft area was significantly less for option d. compared to a. (p = 0.026) or c. (p = 0.021). We conclude that collagen membranes with a prolonged resorption/barrier profile combined with bone substitutes featuring different degradation profiles sufficiently support new bone formation. Tacking strategy/membrane fixation appears redundant when using these biomaterials.
Objectives
To investigate plaque inhibition of 0.1% octenidine mouthwash (OCT) vs. placebo over 5 days in the absence of mechanical plaque control.
Materials and methods
For this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center phase 3 study, 201 healthy adults were recruited. After baseline recording of plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI), collection of salivary samples, and dental prophylaxis, subjects were randomly assigned to OCT or placebo mouthwash in a 3:1 ratio. Rinsing was performed twice daily for 30 s. Colony forming units in saliva were determined before and after the first rinse. At day 5, PI, GI, and tooth discoloration index (DI) were assessed. Non-parametric van Elteren tests were applied with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results
Treatment with OCT inhibited plaque formation more than treatment with placebo (PI: 0.36 vs. 1.29; p < 0.0001). OCT reduced GI (0.04 vs. placebo 0.00; p = 0.003) and salivary bacterial counts (2.73 vs. placebo 0.24 lgCFU/ml; p < 0.0001). Tooth discoloration was slightly higher under OCT (DI: 0.25 vs. placebo 0.00; p = 0.0011). Mild tongue staining and dysgeusia occurred.
Conclusions
OCT 0.1% mouthwash inhibits plaque formation over 5 days. It therefore can be recommended when regular oral hygiene is temporarily compromised.
Clinical relevance
When individual plaque control is compromised, rinsing with octenidine mouthwash is recommended to maintain healthy oral conditions while side effects are limited.