Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (16)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (16)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (16)
Keywords
- Arzneimitteldesign (2)
- Aurora-A (2)
- Gephyrin (2)
- Protein-Protein-Wechselwirkung (2)
- Wirkstoffdesign (2)
- gephyrin (2)
- p97 (2)
- 7,8-Dihydroxyflavon (1)
- 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (1)
- Actin cytoskeleton-related protein (1)
Institute
- Graduate School of Life Sciences (15)
- Rudolf-Virchow-Zentrum (5)
- Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie (1)
- Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (1)
- Institut für Pharmazie und Lebensmittelchemie (1)
- Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1)
- Lehrstuhl für Biochemie (1)
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (1)
Ubiquitylation is a protein post translational modification, in which ubiquitin is covalently attached to target protein substrates resulting in diverse cellular outcomes. Besides ubiquitin, various ubiquitin-like proteins including FAT10 exist, which are also conjugated to target proteins. The underlying modification mechanisms are conserved. In the initial step, ubiquitin or a ubiquitin-like protein is thioester-linked to a catalytic cysteine in the E1activating enzyme in an ATP-dependent manner. The respective protein modifier is then transferred to an E2 conjugating enzyme in a transthioesterification reaction. Finally, an E3 ubiquitin ligase E3 catalyzes the covalent attachment of the protein modifier to a substrate. In the case of ubiquitin, multiple ubiquitin molecules can be attached to a substrate in the form of either linear or branched polyubiquitin chains but also as single ubiquitin modifications. Depending on the nature of the ubiquitin chain, the substrates are destined to various cellular processes such as their targeted destruction by the proteasome but also non-degradative outcomes may occur.
As stated above FAT10 is a ubiquitin-like protein modifier which typically targets proteins for proteasomal degradation. It consists of two ubiquitin-like domains and is mainly expressed in cells of the human immune system. The reported involvement of FAT10 modifications in cancers and other diseases has caught the attention of the scientific community as an inhibition of the FAT10ylation process may provide avenues for novel therapeutic approaches. UBA6 is the E1 activating enzyme that resides at the apex of the FAT10 proteasomal degradation pathway. UBA6 not only recognizes FAT10 but can also activate ubiquitin as efficiently as the ubiquitin specific E1 UBA1. The dual specificity of UBA6 may complicate the inhibition FAT10ylation since targeting the active site of UBA6 will also inhibit the UBA6-catalyzed ubiquitin activation. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying principles for the dual specificity of UBA6 prior to the development of compounds interfering with FAT10ylation.
In this thesis important novel insights into the structure and function of UBA6 were derived by X-ray crystallography and biochemical methods. The first crystal structure of UBA6 reveals the multidomain architecture of this enzyme in atomic detail. The enzyme is composed of a rigid core including its active and inactive adenylation domains as well as a 4 helix bundle. Overall, the molecule adopts a “Y” shape architecture with the core at the base and the first and second catalytic half domains forming one arm of the “Y” and the ubiquitin fold domain constituting the other arm. While UBA6 shares the same domain architecture as UBA1, substantial differences were revealed by the crystal structure. In particular, the first catalytic half domain undergoes a significant shift to a position more distal from the core. This rigid body movement is assumed to generate room to accommodate the second ubiquitin-like domain of FAT10. Differences are also observed in a hydrophobic platform between the core and the first catalytic half domain and the adenylation active site in the core, which together from the binding sites for ubiquitin and FAT10. Site directed mutagenesis of key residues in these areas altered the UBA6-catalyzed activation of ubiquitin and FAT10. UBA6 variants were generated with the goal of trying to block the activation of FAT10 while still maintaining that of ubiquitin activation, in order to fully explain the dual specificity of UBA6. However, none of these mutations could block the activation of FAT10, while some of these UBA6 variants blocked ubiquitin activation. Preliminary inhibition assays with a group of E1 inhibitors belonging to the adenosyl sulfamate family demonstrated potent inhibition of FAT10ylation for two compounds. The dual specificity of UBA6 hence needs to be further examined by biochemical and structural methods. In particular, the structure of a complex between UBA6 and ubiquitin or FAT10 would provide key insights for further biochemical studies, ultimately allowing the targeted inhibition of the FAT10ylation machinery.
Knowing then defeating: The Ubiquitin activating enzyme, a promising target for cancer therapy
(2020)
Ubiquitin is a 76 amino acid long polypeptide, which is present throughout eukaryotes in a highly conserved fashion. Ubiquitin can modify proteins by becoming covalently attached to them. Eukaryotic cells employ ubiquitin to maintain and regulate fundamental cellular processes like protein degradation, the immune response and transcriptional and translational regulation. Transfer of ubiquitin to the substrate is achieved by the catalysis of three classes of enzymes namely E1, E2 and E3. Together these enzymes form a pyramidal hierarchy, where E1 stands at the apex and E3 enzymes form the base of the pathway.
The ubiquitin activating enzyme 1 (UBA1) plays a major role in ubiquitylation being the ubiquitin-dedicated E1 enzyme. In addition, it is the only enzyme in this pathway to use ATP as an energy source to catalyze two important reactions. The products of these reactions, ubiquitin adenylate and ubiquitin thioester, are the essential intermediate states of ubiquitin, for being conjugated to the target protein. With the help of X-ray crystallography and biochemical approaches, snapshots of multiple catalytic states of UBA1, where it is bound to Mg-ATP, ubiquitin and the E2 Ubc13 as substrates could be captured. With the help of these high-resolution crystal structures, deeper insights into the enzymatic mechanism of UBA1 could be attained. The resulting insights into the catalytic cycle were further validated by biochemical assays. It could be shown that ATP acts as a molecular switch to induce the enzyme’s open conformation. Ubiquitin-binding to the enzyme leads to domain rotations, which facilitate the recruitment of a cognate E2 enzyme. The interdomain communication as well as the cross-talk with the substrates and the products fuel the enzymatic cycle of UBA1.
Due to the proven efficacy of proteasome inhibitors for cancer treatment, which block degradation of proteins labeled with ubiquitin, enzymes participating in the ubiquitylation cascade have been targeted by researchers for the development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics. UBA1 inhibition has been shown to preferentially induce cell death in malignant cells, and it can also be used as a strategy to overcome resistance against proteasome inhibitors. MLN7243, an adenosyl sulfamate inhibitor developed by Millenium Pharmaceutical to specifically target UBA1, is currently in Phase-I clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors. UBA1 could be crystallized in complex with three adenosyl sulfamate inhibitors covalently linked to ubiquitin, which are promising drug candidates for cancer therapy. The inhibitors employed, MLN7243, MLN4924 and ABPA3, show distinct specificities towards different E1 enzymes. With the help of crystal structures the specificity determinants of these inhibitors could be deciphered, which were further confirmed by inhibition assays as well as molecular dynamics simulations. Together these crystal structures provide a starting point for developing E1-specific inhibitors, which, besides their potential for medicinal purposes, are important tools to better understand the function of the ubiquitin system as well as the action of ubiquitin-like proteins.
Die Interaktion des onkogenen Transkriptionsfaktors MYCN mit der Ser/Thr Kinase Aurora-A verhindert
dessen Abbau über das Ubiquitin Proteasomsystem indem die Rekrutierung des SCF FbxW7 Komplexes
verhindert wird. Die Kinase nimmt mit der Bindung an MYCN eine aktive Konformation ein und erhält
somit die Fähigkeit zur Kinaseaktivität ohne die sonst notwendige Phosphorylierung von Thr288 oder
die Anwesenheit eines Aktivators wie TPX2. Da hohe MYCN Konzentrationen Tumore wie
Neuroblastome antreiben, ist die Störung der Komplexbildung mit Aurora-A eine valide Strategie zur
Entwicklung von Chemotherapeutika. Einige Inhibitoren von Aurora-A wie Alisertib (MLN8237) sind in
der Lage, eine Konformationsänderung in der Kinase zu verursachen, die mit der Bindung von MYCN
inkompatibel ist und auf diese Weise den Abbau des Transkriptionsfaktors induziert. Da Aurora-A
wichtige Funktionen in der Mitose übernimmt, könnte eine direkte Adressierung des Komplexes anstelle
einer systemischen Inhibition der Kinase vielversprechender sein.
Ziel des Projektes war die Identifizierung von Molekülen, die selektiv an das Interface des
Aurora-A – MYCN Komplexes binden und weiter optimiert werden können, um einen gezielten Abbau
des Transkriptionsfaktors über einen PROTAC Ansatz zu ermöglichen. Virtuelle Screenings und
molekulardynamische Simulationen wurden durchgeführt, um kommerziell erhältliche Verbindungen zu
identifizieren, welche mit einer Bindetasche des Komplexes interagieren, die nur zustande kommt, wenn
beide Proteine miteinander interagieren. Aus einem ersten Set von zehn potentiellen Liganden wurde
für vier eine selektive Interaktion mit dem Protein – Protein Komplex gegenüber Aurora-A oder MYCN
alleine in STD-NMR Experimenten bestätigt. Zwei der Hits besaßen ein identisches Grundgerüst und
wurden als Ausganspunkt für die Optimierung zu potenteren Liganden genutzt. Das Gerüst wurde
fragmentweise vergrößert und in Richtung besserer in-silico Ergebnisse und Funktionalisierung zur
Anbringung von E3-Ligase-Liganden optimiert. Neun dieser Liganden der zweiten Generation wurden
synthetisiert.
Um quantitative Bindungsdaten zu erhalten, wurde ein kovalent verknüpftes Aurora-A – MYCN
Konstrukt entworfen. Die strukturelle und funktionale Integrität wurde in STD-NMR und BLI
Experimenten mit bekannten Aurora-A Inhibitoren bestätigt, sowie in NMR-basierten ATPase Assays.
Zusätzlich konnte die Kristallstruktur des Konstrukts gelöst und damit die Validität des Designs bestätigt
werden. Quantitative Messungen der synthetisierten Moleküle identifizierten HD19S als Hit mit einer
zehnfach höheren Affinität für das Aurora-A – MYCN Konstrukt im Vergleich zu der Kinase allein.
Zusätzlich wurden in-silico Untersuchungen zu PROTACs der Aurora-A Kinase durchgeführt.
Interaktionen zwischen Aurora-A, der E3-Ligase Cereblon und den Liganden wurden modelliert und für
die Erklärung unterschiedlicher Aktivitäten der eingesetzten PROTACs verwendet. Zudem zeigte das
aktivste PROTAC eine hohe Selektivität für Aurora-A gegenüber Aurora-B, obwohl die verwendete
Erkennungseinheit (Alisertib) an beide Aurora-Proteine bindet. Dieser Umstand konnte durch
energetische Analysen von molekulardynamischen Simulationen der ternären Komplexe erklärt werden.
Optimierungsmöglichkeiten für eine effizientere Degradation von Aurora-A durch die PROTACs wurden
basierend auf modifizierten Erkennungseinheiten und verbesserten Linkern untersucht.
The nervous system relies on an orchestrated assembly of complex cellular entities called neurons, which are specifically committed to information management and transmission. Inter-neuronal communication takes place via synapses, membrane-membrane junctions which ensure efficient signal transfer. Synaptic neurotransmission involves release of presynaptic neurotransmitters and their reception by cognate receptors at postsynaptic terminals. Inhibitory neurotransmission is primarily mediated by the release of neurotransmitters GABA (γ-Aminobutyric acid) and glycine, which are precisely sensed by GABA type-A receptors (GABAARs) and glycine receptors (GlyRs), respectively. GABAAR assembly and maintenance is coordinated by various postsynaptic neuronal factors including the scaffolding protein gephyrin, the neuronal adaptor collybistin (CB) and cell adhesion proteins of the neuroligin (NL) family, specifically NL2 and NL4.
At inhibitory postsynaptic specializations, gephyrin has been hypothesized to form extended structures underneath the plasma membrane, where its interaction with the receptors leads to their stabilization and impedes their lateral movement. Gephyrin mutations have been associated with various brain disorders, including autism, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, and epilepsy. Furthermore, gephyrin loss is lethal and causes mice to die within the first post-natal day. Gephyrin recruitment from intracellular deposits to postsynaptic membranes primarily relies on the adaptor protein CB.
As a moonlighting protein, CB, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), also catalyzes a nucleotide exchange reaction, thereby regenerating the GTP-bound state of the small GTPase Cdc42 from its GDP-bound form. The CB gene undergoes alternative splicing with the majority of CB splice variants featuring an N-terminal SH3 domain followed by tandem Dbl-homology (DH) and pleckstrin-homology (PH) domains. Previous studies demonstrated that the most widely expressed, SH3-domain containing splice variant (CB2SH3+) preferentially adopts a closed conformation, in which the N-terminally located SH3 domain forms intra-molecular interaction with the DH-PH domain tandem. Previous cell-based studies indicated that SH3 domain-encoding CB variants remain untargeted and colocalize with intracellular gephyrin deposits and hence require additional factors which interact with the SH3 domain, thus inducing an open or active conformation. The SH3 domain-deficient CB isoform (CB2SH3-), on the contrary, adopts an open conformation, which possess enhanced postsynaptic gephyrin-clustering and also effectively replenishes the GTP-bound small GTPase-Cdc42 from its GDP-bound state.
Despite the fundamental role of CB as a neuronal adaptor protein maintaining the proper function of inhibitory GABAergic synapses, its interactions with the neuronal scaffolding protein gephyrin and other post synaptic neuronal factors remain poorly understood. Moreover, CB interaction studies with the small GTPase Cdc42 and TC10, a closely related member of Cdc42 subfamily, remains poorly characterized. Most importantly, the roles of the neuronal factors and small GTPases in CB conformational activation have not been elucidated.
This PhD dissertation primarily focuses on delineating the molecular basis of the interactions between CB and postsynaptic neuronal factors. During the course of my PhD dissertation, I engineered a series of CB FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) sensors to characterize the CB interaction with its binding partners along with outlining their role in CB conformational activation. Through the aid of these CB FRET sensors, I analyzed the gephyrin-CB interaction, which, due to technical limitations remained unaddressed for more than two decades (refer Chapter 2 for more details). Subsequently, I also unraveled the molecular basis of the interactions between CB and the neuronal cell adhesion factor neuroligin 2 (refer chapter 2) and the small GTPases Cdc42 and TC10 (refer chapter 3) and describe how these binding partners induce a conformational activation of CB.
In summary, this PhD dissertation provides strong evidence of a closely knit CB communication network with gephyrin, neuroligin and the small GTPase TC10, wherein CB activation from closed/inactive to open/active states is effectively triggered by these ligands.
p97 uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to unfold and thereby segregate proteins. It is involved in various cellular processes such as proteasomal degradation, DNA damage repair, autophagy, and endo-lysosomal trafficking. The specificity for these processes is controlled by more than 30 regulatory cofactors.
Interactions of p97 with cofactors and target proteins are known to be highly dynamic and transient. To identify new interaction partners and to uncover novel cellular functions of p97, the interactome of endogenous p97 was determined by using in cellulo crosslinking followed by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. Myoferlin (MYOF) was identified as a novel interactor of p97 and the interaction was validated in reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments for different cell lines.
The ferlin family member MYOF is a tail-anchored membrane protein containing multiple C2 domains. MYOF is involved in various membrane repair and trafficking processes such as the endocytic recycling of cell surface receptors. The MYOF interactome was determined by mass spectrometry. Among others, the p97 cofactor PLAA, CD71 and Rab14 were identified as common interactors of p97 and MYOF. Immunoprecipitation experiments with PLAA KO cells revealed that the interaction between MYOF and p97 depends on PLAA. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed a co-localization of MYOF with Rab14 and Rab11, which are both involved in endocytic recycling pathways. Furthermore, immunofluoroscence experiments revealed that MYOF and the p97 cofactor PLAA are localized to Rab14- and Rab5-positive endosomal compartments.
Using p97 inhibitors and p97 trapping mutants, the presence of p97 at MYOF-positive and Rab14-positive structures could be demonstrated. Consistent with this finding, the endocytic recycling of transferrin was delayed upon inhibition of p97. Taken together, this work identified MYOF as a novel interactor of p97 and suggests a role for p97 in the recycling of endocytic cargo.