• search hit 22 of 266
Back to Result List

Ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT in cadaveric fracture models: spatial frequency is not everything

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319281
  • In this study, the impact of reconstruction sharpness on the visualization of the appendicular skeleton in ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) CT was investigated. Sixteen cadaveric extremities (eight fractured) were examined with a standardized 120 kVp scan protocol (CTDI\(_{vol}\) 10 mGy). Images were reconstructed with the sharpest non-UHR kernel (Br76) and all available UHR kernels (Br80 to Br96). Seven radiologists evaluated image quality and fracture assessability. Interrater agreement was assessed with theIn this study, the impact of reconstruction sharpness on the visualization of the appendicular skeleton in ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) CT was investigated. Sixteen cadaveric extremities (eight fractured) were examined with a standardized 120 kVp scan protocol (CTDI\(_{vol}\) 10 mGy). Images were reconstructed with the sharpest non-UHR kernel (Br76) and all available UHR kernels (Br80 to Br96). Seven radiologists evaluated image quality and fracture assessability. Interrater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. For quantitative comparisons, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs) were calculated. Subjective image quality was best for Br84 (median 1, interquartile range 1–3; p ≤ 0.003). Regarding fracture assessability, no significant difference was ascertained between Br76, Br80 and Br84 (p > 0.999), with inferior ratings for all sharper kernels (p < 0.001). Interrater agreement for image quality (0.795, 0.732–0.848; p < 0.001) and fracture assessability (0.880; 0.842–0.911; p < 0.001) was good. SNR was highest for Br76 (3.4, 3.0–3.9) with no significant difference to Br80 and Br84 (p > 0.999). Br76 and Br80 produced higher SNRs than all kernels sharper than Br84 (p ≤ 0.026). In conclusion, PCD-CT reconstructions with a moderate UHR kernel offer superior image quality for visualizing the appendicular skeleton. Fracture assessability benefits from sharp non-UHR and moderate UHR kernels, while ultra-sharp reconstructions incur augmented image noise.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Theresa Sophie Patzer, Andreas Steven Kunz, Henner Huflage, Nora Conrads, Karsten Sebastian Luetkens, Pauline Pannenbecker, Mila Marie Paul, Süleyman Ergün, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Jan-Peter Grunz
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319281
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie (Institut für Röntgendiagnostik)
Medizinische Fakultät / Institut für Anatomie und Zellbiologie
Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II)
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Diagnostics
ISSN:2075-4418
Year of Completion:2023
Volume:13
Issue:10
Article Number:1677
Source:Diagnostics (2023) 13:10, 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101677
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101677
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:X-ray computed; cancellous bone; convolution kernel; fracture; photon-counting; tomography
Release Date:2024/01/30
Date of first Publication:2023/05/09
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International