• search hit 23 of 33
Back to Result List

Evaluating blood oxygen saturation measurements by popular fitness trackers in postoperative patients: a prospective clinical trial

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-349913
  • Summary Blood oxygen saturation is an important clinical parameter, especially in postoperative hospitalized patients, monitored in clinical practice by arterial blood gas (ABG) and/or pulse oximetry that both are not suitable for a long-term continuous monitoring of patients during the entire hospital stay, or beyond. Technological advances developed recently for consumer-grade fitness trackers could—at least in theory—help to fill in this gap, but benchmarks on the applicability and accuracy of these technologies in hospitalized patients areSummary Blood oxygen saturation is an important clinical parameter, especially in postoperative hospitalized patients, monitored in clinical practice by arterial blood gas (ABG) and/or pulse oximetry that both are not suitable for a long-term continuous monitoring of patients during the entire hospital stay, or beyond. Technological advances developed recently for consumer-grade fitness trackers could—at least in theory—help to fill in this gap, but benchmarks on the applicability and accuracy of these technologies in hospitalized patients are currently lacking. We therefore conducted at the postanaesthesia care unit under controlled settings a prospective clinical trial with 201 patients, comparing in total >1,000 oxygen blood saturation measurements by fitness trackers of three brands with the ABG gold standard and with pulse oximetry. Our results suggest that, despite of an overall still tolerable measuring accuracy, comparatively high dropout rates severely limit the possibilities of employing fitness trackers, particularly during the immediate postoperative period of hospitalized patients. Highlights •The accuracy of O2 measurements by fitness trackers is tolerable (RMSE ≲4%) •Correlation with arterial blood gas measurements is fair to moderate (PCC = [0.46; 0.64]) •Dropout rates of fitness trackers during O2 monitoring are high (∼1/3 values missing) •Fitness trackers cannot be recommended for O2 measuring during critical monitoringshow moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Philipp Helmer, Philipp Rodemers, Sebastian Hottenrott, Robert Leppich, Maja Helwich, Rüdiger Pryss, Peter Kranke, Patrick Meybohm, Bernd E. Winkler, Michael Sammeth
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-349913
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik / Institut für Informatik
Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie (ab 2004)
Medizinische Fakultät / Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie
Language:English
Parent Title (English):iScience
ISSN:2589-0042
Year of Completion:2023
Volume:26
Issue:11
Article Number:108155
Source:iScience (2023) 26:11, 108155. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108155
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108155
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:bioelectronics; clinical measurement in health technology; fitness trackers; health sciences; multidisciplinary
Release Date:2024/04/23
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International